Creating Frankenstein: The Impact of Saudi Export of Ultra-Conservatism in South Asia (Part 4)
An ambiguous attitude
One
place where refusal to acknowledge Saudi Arabia as the gold standard of an
Islamic State is counter balanced by the belief of the quietist trend in
Saudi-backed Islamic ultra-conservatism is a two storey, walled building built
around a courtyard in an upscale neighbourhood of Islamabad. The building
houses the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII), Pakistan’s top Islamic advisory
body designed to guide parliament on whether proposed bills comply with the
Sharia’a. The Council’s offices hark back a quarter of century to a time when
computers with small monitors were far and few between; fax machines dominated;
and desks were piled with papers, folders and press clippings and dotted with a
battery of telephones.
Two
of the council‘s members, in a rare public brawl in a government agency over
religion, got into a fist fight in 2015 as the council debated further
discrimination against Ahmadis. The council was considering categorizing
Ahmadis as apostates, a crime punishable by death under strict Islamic law.
“I
am stronger than him… He wants to make the law on Ahmadis controversial, and
push the country towards violence,” Maulana Tahir Ashrafi, a controversial,
pot-bellied, alcohol-consuming scholar and head of the Pakistan Ulema Council
charged after 78-year-old Maulana Mohammad Khan Sherani, the CII chairman and a
member of parliament for the Deobandi-affiliated Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (Fazal)
party who adheres to Saudi-backed quietist Salafi principle of unquestioned
obedience to a ruler, grabbed his collar and ripped out the buttons.[1]
Sporting
a square white beard and clad in a black turban and vest and white salwar
kameez, Sherani cuts a stern figure with his Central Asian features and narrow
eyes. He embodies Saudi Arabia’s dilemma: those that it has nurtured and that
are closest to the kingdom’s ideology increasingly view it as a country that
has betrayed its funding beliefs. “Both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are Islamic
states that do not follow what Islam teaches… Allah did not ordain monarchies,”
Sherani asserted in an interview.[2]
In
remarks that deliberately included Saudi Arabia by implication, Sherani
described Pakistan as “a security state” in which “those that are in power do
what is in their interests… Religious leaders participate in elections to bring
rulers closer to the truth. It’s their prerogative not to follow. Those in
power play games and have many puppets. The ulema’s responsibility is to keep
informing the public and government,” Sherani said.
In a
twist of irony, Sherani spoke sitting in his spacious office under a picture of
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the lawyer and politician who founded Pakistan as a
secular republic. The irony and difficulty quietist ultra-conservatives have in
justifying their support for governments they essentially view as illegitimate
was evident in Sherani’s effort to explain his support of the Pakistani
government and endorsement of the Al Sauds’ rule. “You obey the rules and do
not risk fitna in the community,” he said.
Sherani
tied himself into knots as he sought to justify his position. Comparing the
government to a blind man standing at the edge of a well, Sherani argued that
it was his responsibility to warn the man but not stop him. “It is his
responsibility if he does not listen,” Sherani said. When asked if his refusal
to stop the man would not make him an accomplice if he fell into the well and
hurt or killed himself, Sherani quickly changed tack. In the only time that he
smiled during a three-hour interview, he said a better example was a man on a
street who asked for directions but then opted not to follow them. That is not
my responsibility,” he said.
