Turkey’s anti-Gulen campaign: Strengthening militants and jihadists
Pakistan founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Turkish leader Mustafa Kemal Ataturk adorn the wall of a Gulen school in Pakistan (Source: Aamir Baig/Dawn.com)
By James M. Dorsey
A Turkish demand that Pakistan close 28 primary and
secondary schools associated with controversial, self-exiled Turkish preacher Fethullah
Gulen has put the government in Islamabad in a quandary as it attempts to get a
grip on an education sector in which militant Islamists and jihadists figure
prominently.
Turkish Ambassador to Pakistan S. Babur Girgin’s demand for
the closure of the schools operated by PakTurk International Schools and
Colleges was part of a global effort to dismantle the network of Mr. Gulen, the
Pennsylvania-based head of Hizmet, one of the world’s largest and wealthiest Islamic
movements with businesses, schools and universities in scores of countries.
PakTurk schools have an estimated 10,000 students and are
viewed as some of Pakistan’s better educational institutions. PakTurk has
denied being part of any political or religious movement but admits to
sympathizing with Mr. Gulen’s philosophy.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has blamed Mr. Gulen
for this month’s failed military coup attempt and has demanded that the United
States extradite the preacher to Turkey. The president has in the last week closed
some 1,000 schools and 15 universities in Turkey that he says were associated
with Hizmet, and has arrested or dismissed from public service some 60,000
people alleged to be followers of Mr. Gulen. Responding to Turkish demands,
Azerbaijan earlier this week closed a university that allegedly was founded by
Gulen supporters.
Compliance with the Turkish demand would complicate already
feeble Pakistani government efforts to not only assemble an accurate inventory
of institutions in the country’s education sector but also impose regulation.
Senior government officials concede that they have no accurate overview of how
many schools exist in Pakistan, particularly when it comes to Islamic
seminaries or madrassas.
Estimates by government officials and non-governmental
experts run the gamut, ranging from 25,000 to 88,000 madrassas or one to 50
percent of all educational institutions and one to 33 percent of all students
in a country in which up to 50 percent of school-age children are not enrolled
in an educational institution.
The one thing officials and experts do agree on is the fact
that the majority of madrassas receive foreign funding, including substantial
amounts from Saudi Arabia that often go to larger institutions. Funding from
Saudi Arabia that adheres to Wahhabism, a puritan interpretation of Islam, is
part of a decades-old public diplomacy campaign, the largest in history, that
is designed to propagate ultra-conservative versions of the faith.
“If there is one segment of the population which has
complete freedom of expression in Pakistan, it is the Muslim religious
theocracy – they can say whatever they like - there is no curtailment, there is
no retribution and there is no blowback to them from the state. The rest of us
pay the price,” warned author and policy advisor Najma Minhas.
Minhas’ view echoed by many in Western governments as well
as a host of academics, pundits and journalists is countered by scholars
critical of assertions that madrassas constitute breeding grounds for
militancy. Critics emphasize the welfare and educational impact of a majority
of madrassas in terms of the benefits of a boarding school accrued by poor
families who see their food and housing costs diminished and would otherwise be
unable to give their children any education.
The impact on Pakistani society of the pervasiveness of
Saudi-backed ultra-conservatism is nonetheless evident across the country.
A recent study conducted by the Pakhtunkhwa Cultural
Foundation, a Peshawar-based group that aims to confront the erosion of
culture, concluded that “the Wahabi school of thought gained influence in the
society due to political developments and state patronage, and particularly in
the wake of the war in Afghanistan. Ideologues of the Wahabi school consider
artistic expression against Islam…declaring songs, films and anything artistic
to be obscene… The sharp decline in socio-cultural life has created a vacuum
that is being filled by religious missionaries,” the study said.
It documented in Peshawar the end of public concerts, the
demise of scores of families of artists, the closure of almost 200 CD shops and
dozens of cinemas and the professional death of actors and performers.
Notions of inertia if not complicity in government branches
in which Saudi-backed worldviews have made significant inroads are fuelled by the
fact that security forces seldom capture the killers of artists and cultural
workers or bombers of shops and cinemas. On the contrary, those branches of
government frequently adopt policies that contribute to an environment of
increased intolerance. Victims and their families are left to their own devices
and often reduced to abject poverty.
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom
(USCIRF) reported earlier this year that Pakistani public school textbooks
circulated to at least 41 million children contained derogatory references to
religious minorities. The perception of minorities as threats was reinforced
with the enhanced Islamization of text books in the decade from 1978 to 1988 in
which General Zia ul-Haq ruled Pakistan.
“In public school classrooms, Hindu children are forced to
read lessons about ‘Hindus’ conspiracies toward Muslims’, and Christian
children are taught that ‘Christians learned tolerance and kind-heartedness
from Muslims.’ This represents a public shaming of religious minority children
that begins at a very young age, focusing on their religious and cultural identity
and their communities’ past history. A review of the curriculum demonstrates
that public school students are being taught that religious minorities,
especially Christians and Hindus, are nefarious, violent, and tyrannical by
nature. There is a tragic irony in these accusations, because Christians and
Hindus in Pakistan face daily persecution, are common victims of crime, and are
frequent targets of deadly communal violence, vigilantism, and collective
punishment,” USCIRF report concluded.
“By imposing the harsh, literal interpretation of religion
exported and promoted by Saudi Arabia, we have turned Pakistan into a drab,
monochromatic landscape where colour, laughter, dancing and music are frowned
upon, if not entirely banned. And yet Islam in South Asia was once
characterised by a life-enhancing Sufi tradition that is now under threat. More
and more, we are following the example set by the Taliban,” added Pakistani
writer Irfan Husain.
”We teach students the aqeedah (creed) of every sect and
tell them as to how and where that aqeedah is wrong so that we can guide them
to the right aqeedah,” said Umer bin Abdul Aziz of the Jaimatul Asar madrassa
in Peshawar.
“People who claim that we brainwash children are American
parts. Students are taught the path of virtue and jihad. They learn that humans
are temporary guests in this world and that they have to contribute to their
religion and next life. They learn Islamic principles among which jihad and the
need to defend the interests of Islam and satisfy Allah,” added a teacher in a
militant, Saudi-funded madrassa in Pakistan whose students largely hail from
Afghanistan.
Based on textual analysis of madrassa texts, scholar Niaz
Muhammad warned that “no one should claim that their statements about the
madrassa curriculum have nothing to do with sectarianism or other forms of
religious militancy.”
The dilemma for the Pakistani government is stark. Turkish
prime minister Binali Yildirim has warned that Turkey would be at war with any
country that cooperates or aids the Gulen movement. Yet closing down schools
that prepare their students for a modern society and economy is something
Pakistan’s deeply troubled education sector can ill afford.
Dr. James M.
Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies,
co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, and the
author of The Turbulent World
of Middle East Soccer
blog and a just published book with the same title.
The most surprising thing is that how the Western media overlooks the fundamentalist character of Gulenist movement. Imagine Iran was a republican democracy in 70's and it repulsed Humayni's revolution and then the only concern of France, a host for Humeyni, becomes the democratic standards in Iran, but not what Humeyni would establish. And imagine that nobody mentions the nightmare the country escaped...
ReplyDeleteThis is the most important concern missed by the Western media. I hope you catch it.
Thank you for your comment. This is obviously a very divisive issue, much of which remains drowned in controversy with full facts yet to emerge. Official investigations and critical journalistic scrutiny will hopefully help get to the bottom of it.
ReplyDelete