UEFA decision on Gibraltar opens AFC prospects for Kurds
By James M. Dorsey
A decision by European soccer body UEFA to grant Gibraltar
the right of membership potentially opens the door to Kurdistan to seek
association with the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) in a move that would
acknowledge demands for increased autonomy and the possible shifting of
national borders in the Middle East as a result of a wave of change sweeping
the region and the civil war in Syria.
The UEFA decision on Gibraltar following a ruling by the
Lausanne-based Court of Arbitration of Sport (CAS) and the possible Iraqi
Kurdish application to the AFC puts pressure on world soccer body FIFA to
loosen its rules on membership as the group gears up for its general assembly
in Mauritius next week.
CAS ruled that UEFA’s adoption in 1999 of FIFA’s rule that
members need to be recognized by the United Nations was unfair. UEFA originally
accepted the UN rule in 1999 to appease Spain which was opposed to the British
outpost’s membership.
FIFA has used the rule to bar groups like the Kurds but
relaxed its criteria for Palestine, which was granted membership despite not
having full UN membership. The AFC’s statutes refer to the UN rule only
indirectly by stating that membership has to comply with FIFA’s statutes.
An application by Iraqi Kurdistan is likely to be resisted
by Middle Eastern members of the AFC that are largely controlled directly or
indirectly by governments that have been put on the defensive as a result of the
popular revolts in the region and an international community that is reticent
to see a redrawing of colonial-era borders.
Iraqi Kurdistan has been autonomous within Iraq since
Western powers imposed a no-fly-zone in the early 1990s to protect the Kurds from
retaliation by then Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. Iraqi Kurds see their national
soccer team as a vehicle to assert nationhood and achieve eventual statehood.
The Kurds are but one group, albeit the most important one
in the Middle East, that is demanding greater self-rule and recognition of
national rights. The civil war in Syria has raised questions about what a
post-Bashar Al-Assad state would look like with Syrian Kurds demanding autonomy
and fears that Mr. Al-Assad’s last resort may be to carve out a state for his
minority Alawite sect. Kurdish guerrillas in Turkey are negotiating with the
government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan greater rights within Turkey.
Sunni Muslim tribal leaders in Iraq are demanding a
federation that would give them greater control of their own affairs against
the backdrop of increased sectarian violence. Other multi-ethnic states in the
Middle East like Iran risk minorities demanding greater rights. Israel and the
Palestinians have yet to agree on their borders as part of an elusive peace
agreement.
“Ominous political realities may be rendering the
nation-state system incompatible with the emerging new Arab world….the
disintegration that the region has already witnessed – and will undoubtedly
continue to witness – will reverberate beyond the Arab map with the creation of
a sovereign Kurdish state. Such a state, whether existing de facto or with
widespread formal recognition, will have an ever-lasting effect on the
boundaries of the Arab world (Syria and Iraq) and of the wider Middle East
(Turkey and Iran),” said Saudi analyst Nawaf Obaid, a visiting fellow at the
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University’s
Kennedy School of Government, in a recent analysis.
A statement by Iraqi Kurdish president Massoud Barzani
equating sports to politics as a way of achieving recognition adorns Iraqi
Kurdistan’s three major stadiums and virtually all of its sports centers and
institutions. “We want to serve our nation and use sports to get everything for
our nation. We all believe in what the president said,” says Kurdistan Football
Federation (KFF) president Safin Kanabi, scion of a legendary supporter of
Kurdish soccer who led anti-regime protests in Kurdish stadiums during Saddam
Hussein’s rule.
While Arab states’ natural inclination would be to reject an
Iraqi Kurdish application to the AFC, some believe that opponents of Mr.
Al-Assad, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar may use it as leverage to persuade
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to reduce support for Mr. Al-Assad. Iraq
has a one year, 800,000 ton oil contract with Syria and is believed to allow
Iranian cargo planes headed for Syria to regularly transit its air space.
The KFF has been demanding since last year that FIFA grant
its team the right to plqy international friendlies in much the same way that
the soccer body allowed Kosovo and Catalonia to do so.
“Like any nation, we want to open the door through football.
Take Brazil. People know Brazil first and foremost through football. We want to
do the same. We want to have a strong team by the time we have a country. We do
our job, politicians do theirs. Inshallah (if God wills), we will have a
country and a flag” adds Kurdistan national coach Abdullah Mahmoud Muhieddin.
James M.
Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University, co-director of the Institute
of Fan Culture at the University of Würzburg, and the author of The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog.
"CAS ruled that UEFA’s adoption in 1999 of FIFA’s rule that members need to be recognized by the United Nations was unfair."
ReplyDeleteIs this correct? I thought CAS ruled for Gibraltar because at the time of their original application, this rule wasn't in effect. But I could well be wrong.
My understanding is that at the behest of Spain they applied the UN rule. But thanks for raising the question.
ReplyDelete