JMD in Firstpost: Geopolitics, the black swan in Saudi-Indian relations
India James M Dorsey Feb 14, 2019
23:57:30 IST FIRSTPOST PRINT
EDITION
When Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman meets Indian
Prime Minister Narendra Modi next week, the elephant in the room is likely to
be what weighs more: the issues the two men agree on or the ones that divide
them.
As a matter of principle, Prince Mohammed and Mr. Modi are likely to
take their strategic partnership to a new level as a result of changing energy
markets, a decline in American power, the rise of China and the transnational
threat of political violence.
Discussions with the crown prince and his delegation of Saudi
businessmen on energy and investment will prove to be the easy part. Saudi
Arabia is investing US$44 million in a refinery in Maharashtra’s Ratnagiri and
supplies 20 percent of India’s crude oil. India, moreover, expects the Saudis
to invest in ports and roads while Saudi Arabia is interested in Indian
agriculture that would export products to the kingdom.
At first glance, security issues should be a no-brainer. The two
countries hold joint military exercises, share intelligence and cooperate on
counterterrorism. They are also working to counter money laundering and funding
of political violence. Things get complicated, however, when geopolitics kicks
in. Prince Mohammed arrives in Delhi on the back of a visit to Pakistan, where
he is expected to sign a memorandum of understanding on a framework for $10
billion of investments, primarily in oil refining, petrochemicals, renewable
energy and mining.
The memo follows significant Saudi aid to help Pakistan evade a
financial crisis that included a $3-billion deposit in Pakistan’s central bank
to support the country’s balance of payments and another $3 billion in deferred
payments for oil imports.
The tricky part are the investments in the memorandum that include a
plan by the Saudi national oil company Aramco to build a refinery at the
Chinese-backed port of Gwadar, close to Pakistan’s border with Iran and the
Indian-backed Iranian port of Chabahar. Both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are
closely monitoring Chabahar’s progress.
A potential Saudi investment in the troubled Pakistani province of
Balochistan’s Reko Diq copper and gold mine would strengthen the kingdom’s hold
in the strategic province that both Prince Mohammed and US president Donald J
Trump’s hardline national security adviser John Bolton see as a potential
launching pad for efforts to destabilise Iran. Taken together, the refinery, an
oil reserve in Gwadar and the mine would also help Saudi Arabia in efforts to
prevent Chabahar from emerging as a powerful Arabian Sea hub.
Saudi funds are flowing into ultra-conservative anti-Shiite,
anti-Iranian Sunni madrassas in Balochistan. It remains unclear whether the
money originates with the Saudi government, Saudi nationals of Baloch descent
or the two million-strong Pakistani diaspora in the kingdom.
The money helps put in place building blocks for possible covert action
should the kingdom or the US — or both — decide to act on proposals to support
irredentist action.
Such covert action could jeopardise Indian hopes to use Chabahar to
bypass Pakistan, enhance its trade with Afghanistan and Central Asia and create
an antidote to Gwadar, a crown jewel in China’s Belt and Road initiative.
Pakistani analysts expect around $5 billion in Afghan trade to flow
through Chabahar after India in December started handling the port operations.
It could also further strain ties with Pakistan that accuses India of fomenting
nationalist unrest in Balochistan.
The funds take on added significance in the face of Saudi concerns about
Chabahar and India’s support for the port. The money continues to flow even
though the crown prince has significantly cut back on the kingdom’s global
funding of ultra-conservative Sunni Muslim groups to bolster his assertion that
the kingdom is embracing a more moderate, albeit as yet undefined, form of
Islam.
The money started coming in at about the time the Riyadh-based International Institute for Iranian Studies published a study that said Chabahar posed a “direct threat to the Arab Gulf states” that called for “immediate countermeasures”.
Written by Mohammed Hassan Husseinbor, a Washington-based Iranian Baloch
lawyer and activist, the study warned that Chabahar would allow Iran to step up
oil exports to India at the expense of Saudi Arabia, raise foreign investment
in the Islamic Republic, increase government revenues and allow Tehran some
muscle-flexing in the Gulf and the Indian Ocean. Noting the expanse of Iran’s
Sistan and Balouchestan province, Mr. Husseinbor said “it would be a formidable
challenge, if not impossible, for the Iranian government to protect such long
distances and secure Chabahar in the face of widespread Baluch opposition,
particularly if this opposition is supported by Iran’s regional adversaries and
world powers”.
Published in a country that tightly controls the media as well as the
output of think tanks, the study stroked with a memorandum drafted a year later
by Mr. Bolton before he assumed office. The memo envisioned US support “for the
democratic Iranian opposition”, including in Balochistan and Iran’s Sistan and
Baluchestan province.
Iranian officials believe that Saudi Arabia and the US have a hand in a
string of recent attacks by Baloch, Kurdish and Iranian Arab nationalists but
have so far refrained from producing anything beyond allegations. Most
recently, they point to a rare suicide bombing in Chabahar in December that
targeted a Revolutionary Guards headquarters, killing two people and wounding
40.
Writing in the Pakistan Security Report 2018, journalist Muhammad Akbar
Notezai said, “to many in Pakistan” concerns about Indian support for the
Baloch “were materialized with the arrest of Kulbushan Jadhav, an Indian spy in
Balochistan who had come through Iran. Ever since, Pakistani intelligence agencies
have been on extra-alert on its border with Iran”.
The journalist warned that “the more Pakistan slips into the Saudi
orbit, the more its relations with Iran will worsen… If their borders remain
troubled, anyone can fish in the troubled water”.
Mr. Notezai implicitly put his finger on the pitfalls Prince Mohammed
and Mr. Modi will have to negotiate to ensure that their ever closer economic,
energy and security relations can withstand the challenges posed by the
escalating and intertwined rivalries that link West and South Asia.
James M Dorsey is a senior fellow at Singapore’s S
Rajaratnam School of International Studies and co-director of the University of
Wuerzburg’s Institute of Fan Culture.
This article appeared in Firstpost
Updated Date: Feb 14, 2019 23:57:30 IST
Comments
Post a Comment