In a
magazine interview after his brawl with Sherani, Ashrafi, referring to the
CIIl’s Saudi-backed ultra-conservatism asserted that “there is a dictatorship
within the body. The environment is such that no scope for dissent is left.”[3]
Shortly after the brawl, the council suggested in apparent support of the fact
that wife beating in Pakistan is the norm rather than the exception[4]
that a draft bill in parliament legalize the right of husbands to ‘lightly’
beat wives who refuse to obey their orders or have sex with them. The council
had earlier urged parliament to declare nine year-old girls eligible for
marriage and replace the Pakistani rupee with gold and silver. The council
further denounced a women’s protection bill passed by the Punjab provincial
assembly as a violation of the tenants of the Sharia.[5]
Members
of parliament blamed the CII days after its ruling on wife beating for the
brutal killing of 18-year old Zeenat Rafiq. Rafiq, one of an increasing number
of women killed for asserting their independence, was burnt alive by her mother
after she married a man of her own choice. “I have killed my daughter. I have
saved my honour. She will never shame me again,” neighbours heard Rafiq’s
mother, who had complained for months that her two elder daughters had married
men of their choice, shout from the roof her house when she was done.[6]
Rafiq
was but one of an average of 1,000 of mostly female victims of honour killings
in Pakistan. A Jirga or council of local elders in the city of Abbottabad where
Osama Bin Laden was killed by US forces ordered the killing of a teenage girl
that had helped a friend elope. The Jirga dictated the manner of her death. The
girl was tortured, injected with poison and then strapped to the seat of a
vehicle that was parked at a bus stop as a message to others, doused with
gasoline and set on fire.
In
parliament, deputies charged that the council had legitimized violence against
women and questioned whether it should be allowed to continue to exist.
Opposition deputies Aitzaz Ahsan and Farhatullah Babar asserted that “the
anti-women bias of the CII as expressed in its recommendations and
pronouncements” had “contributed to crimes against women with impunity.”[7] So
does the breeding of ultra-conservatism among women in the exponential growth
of all-female madrassahs. Columnist I. A. Rehman picked up on that when he
suggested that a section of society, including women, has been influenced by
ultra-conservative opposition to women’s rights to the extent of justifying
violence against all those who rebel against unjust constraints.”[8]
The
council has also condemned co-education, demanded that state-owned Pakistan
International Airlines hostesses be fully covered, and called for the dismissal
of civil servants who failed to say their daily prayers. It declared in 2014
that a man did not need his wife’s consent to marry a second, third or fourth
wife and that DNA of a rape victim did not constitute conclusive evidence.
To
be fair, parliament has in recent years not acted on any of the council’s
positions. Nonetheless, the council forced Marvi Memon, a law maker for the
ruling Muslim League, in early 2016 to withdraw a proposal to ban child
marriages, declaring the draft bill un-Islamic and blasphemous.[9]
The
history of the council, ironically housed on Islamabad’s leafy Ataturk Avenue,
named after the visionary who created modern Turkey as a secular state, charts
the increasing influence of Saudi conservatism in Pakistan. Founded in 1962,
the council was originally headed by Fazlur Rahman Malik, a liberal scholar,
who in the words of Pakistani journalist Farahnaz Ispahani put forward “bold
and ingenious interpretation of Islamic themes, including suggesting that drinking
of alcohol was permissible, provided it did not result in intoxication.”[10]
Rahman,
who returned to Pakistan from Canada at the invitation of President Ayub Khan
to head the council’s predecessor, the Central Institute of Islamic Research,
resigned in 1968 frustrated with the success of conservative opposition to his
ideas. The council’s conservative instinct was boosted in the late 1970s and
the 1980s by Zia ul Haq who needed it to legitimize his effort to Islamicize
Pakistani society. It was under Ul Haq that Pakistan enacted hudood, Islamic
law’s concept of punishment that involves amputations, whipping and death
sentences for crimes such as theft, pre-marital sex, and rape, and that
ultra-conservatives interpret as a license to put rape victims at risk of
prosecution if he or she cannot produce four upright male eye-witnesses.
In
an unprecedented parliamentary debate in 2015 about the council’s role,
opposition deputy Pakistan People’s Party’s Farhatullah Babar called for its
dissolution because it was “dangerously conservative” and irrelevant. “I am
pained that some of the council’s pronouncements have prompted the critics to
describe it as something of medieval nonsense at public expense,” said Babar.
He cited a long list of “long and frustrating” council proposals that included
inscribing the words Allah-o-Akbar (God is Great) on Pakistan’s national flag
and charged that the council inspired martyrdom and jihad. Islamist deputies
denounced Babar and demanded that he recite verses of the Quran to prove his
religiosity.[11]
The
positions adopted by the council were with the exception of the transgenders in
line with Saudi policy. Saudi influence was also evident in Pakistan’s feeble
attempts to gain some measure of control of the madrassahs that mostly involve
boarding schools. Registration with the Pakistan Madrassa Education Board
(PMEB), the government’s overall board, established in 2003 to oversee boards
that represent the country’s five Muslim schools of thought, and encourage
madrassahs to use government syllabi and offer vocational training is voluntary
rather than mandatory. Oversight of the five sectarian boards by the education
and religious affairs ministries, bulwarks of ultra-conservatism, has proven to
be spotty at best.
