Trump’s Middle East reality check
By James M. Dorsey
Thank you for joining me today.
The rise of
Artificial Intelligence magnifies the importance of journalists with true
expertise, top-notch sourcing, and historical depth. These journalists, like
me, tell and analyse in-depth stories. Their goal is to enhance their readers
and listeners’ ability to form informed opinions of their own.
We don’t just
chronicle events. Our reporting and analysis are shaped by years of
on-the-ground coverage, expertise, and historical knowledge. In my case, I have
covered geopolitics, the Middle East, and the Muslim world for decades, having
been based in multiple countries, including Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran,
the UAE, Lebanon, Kuwait, and Turkey.
Hard-hitting
reporting and analysis that lets the chips fall where they may is even more
critical in a world of brutal wars, unimaginable humanitarian crises, and
increasing authoritarianism.
That is The
Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey’s mission since its inception 15 years
ago.
Thousands
worldwide are avid readers and listeners of The Turbulent World. Join them in
helping to maintain and expand the column and podcast by becoming a paid
supporter by clicking here.
Subscribing allows you to participate
in a poll, listen to the podcast, watch the video, access the archive, post
comments, and direct message me with your questions.
US President Donald Trump may think his 20-point proposal will
end the Gaza war and solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but reality on the
ground suggests otherwise.
To be sure, Mr. Trump's proposal is the only game in
town, if only because no one, not Israel, not the Palestinians, who
weren't consulted, not the Arab states, wants to get on the wrong side of the
president.
While all welcomed Mr. Trump's proposal, a set of
principles with no terms or mechanism for implementation, no one has
wholeheartedly bought into the scheme.
Israel has so far endorsed
only the first phase of the proposal, involving a fragile
ceasefire, an exchange of Hamas-held alive and dead captives for Palestinians
incarcerated in Israeli prisons and Palestinian corpses in Israeli custody, and
a partial withdrawal of Israeli forces in Gaza.
US Vice President J.D. Vance and negotiators Steve
Witkoff and Jared Kushner are in Israel to prevent the already disrupted
ceasefire from breaking down and to nudge
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to engage in a second phase
that would involve post-war security and governance arrangements in Gaza.
Hamas
has released the remaining 20 living hostages, returned 13
bodies of dead captives it has been able to find under the rubble in Gaza, and
is searching for the outstanding 15 corpses.
The group has also agreed that it will not be part of a
post-war Gaza administration.
Even so, Hamas has rejected key elements of the proposal,
such as disarmament of the group, and insisted
that non-aligned Palestinian technocrats should govern Gaza in advance of
elections with no international oversight.
Hamas has also rejected the idea of an
Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement, saying it would only agree to a long-term
ceasefire with the Jewish-majority state.
Speaking
at the inauguration of a US military coordination centre in
Israel, Mr. Vance insisted that Hamas would have to disarm, but refrained from
setting a deadline. He also stopped short of reiterating Israel’s goal of
destroying Hamas.
“Hamas has to disarm… Hamas actually has to behave
itself, and that Hamas, while all the fighters can be given some sort of
clemency, they’re not going to be able to kill each other and they’re not going
to be able to kill the Palestinians,” Mr. Vance said.
At the same time, Mr. Kushner said there would be no
funding for reconstruction in areas controlled by Hamas.
For their part, Arab and Muslim states want to see a
reformed Palestine Authority involved in post-war Gaza to lend the process
legitimacy. The West Bank-based, internationally recognised representative of
the Palestinians is widely seen as corrupt and ineffective.
Moreover, wealthy Gulf states are unlikely to fund the
reconstruction of the territory that Israel’s military has turned into a moon
landscape without credible assurances that the post-war process will not
disintegrate into renewed hostilities.
Complicating matters is the fact that Mr. Trump and
Israel's approach to ending the war and resolving the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict once and for all, authored by Mr. Kushner during the president’s first
term in office, is at loggerheads with what the rest of the international
community, including the Palestinians, the Arabs, the Muslim world, China,
Russia, and Europe, envisions.
