Gulf crisis ties global soccer governance into knots
By James M. Dorsey
International soccer governance is tying itself up in knots
with football associations grappling with the fallout of the Gulf dispute
between Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt and Qatar that lays bare the
contradictions embedded in their insistence that sports and politics do not
mingle.
The contradictions were evident in different responses to
the Gulf crisis by world soccer body FIFA and its African affiliate, the Cairo-based
Confederation of African Football (CAF). In fact, FIFA was seemingly so tied up
in knots that it contradicted itself in a 24-hour span.
Asked whether the Saudi-UAE-led diplomatic and economic
embargo of 2022 World Cup Qatar would impact the tournament, FIFA
president Gianni Infantino insisted that “the essential role of FIFA, as I
understand it, is to deal with football and not to interfere in geopolitics."
Yet, FIFA, on the same day that Mr. Infantino made his
statement, waded into the escalating Gulf crisis by removing a Qatari
referee from a 2018 World Cup qualifier following a request from the United
Arab Emirates.
FIFA, beyond declaring that the decision was taken “in view
of the current geopolitical situation,” appeared to be saying by implication
that a Qatari by definition of his nationality could not be an honest arbiter
of a soccer match involving one of his country’s detractors.
By taking that stand, FIFA in effect was saying that sports
and politics were not separate but inextricably intertwined. On an even slipperier
slope, the organization also appeared to be judging the referee’s
professionalism based on his nationality.
For its part, CAF, in a statement
this week warned Egypt’s two top clubs, arch rivals Al Ahli FC and Al Zamalek
SC, that they could be penalized if they went through with a declared boycott
of BeIN Sports, the Middle East’s prime satellite sports channel that is part
of the Qatar-owned Al Jazeera television network.
The two clubs declared their boycott with the support of the
Egyptian Football Association (EFA), a CAF member and the host of CAF’s Cairo headquarters.
"The Egyptian FA fully supports the long-awaited
decisions of the political administration against an entity that has repeatedly
tried to harm our country. In agreement we call on all Egyptian clubs and their
personnel to suspend all activities with the Qatari sports channels on all
contracts or in programming in rejection of the Qatari attitude,” the EFA said
in a statement.
Al Ahli and Zamalek said they were barring BeIN from their
premises and news conferences as part of Egypt’s participation in the Saudi-UAE
led diplomatic and economic embargo on the Gulf state.
BeIN owns the Middle East broadcasting rights for the CAF
Champions League in which the two Egyptian clubs regularly feature. It also
holds the region’s rights for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups, the Asian Cup, the Africa
Cup of Nations, the Champions League, and the AFC Champions League.
CAF warned that neutrality and a separation of sports and
politics was “part of the statutory missions of CAF and FIFA, as well as the
obligations of member associations.” It said that it would be “particularly
vigilant as regards respect for these principles of neutrality and independence
in all future games played under its aegis.” The federation warned that its
committees would monitor developments and where necessary take punitive action.
The CAF effort to uphold the fiction of a separation of
sports and politics maintained almost universally among international and
national sports administrators stands a chance of succeeding as long as Egypt
does not follow the UAE and Bahrain in criminalizing expressions of support for
Qatar.
The Egyptian government, unlike the Gulf states, has also refrained from
acting against BeIN.
Wearing a jersey of globally popular Spanish soccer giant FC
Barcelona can lead to a 15-year prison sentence in the UAE and/or a fine of up
to $136,000 because it carries the logo of Qatar Airways, the club’s foremost
sponsor.
Not known for its press freedom, Egypt ranks among the world’s
top jailers of journalists and has banned dozens of websites in the walk-up to
the embargo, including Qatari-sponsored media like Al Jazeera, whose
journalists it has long targeted, alleging that the network supported the
banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Economically dependent on Saudi Arabia and the UAE, Egypt is,
however, likely to support a Saudi competitor of BeIN once it is up and
running. In another demonstration of the incestuous relationship between sports
and politics, Saudi Arabia announced earlier this month that it was launching a
sports network to replace BeIN. The initiative is part of Saud Arabia’s effort
to force Qatar to adopt policies aligned with those of the kingdom, which
include shutting more free-wheeling media, including Al Jazeera, that are
funded by the Gulf state.
Saudi
Media City chairman Muflih Al-Hafatah said the new network was being
establish together with Egypt and that its 11 high definition channels were “Egyptian
with a 100 percent Saudi capital.”
Mr. Al-Hafatah said the channels would
charge a fee only if forced to do so because of encryption, but would ensure
that it was affordable. BeIN has suffered in countries like Egypt from the fact
that many could not afford its cost.
FIFA will likely be an arbitrator in the battle between BeIN
and the new Saudi network. Saudi sports lawyer Majid Garoub said
the kingdom was attempting to convince the world soccer body that Qatar could
not be allowed to have a monopoly in regional soccer broadcasting rights.
"Due to the political situation in the region Saudi
Arabia will have to negotiate with FIFA on the rights issues. We will be
submitting a report on the developments and FIFA will have to look into it,"
Mr. Garoub said.
With other words, FIFA and various of its regional
associations will be dragged into the Gulf crisis by hook or by crook even if
the issue of Qatar’s World Cup hosting rights is not directly addressed. The
more soccer associations get sucked into the dispute, the tougher it will be
for them to maintain that sports and politics have nothing to do with one
another.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S.
Rajaratnam School of International Studies, co-director of the University of
Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, and the author of The Turbulent World
of Middle East Soccer blog, a book with
the same title, Comparative Political Transitions
between Southeast Asia and the Middle East and North Africa, co-authored with Dr.
Teresita Cruz-Del Rosario and three forthcoming books, Shifting
Sands, Essays on Sports and Politics in the Middle East and North Africa as
well as Creating Frankenstein: The Saudi Export of Ultra-conservatism and China
and the Middle East: Venturing into the Maelstrom.
Comments
Post a Comment