RSIS presents the following commentary Syrian Uprising: Arab League acts on Damascus by James M. Dorsey. It is also available online at this link. (To print it, click on this link.). Kindly forward anycomments or feedback to the Editor RSIS Commentaries, atRSISPublication@ntu.edu.sg
No. 167/2011 dated 15 November 2011
Syrian Uprising: Arab League acts on Damascus
By James M. Dorsey
The Arab League has moved towards action to halt the brutal crackdown on anti-government protesters in Syria. It has taken decisions to lay the ground for United Nations action against the Assad regime and strengthen calls for international intervention to stop the bloodshed.
ARAB LEAGUE foreign ministers have given Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad a
three-day window to halt the brutal crackdown on anti-government protesters,
failing which they will take the matter to the United Nations. The League’s moves
aim to prevent Syria sliding into civil war following increased fighting between the
Syrian armed forces and significant numbers of military defectors, as well as
mounting sectarian violence. The government crackdown has incurred 3,500 dead
and thousands more wounded among the protesters, particularly in the city of Homs,
a focal point of the eight-month old revolt against the Assad regime.
The League’s suspension of Syrian membership and decision to consult with the
UN signal to the embattled Syrian leader that time is running out for his regime.
It also puts on notice opponents of UN sanctions against Syria, particularly
UN Security Council members Russia, China, India, Brazil and South Africa, that
their refusal to back Western efforts to tighten the screws on the Syrian regime
can no longer count on regional support for Assad to resolve the crisis with brute
force. That is an attempt that has so far failed in the face of the protesters’
remarkable resilience and which the Arab League’s moves will make more
difficult, if not impossible, for world and regional powers to tolerate.
Civil war looms large
Regionally, increased Arab League pressure and willingness to take the issue to
the UN on humanitarian grounds can weaken Iran’s unconditional support for
Assad, Iran’s foremost Arab ally. It strengthens those in Iran who believe that
such support has increased the Islamic republic’s isolation from the region
and prevented it from being part of a regional or international solution,
notwithstanding recent Iranian calls for a halt to the bloodshed.
The spectre of a civil war in Syria with potential fallout in neighbouring
countries increases pressure on opponents of international efforts to achieve
a halt to the Syrian crackdown. It also will strengthen calls for and add pressure
on the United States and Europe to consider military intervention despite
their reluctance and distraction with their economic woes. To be sure, the Arab
League explicitly ruled out international military intervention in Syria.
Meanwhile, Syrian assertions that the regime is confronting an armed rebellion
rather than peaceful anti-government protests are becoming a self-fulfilling
prophecy. They are said to have the covert support of Saudi funding for arms
purchases in Lebanon and Turkey and tacit Turkish support for the Free Syrian
Army made up of Syrian military defectors that is encamped on the Turkish side
of the Syrian border.
The sense of Syria teetering on the brink of civil war is heightened by mounting
signs of sectarian violence particularly in Homs, a predominantly Sunni Muslim
city with a significant minority of Christians and Alawites, who have supported
Assad. The battle lines in Homs between protesters and Assad’s forces are
believed to have been blurred by the targeting of people accused of assisting the
regime as well as its military and militias. Some 100 people have reportedly been
killed in Homs in recent tit-for-tat inter-communal killings.
By increasing pressure on Assad, the Arab League is also pushing Syrian
opposition forces to get their act together. The invitation to Syrian opposition
groups to meet with the League in Cairo constitutes an effort to force them to
form a unified front. The absence of such a front has in some ways helped
Assad because of the lack of a clear opposition leadership and uncertainty
about who might come to power if Assad were driven from office.
Sanctions start to bite
Finally, the League’s threat to impose sanctions if Assad fails to halt the
crackdown within the three-day timeline significantly tightens the screws
just when Western economic sanctions are being felt in Syria with the
threat of a freeze on Arab investments and on assets of Assad associates
in the Gulf. It would further make it difficult for countries like Russia, China
and India to ignore Western and reject UN sanctions and continue to conduct
business as usual with Syria.