In contrast with the international community that sees
the creation of an independent Palestinian state as the solution, the Trump
administration, backed by Israel, has backed away from a two-state solution, believing
instead that economic development will be the panacea.
In doing so, it reversed three decades of US backing for a two-state solution, involving the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.
“The biggest message that we've tried to convey to the
Israeli leadership now is that, now that the war is over, if you want to
integrate Israel with the broader Middle East, you have to find
a way to help the Palestinian people thrive and do better,”
Mr. Kushner said in a recent CBS 60 Minutes interview.
Compounding obstacles to the implementation of the Trump
proposal, Hamas, unlike the United States and Israel, and despite suffering
enormous body blows during the war, was prepared for the day the guns would
fall silent.
Body blows are nothing new for Hamas, even if the group
suffered the most in the latest war. Israel has targeted, detained, and
assassinated its leaders for more than two decades and has fought five wars
with Hamas since 2008.
Rather than committing all its resources to a war it
could not win, Hamas kept thousands of activists in reserve for the day it
hoped to reestablish control in those parts of Gaza from which Israel would
withdraw.
Moreover, Hamas benefitted from the fact that Gazan clans
and criminal gangs that Israel armed failed to confront Hamas and take control
of areas from which Israel withdrew as part of the ceasefire.
As a result, Hamas was able to reassert brutally its
authority in areas from which Israel withdrew.
The clans and gangs either disbanded when the ceasefire
took effect last week or were confronted and suppressed by Hamas, which
demonstrated a degree of control and command Israel thought it had destroyed
during the war.
Israeli officials fear that the possible inclusion of
Turkey in an international stabilisation force that, if and when it is
established, would maintain security in those parts of post-war Gaza from which
Israel withdraws, could back Hamas in its effort to retain control.
Mr. Vance said Israel would have to agree to the
composition of the force. “We’re not going to force anything on our Israeli
friends when it comes to foreign troops on their soil. But we do think there is
a constructive role for the Turks to play,” he said.
A mediator, alongside the United States, Qatar, and
Egypt, Turkey endorsed the Trump proposal, which includes a call for the
disarmament of Hamas, even though it tacitly allows the group's exiled members
to travel in and out of Turkey and spend months at a time in Istanbul.
Early in the war, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
asserted that "Hamas is not a terrorist organisation, it is a
liberation group, 'mujahideen' waging a battle to protect its
lands and people."
That didn't stop Israel from acceding to a
Turkish request earlier this month to allow 66 Palestinians,
some of whom have Turkish citizenship or family ties to Turkey, to leave Gaza.
They included 16 relatives of former Hamas leader and chief negotiator Ismail
Haniyeh.
Israel sees the gesture as a way of improving relations
with Turkey in advance of the country possibly playing an on-the-ground role in
post-war Gaza.
Israel assassinated Mr. Haniyeh in Tehran in July of last
year. The Israeli military killed three of Mr. Haniyeh's sons and four of
his grandchildren in an air strike on their car in Gaza three months earlier.
Significantly, Turkey is one of four non-Arab Muslim
countries, together with Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and Qatar, that has expressed a
potential interest in contributing to the stabilisation force that Egypt could
lead.
Even so, contributors would need the fig leaf of an
invitation by the Palestine Authority.
With Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu opposing
the Authority's involvement in post-war Gaza and the US and Israel focussing on
economics and reconstruction of Gaza rather than Palestinian national
aspirations, that could prove another hard nut to crack.
In the ultimate analysis, ending the Gaza war, let alone
resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, hinges on the Trump administration
remaining engaged in the process and willing to pressure Israel to make a
180-degree political U-turn.
Given the administration's track record and backing away
from the notion of an independent Palestinian state as the resolution of the
conflict, and the opposition of a majority of Israelis to a Palestinian
state, the odds are that the Trump proposal, at best, will lead to a lull for
whatever period rather than a sustainable end to hostilities.
This story is being simultaneously published
by WhoWhatWhy.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at
Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International
Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and podcast, The
Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.

Comments
Post a Comment