As a
result, the PMEB’s efforts have been largely rejected by the more conservative
and militant institutions, many of which have had Saudi financial backing. PMEB
chairman Amir Tauseen, estimated 13 years after the board’s establishment that
up to 10,000 religious seminaries were not registered. A renewed effort in in
2015 to get madrassas to register, involving newspaper advertisements, failed
to convey sincerity by aiming to get a mere 500 institutions to register.[12]
Traditional culture on the defensive
Gunmen on a motorbike shot dead one of Pakistan's best known
Sufi musicians and scion of a musical dynasty, Amjad Sabri, in June 2016 as he
drove his car in the port city of Karachi. Fakhre Alam, the Chairman of the
Sindh Board of Film Censors, claimed on Twitter that security authorities had
earlier rejected a request by Sabri for protection. The Islamabad High Court
(IHC) in 2014 demanded an explanation in a blasphemy case from Sabri and two TV
channels who were accused of playing and broadcasting a qawwali, a form of Sufi
devotional music, that was deemed offensive because it referred to the Prophet
Mohammed.[13]
The killing claimed by the Pakistani Taliban was the latest
in a campaign waged by jihadists as well as non-violent Saudi-backed
ultra-conservative interpreters of Islam that has in recent decades stifled
popular culture; silenced music; led to the bombing of theatres and video and
music shops; and provoked the death of scores of musicians and other artists.
Sabri was a target both as a musician and a Sufi, whose shrines have repeatedly
been attacked in recent years. His assassination served as a warning to those
determined to celebrate and preserve indigenous cultural traditions. Human
rights activist Ali Dayan Hasan warned that each killing brought Pakistan
closer to being what he termed a Wahhabi-Salafist wasteland.
It is a wasteland that Saadat Hasan Manto, a Muslim
journalist, Indian film screenwriter and South Asia’s foremost short story
writer envisioned as early as 1954 in an essay, ‘By the Grace of Allah.’
Manto
described a Pakistan in which everything – music and art, literature and poetry
– was censored. “There were clubs where people gambled and drank. There were
dance houses, cinema houses, art galleries and God knows what other places full
of sin ... But now by the grace of God, gentlemen, one neither sees a poet or a
musician… Thank God we are now rid of these satanic people. The people had been
led astray. They were demanding their undue rights. Under the aegis of an
atheist flag they wanted to topple the government. By the grace of God, not a single one of
those people is amongst us today. Thank goodness a million times that we are
ruled by mullahs and we present sweets to them every Thursday…. By the grace of
God, our world is now cleansed of this chaos. People eat, pray and sleep,”
Manto wrote.[14]
Maulana Amir Siddiqui, the leading imam at Islamabad’s
notorious Red Mosque, one of the Pakistani capital’s oldest mosques named after
its red walls and interior, is just the sort of mullah Manto had in mind. “Music
is a great weapon of Satan used to spread obscenity in society. As music
spreads, people will get only further away from the Qur’an,” Siddiqui argued in
a sermon in 2015. In an interview, he added that “if there is something that
draws a person closer to sin like music does, it is forbidden. All music these
days is based on temptation, emotions, and illicit relations between men and
women, which can lead to sex and sin.”[15]
Seven years prior to Siddique’s sermon, students at the
mosque’s madrassah launched an anti-vice campaign and marched through
Islamabad. They attacked and beat those they accused of running brothels and
torched video and music shops. More than a 100 people were killed in fighting
between the students and security forces. Authorities found stockpiles of
weapons in the Red Mosque’s compound.
Karachi’s Metropol Hotel, once Pakistan’s prime music venue
that hosted the likes of Dizzy Gillespie, Duke Ellington and Quincey Jones,
stands today and shuttered and in decay.
