EURO 2020 set to polish Turkey’s tarnished image
By James M. Dorsey
Turkey, eager to polish its image tarnished by a politicized
match-fixing scandal, a massive corruption scandal, hard-handed police tactics
against anti-government demonstrators and a bruising domestic power struggle,
has emerged as a favourite to host the
Euro 2020 semi-finals and final.
"We think we will be awarded the two semi-finals and
finals and we deserve it after bidding for the last three tournaments. It's
high time we were successful and UEFA president Michel Platini has given that hint
to us," Turkish Football Federation (TFF) vice-president Servet Yardimci
told Inside
World Football.
Brutal police tactics last June against anti-government demonstrators
on Istanbul’s iconic Taksim Square protesting against plans to replace the
square’s historic Gezi Park with a shopping mall cost Turkey the hosting of the
2020 Olympic Games that were awarded to Tokyo instead. Militant soccer fans
played a key role in the protests, the largest in Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan’s more than a decade in power.
Turkey’s soccer image had already been tarnished by the time
the protests erupted by a massive match-fixing scandal that escalated into a struggle
between Mr. Erdogan and Fethullalh Gulen, a self-exiled 73-year old imam, for
the favour of fans in a soccer-crazy country and control of Istanbul’s
Fenerbahce SK, the crown jewel in Turkish soccer with the country’s largest fan
base.
Turkey’s image was further sullied by a massive corruption
scandal in December to which Mr. Erdogan responded by moving thousands of
suspected followers of Mr. Gulen in the police and the judiciary to other jobs
in a bid to control the graft enquiry. Mr. Erdogan’s further moves to control
the Internet where leaks of potentially damaging evidence of corruption appeared
regularly and make the judiciary subservient to the government have partially
been reversed by the courts.
To top it all off, an article by investigative journalist
Seymour M. Hersh in the London
Review of Books earlier this month asserted that last August’s chemical
weapons attack on the outskirts of Damascus that brought the United States
within inches of military intervention in Syria was the work of Syrian rebels
aided by Turkey in a bid to force the US to take military action.
Long a proponent of US military action, Turkey had hoped
that US intervention would salvage its failed Syria policy that together with
the toppling of the elected Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt has cost it
loss of influence and prestige across the Middle East and North Africa. Mr.
Hersh argued that Turkish–US relations have been strained as a result of the
last minute US doubts about Syrian government responsibility, reinforced by Syria’s
agreement to surrender its chemical weapons.
Winning the hosting of the EURO 2020 semi-finals and finals
would project Turkey in a very different light and distract from the widely
criticised authoritarian turn Mr. Erdogan has taken in recent years. It would
also reinforce a resounding victory for Mr. Erdogan’s ruling Justice and
Development Party (AKP) in last month’s municipal elections that has left his
opponents licking their wounds.
The hosting would further boost Turkey in its unspoken rivalry
with Qatar for regional influence. Both nations employ sports alongside a
global airline and the arts as tools of their projection in a friendly
competition in which Turkey unlike Qatar brings to bear a sizeable country with
one of the world’s 20 largest economies, a history of empire and historic ties
to the Middle East, Africa, Europe and Asia.
While the electoral victory likely strengthens Turkey’s hand
against its competitors for the EURO 2020, soccer fans who regularly stage
protests in stadia and denounce Mr. Erdogan as a thief because of his alleged
involvement in the corruption scandal could cast a shadow over the Turkish bid.
So could the fact that last year’s Under-20 FIFA World Cup attracted
disappointing spectator numbers.
Similarly, Mr. Erdogan’s retaliation against legendary
former soccer player Hakan Sukur, a supporter of Mr. Gulen, is unlikely to help
the Turkish bid. Municipal officials this month removed Mr. Sukur’s nameplate from
Istanbul’s Sancaktepe Hakan Sukur Stadium and the prime minister demanded that
he resign his seat as a member of parliament.
Mr. Sukur was recruited by Mr. Erdogan and elected on the
AKP ticket in 2011 but resigned in December from the party in protest against the
prime minister’s efforts to close down prep schools operated by Mr. Gulen’s Hizmet
movement. Mr. Sukur, viewed as the best soccer player of his generation if not
in Turkish football history, remains an independent member of parliament.
Similarly, alleged political interference in soccer could
damage the Turkish bid. Critics of Mr. Erdogan charge that the AKP last September
engineered the storming of the pitch by rival fans during a derby between
Istanbul rivals Besiktas and Galatasary in an effort to further curtail Carsi,
the militant and widely popular Besiktas support group that played a key role
in last year’s anti-government protests. They point to the fact security was
lax at the match and that a youth leader of the AKP boasted on Facebook how he
had obtained a free ticket to the derby and was one of the first to invade the
pitch.
Turkish journalist Mehmet Baransu moreover documented links
between the AKP and 1453 Kartallari (1453 Eagles), a rival conservative Besiktas
support group named in commemoration of the year that Ottoman Sultan Fatih the
Conqueror drove the Byzantines out of Constantinople,. 1453 members reportedly
shouted ‘God is Great’ and attacked Carsi supporters during the pitch invasion.
James M. Dorsey is a Senior Fellow at the S.
Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological
University. He is also co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute
for Fan Culture, and the author of The Turbulent World of Middle East
Soccer blog and a forthcoming book with the same
title.
Comments
Post a Comment