Oil majors Shell and Total have reduced oil production in Syria because
of the sanctions and in an indication of fiscal constraints Syria has stopped
paying the two companies. Arab League sanctions increase the likelihood
that the European Union will expand its sanction regime by making
it illegal for international firms to maintain oil and gas investments in Syria.
This would not only affect Shell and Total but also Canada’s Suncor Energy,
Britain’s Petrofac, India’s Oil and Natural Gas Corp and the China National
Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Nonetheless, despite the Arab League’s decision to finally put Assad on the
mat and substantially increase pressure on him, there seems no immediate
solution that will halt the bloodshed and help bring Syria back from the brink.
Assad has painted himself into a corner with the brutality of his crackdown
and failure to live up to his own promises, and many in the opposition are
unwilling to consider an exit that would keep him in office. He has given no
indication of being willing to leave and has warned that the fallout of
intervention to remove him would shake the region to its core.
That could also be true if full-fledged civil war erupts, which seems
inevitable if the crackdown continues and probably even if it is halted
but Assad remains in office. The only solution is Assad’s departure; the
question is at what cost that will be achieved in terms of Syrian lives
and regional stability.
James M. Dorsey is a Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of
International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.
He has been a journalist covering the Middle East for over 30 years.
Click here for past commentaries.
Click here to subscribe/unsubscribe to the mailing list.
Find us on Facebook.
By James M. Dorsey A nationalist Turkish television station with close ties to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has dug up a 12-year-old map that projects Turkey’s sphere of influence in 2050 as stretching from South-eastern Europe on the northern coast of the Mediterranean and Libya on its southern shore across North Africa, the Gulf and the Levant into the Caucasus and Central Asia. Buoyed by last year’s Azerbaijani defeat of Armenia, TGRT, a subsidiary of Ihlas Holding, a media and construction conglomerate that has won major government tenders, used the map to advance a policy that has long constituted the agenda of some of Mr. Erdogan’s closest advisors. The broadcasting of the map, first published in a book authored by George Freidman , the founder of Stratfor, an influential American corporate intelligence group, followed calls by pan-Turkic daily Turkiye , Ihlas’ daily newspaper that has the fourth-largest circulation in Turkey, to leverage the Azerbaijani victory to cre
By James M. Dorsey Turkey is leveraging its successful backing of Azerbaijan’s recent war against Armenia to counter Iran in the Caucasus and gradually challenge Russia in Central Asia, the heart of what Moscow considers its backyard. The Turkish moves have elicited different responses from Russia and Iran, two countries Turkey views as both partners and rivals. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been careful not to jeopardize his newly found status as a Russian recognized-player in the southern Caucasus. By contrast, Mr. Erdogan seems determined to provoke Iran with statements and postings by-his state-run broadcaster that potentially call into question the territorial integrity of the Islamic republic. In doing so, Mr. Erdogan is fueling Iran’s deepest fears . Iran, not without reason, has long believed that the United States and Saudi Arabia are bent on instigating ethnic unrest in a bid to force Tehran to alter policies, if not topple the Iranian regime. “Tur
By James M. Dorsey A prominent Muslim scholar has warned that the West’s failure to include the incarceration in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the Muslim world of pro-democracy religious scholars risks perpetuating autocratic rule. “The world manufactures the condition that it condemns. We don’t rise up to condemn the persecution of Muslim democrats when it occurs, and we don’t go out of our way to protect Muslim democrats. In fact, there is a deeply embedded hypocrisy when it comes to the Muslim world,” said Khaled Abou el Fadel, a Kuwait-born University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Islamic law professor and human rights activist. Mr. Abou el Fadel was speaking at a virtual conference , organized by the Washington-based Arab Center for Law and Research to focus attention on Sheikh Salman al Oudeh, a popular but controversial religious scholar, who is one of several religious figures incarcerated since 2017 on terrorism-related charges. Saudi prosecutors have demanded the d