“The biggest names in the industry, people we grew up listening to, have
just completely given up. It’s very disheartening, people walking away, people
you think are so successful, gods, the stars and the icons. It’s like Freddy
Mercury just decided to open up a restaurant instead of being on stage.” said
Sara Haider, a 24-year old rising star who records in her own studio because
Pakistani music labels refuse to sign new artists.[16]
Sabeen Mahmud, a prominent Pakistani social and human rights
activist who operated The Second Floor, one of Karachi’s few remaining retreats
for artists, gave Sara her first break. The 40-year old was gunned down in
April 2015.
Gulzur Alam, one of Pakistan’s most popular folk singers
with a fan base that stretches into Afghanistan and across the Pashtu Diaspora,
hasn’t performed for years.
“Pashtun Youth, raise the red flags of revolution high in
your hands, come!
Pashtun Youth, raise the red flags of revolution,
The land cries for revolution,
The revolution that can ensure freedom for all,” reads one of
his most popular songs composed in 1987.
Sitting on the floor of a dilapidated music hall in Peshawar
in front of empty chairs that have not been occupied for years, Alam recalls
how men would sit on one side and women on the other as he enamoured them with
his music. People would shower flowers as he came on stage. His voice brought
audiences to tears. Yet, under the influence of ultra-conservatives,
authorities harassed him and his family and ultimately shut down the concert
hall, saying they could no longer ensure public security in the face of violent
opposition to expressions of traditional and non-religious culture.
“Now the hall is filled with silence. One feels scared… If
you remove culture from a nation, that nation dies. We have a centuries old
tradition of music. The traditions have been attacked, murdered. It’s left us
all deeply depressed,” Alam says.
Threatening phone calls persuaded him to no longer perform
in the Northwest Frontier Province. He tried to find gigs in the port city of
Karachi, but there, he faced a different problem: ethnic violence against
Pashtuns. The situation was no different in Baluchistan. In total, he moved and
his family moved 18 times to evade the threats.
In Karachi, he landed in the firing lines of ethnic violence
against Pashtuns and returned with his family and without income to Peshawar
where his older brother refused to take him because it would put his family in
danger. Alam, his wife and five children, now cram into three dank, dark rooms
with no running water. "It's like falling from the sky to earth,"
says Rukhsana Muqaddas, Alam's wife. "Before this we had a very modern,
wonderful life. We used to send our kids to good schools. Now, we can't afford
to educate them at all."[17]
Alam recalls performing at a wedding with a group of
musicians in the Swat Valley in 2008. They were ambushed by armed men emerging
from the bushes on a mountain road as they were returning home from their
performance. “All of sudden men jumped out. They opened fire. Many people were
hit, including my friend, Anwar Gul,” a renowned composer and harmonium player.
“He died later in the hospital,” Alam said, his voice trailing. Months later he
was hit by a car and walks with the aid of a stick ever since. “We humans are
social beings, we need friends but so many of them have died and I am now
alone. I take sleeping pills to calm my nerves but I believe my death will soon
come as well,” he adds.[18]
In one of the few music shops still open in Peshawar, Alam
points to CDs by a host of well-known musicians. “Shah Wali, he’s in Canada;
Naghma, she’s in America; and Sardar Ali Takkar, he’s also in America; he’s
also in America,” Alam says, pointing a finger at yet another CD. “I’ve had
chances to leave and have been offered asylum but I never thought it would get
this bad. Now it’s too late, other countries won’t accept us. I gave 35 years
to music and I’m 55 years old, I no longer know what to do. I can’t support my
family,” Alam says, explaining why he didn’t follow his friends and colleagues
into exile.
Alam’s native Peshawar and Swat Valley nestled in the
foothills of the Hindu Kush, illustrates the corroding impact of Saudi-backed
ultra-conservatism as well as government policies that were supported the
kingdom and served its foreign and soft power policies. The region once boasted
a vibrant cultural life punctured by concerts, theatre performances, art
exhibitions, festivals and poetry recitals. All of that has been replaced by
countless madrassahs and ultra-conservative religious and jihadist literature
and education curricula. A cultural hub was transformed into a hotbed of
inward-looking, intolerant worldviews initially populated by the mujahedeen
confronting the Soviets in nearby Afghanistan and their successors, the
Taliban.
A study conducted by the Pakhtunkhwa Cultural Foundation, a
Peshawar-based group that aims to confront the erosion of culture, concluded
that “the Wahabi school of thought gained influence in the society due to
political developments and state patronage, and particularly in the wake of the
war in Afghanistan. Ideologues of the Wahabi school consider artistic
expression against Islam. Groups such as Tablighi preachers sprang up during
the period and rendered great damage declaring songs, films and anything
artistic to be obscene… The sharp decline in socio-cultural life has created a
vacuum that is being filled by religious missionaries… The lack of action of
the Pakistani government to support the development of cultural industries,
together with the lack of a strategy on the part of the incumbent provincial
government to redress the situation, has washed away any other hope for the
revival of music and cultural life in Swat,” the study said.[19]
It documented the end of public concerts, the demise of
scores of families of artists, the closure of almost 200 CD shops and dozens of
cinemas and the professional death of actors and performers.
Clerics set fire
in cinemas and exhibition centres. They smashed billboards that displayed
females' images.[20]
Police harassed cultural institutions across the Swat valley. Missionaries
targeted dancing and music at weddings and other events. They argued
convincingly in mosques and in street encounters that performances were sinful
and that those involved would not only be condemned to hell in life after
death. People’s suffering, they reasoned, was God’s punishment for their
immoral practices.
Their campaigns were part of Pakistani President General Zia
ul-Haq’s Saudi-backed effort to Islamicize Pakistani society and erode secular
or more liberal religious expressions of culture. “The school curriculum was
designed on the basis of Islamic values and morality. Free expression and
creative thinking were discouraged. Music was considered immoral. ‘The State TV
channel removed music videos. Instead, Islamic shows held sway. Artistic
expressions in all forms were discouraged by various means such as new
taxation, ‘forcefully imposed on the film industry’… This new phase introduced
the culture of the madrassa and Jihadi literature in Swat, with an education
curriculum that glorified Jihad and promoted extremism,” the study said. Swat
Valley counted by 2005 225 madrassahs with thousands of students educated with
no marketable skills but those qualifying them to become imams or religious
teachers. “Madrassa graduates’ mind-sets have little to appreciate or even
tolerate art and secular values in society,” the study added.[21]
Notions of government inertia if not complicity in branches
in which Saudi-backed worldviews have made significant inroads are fuelled by the
fact that security forces seldom capture the killers of artists and cultural
workers or bombers of shops and cinemas. On the contrary, those branches of
government frequently adopt policies that contribute to an environment of
increased intolerance. Victims and their families are left to their own devices
and often reduced to abject poverty. Islamic scholars who cross
ultra-conservative red lines are disciplined by the religious affairs ministry.
Religious affairs minister Sardar Yousuf suspended Deobandi
Mufti Abdul Qavi, a representative of the ulema in former cricket player Imran
Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, in June 2016 after a picture of
him and Qandeel Baloch, a Pakistani Kim Kardashian who achieved stardom as a
drama queen with videos of her daily life that often tackled controversial
issues, went viral on social media. The picture, in which Baloch donned the
mufti’s cap, was taken during an iftar, the breaking of the Ramadan fast, in a
hotel room during which the two discussed Islam. Yousuf suspended Qavi’s
membership in the committee that sights the new moon to announce the beginning
of Muslim holy days as well as a committee populated by representatives of
madrassahs as the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami party that issues fatwas.[22]
Qavi was no stranger to controversy. The scholar claims to
be a major spiritual influence in the life of controversial Pakistani actress,
TV host and model Veena Malik whom he first met when the two clashed on live
television. Malik caused a stir when she appeared nude on the cover of FHM
magazine’s India edition with the initials ISI of Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence agency written on her forearm. Malik and her businessman husband
Asad Bashir Khan fled in 2014 to Dubai after they were sentenced together with
a TV host to 26 years in prison by an anti-terrorism court on charges of
blasphemy for re-enacting their wedding in a scene that against the backdrop of
religious music seemed to be loosely based on the marriage of the Prophet
Muhammad’s daughter.[23]
Returning to Pakistan two years later, Malik and her husband announced during a
visit to Karachi’s Jamia Binoria al Aalmia, a major Deobandi mosque and
seminary that propagates Saudi-backed ultra-conservative that she intended to
enrol in the institution to get an Islamic education.[24]
Conclusion
It took the Al Qaeda bombings of residential complexes in
Saudi Arabia in 2003 and 2004 as well as a year-long running battle between
security forces and the jihadists rather than the 9/11 attacks in New York and
Washington, D.C. to persuade the Saudis to really take control of funding of
soft power assets worldwide by banning charity donations in mosques, putting
the various charities under a central organisation, controlling the transfer of
funds abroad, and working with the United States and others to clean out some
of the charities - or
like in the case of Al Haramain -
close them down.[25]
The problem was that by that time it was too late; the genie
was already out of the bottle. At the same time, the soft power /proselytization
campaign still served and serves the purpose of countering Iran as Saudi Arabia
battles the Islamic republic r for regional hegemony.
The question is how long Saudi Arabia can afford the cost of
its support of ultra-conservatism. The domestic, foreign policy and
reputational cost of the Al Saud’s marriage to Wahhabism is changing the cost
benefit analysis. Tumbling commodity and energy prices are forcing the Saudi
government to reform, diversify, streamline and rationalise the kingdom’s
economy. Reform that enables the kingdom to become a competitive, 21st
century knowledge economy is however difficult, if not impossible, as long as
it is held back by the strictures of a religious doctrine that looks backwards
rather than forwards, and whose ideal is the emulation of life as it was at the
time of the Prophet and His Companions.
Moreover, the rise of IS has sparked unprecedented
international scrutiny of Saudi-backed ultra-conservative interpretations of
Islam such as Wahhabism and Salafism, that is causing Saudi Arabia significant
reputational damage. Increasingly Saudi Arabia’s roots are being seen as
similar to those of IS, and the kingdom is viewed as what IS will look like if
it survives US-led and Russian military efforts to destroy it.
In sum, the complex relationship between the Al Sauds and
Wahhabism creates policy dilemmas for the Saudi government on multiple levels,
complicates its relationship with the United States, as well as its approach
towards the multiple crises in the Middle East and North Africa. The Al Sauds’
problems are multiplied by the fact that Saudi Arabia’s clergy is tying itself
into knots as a result of its sell-out to the regime and its close ideological
affinity to more militant strands of Islam.
Ultimately, Wahhabism is not what’s going to win Saudi
Arabia lasting regional hegemony in the Middle East and North Africa. Yet, the
Al Sauds may not have a secure way of restructuring their relationship to
Wahhabism. As a result, the Al Saud’s future is clouded in uncertainty, no more
so than if they lose Wahhabism as the basis for the legitimacy of their
absolute rule.
The at times devastating fallout of Saudi Arabia’s soft
power efforts is visible in Muslim communities across the globe, nowhere more
so than in Pakistan. Similarly, the fallout of the inevitable restructuring of
relations between the Al Sauds and the kingdom’s ultra-conservative ulema is
likely to reverberate beyond the Middle East and North Africa in the Muslim
world at large, including in South and Southeast Asia.
Dr. James M.
Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies,
co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, and the
author of The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog and a just published book with the same title
[1]
Raza Khan, Scuffle breaks out between Maulana Sherani, Ashrafi during CII
meeting, Dawn, 29 December 2015, http://www.dawn.com/news/1229401
[2]
Interview with the author, 16 June 2016
[3]
Benazir Shah and Abid Hussain, Does Pakistan Need An Islamic Council? The
Caravan, 6 June 2016, http://www.caravanmagazine.in/vantage/pakistan-need-islamic-council#sthash.Tm366VHG.dpuf
[4]
Tahir Mehdi, Reproductive violence, Dawn, 7 June 2016, http://www.dawn.com/news/1263136/reproductive-violence
[5]
Benazir Jatoi, Punjab’s attempt as Protecting Women, The Express Tribune, 17
June 2016, http://tribune.com.pk/story/1124234/punjabs-attempt-protecting-women/
[6]
Kathy Gannon, In Pakistan, gruesome ‘honour’ killings bring a new backlash,
Associated Press, 4 July 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-pakistan-gruesome-honor-killings-bring-a-new-backlash/2016/07/04/0cfa3e24-41ae-11e6-a76d-3550dba926ac_story.html?postshare=9971467696176656&tid=ss_tw
[7]
Amir Wasim, CII Blamed for rise in incidents, Dawn, 10 June 2016, http://www.dawn.com/news/1263920/cii-blamed-for-rise-in-incidents-of-violence-against-women
[8]
I. A. Rehman, The roots of misogyny, Dawn, 16 June 2016, http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/06/the-roots-of-misogyny/
[9]
Maryam Usman, Bill aiming to ban child marriages shot down, The Express
Tribune, 15 January 2016, http://tribune.com.pk/story/1027742/settled-matter-bill-aiming-to-ban-child-marriages-shot-down/
[10]
Farahnaz Ispahani, Purifying the Land of the Pure: Pakistan's Religious
Minorities, New Delhi: Harper Collins India, 2016, Kindle edition
[11]
Ibid. Shah and Hussain
[12]
Zia Ur Rahman, Fresh efforts being made to affiliate madrassas with PMEB, The
News, 26 June 2015, http://www.thenews.com.pk/print/47930-fresh-efforts-being-made-to-affiliate-madrassas-with-pmeb
[13]
Imtiaz Ali, Famed qawwal Amjad Sabri gunned down in Karachi, Dawn, 22 June 2016,
http://www.dawn.com/news/1266514/famed-qawwal-amjad-sabri-gunned-down-in-karachi
[14]
Saadat Hasan Manto, By the Grace of God (Allah ka bara fazal hay) in Amjad
Tufail (ed), Complete and Authentic collection of Manto's works (Mustanad aur
Jama'y Kuliat e Manto), Edition 6, Islamabad: Narratives, 2012, p. 254-258
[15]
Steve Chao, Pakistan – Music Under Siege, Al Jazeera, 101 East, 20 October
2015, http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/101east/2015/10/pakistan-music-siege-151020115104964.html
[16]
Ibid. Chao
[17]
Anne Garrels, Taliban Threats, Attacks Silence Pakistani Singer, National
Public Radio, 12 March 2009, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101733831
[18]
Ibid. Chao
[19]
Muhammad Rome, Study on Effects of War and Repression on Musicians, Performers,
and the Public of Swat, Pakistan, Pakhtunkhwa Cultural Foundation/Freemuse, 3
March 2016, http://www.freemuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Swat-report2016.pdf
[20]
Mohammad Shehzad, Pakistan: MMA to ban women's photography, dance and music,
Women Living Under Muslim Laws, 24 February 2005, http://www.wluml.org/node/1905
[21]
Ibid. Rome
[22]
Fayyaz Hussain, What really happened when Mufti Abdul Qavi broke his fast with
Qandeel Baloch in a hotel? Daily Pakistan, 20 June 2016, http://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/lifestyle/real-story-of-mufti-qavis-breaks-fast-with-qandeel-balcoh/
[23]
Catherine Shoard, Bollywood star Veena Malik handed 26-year sentence for
'blasphemous' wedding scene, The Guardian, 27 November 2014, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/nov/27/bollywood-veena-malik-sentenced-26-years-jail-religious-blasphemy-wedding
[24]
Naeem Sahoutara, Veena Malik seeks to join Jamia Binoria for Islamic education,
The Express Tribune, 7 May 2016, http://tribune.com.pk/story/1098873/veena-malik-seeks-to-join-jamia-binoria-for-islamic-education/
[25]Glenn
R. Simpson, Saudi Arabia to Shut Down Group/ Assets of Former Director of al
Haramain Frozen: Potential Links to al Qaeda, The Wall Street Journal, 3 June 2004.
Comments
Post a Comment