The Greater Middle East is a ticking time bomb -Part 1.
By James M. Dorsey
Please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Paid subscribers
help me cover the cost of contributing fact-based analysis and understanding to
a debate that has become increasingly polarised and weaponised. To become a
paid subscriber, please click on the subscription button at http://www.jamesmdorsey.substack.com
and choose one of the subscription options. Thank you.
To watch a video version of
this story or listen to an audio podcast click here.
The Greater Middle East is a ticking time bomb.
The region’s most apparent powder keg – the risk of a
regional conflagration between Israel and Iran that could draw the United
States and regional countries like Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Yemen, and Gulf
states into the conflict – is foremost on policy and opinion makers’ minds. So
is the war in Gaza with its devastating humanitarian fallout.
Yet, simmering at the surface in Gaza and across much of the
Middle East and North Africa is social, economic, and political anger and
frustration that could erupt at any moment but may not immediately manifest
itself publicly.
This two-part series explores developments autocratic Arab
rulers and US policymakers ignore at their peril. This two-part series explores
developments autocratic Arab rulers and US policymakers ignore at their peril.
The series is based on an essay published in Horizons.
Part 1 looks at the region as a whole as well as Hamas’
standing in Gaza eight months into the war. Part 2 focuses on the war’s
potential fallout in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt.
Scholars and analysts suggest public anger over the Gaza war
could reverse youth disengagement from politics after two waves of mass
anti-government protests in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Iraq, Algeria, and Sudan
that bookended the 2010s failed to produce real change.
Thousands
rally in support of Palestine in Rabat, Morrocco. Credit: AFP
“Arab regimes have always been threatened
by popular dissent, the Gaza carnage notwithstanding, but now they are
pushing back harshly against public protests of their own citizens across the
Arab world, including in Amman, Cairo, Manama, and Rabat,” said Emile Nakhleh,
the retired founding director of the CIA's Political Islam Strategic Analysis
Program.
“Arab regimes are fearful that these pro-Palestinian
protests that are denouncing the Israeli-inflicted destruction of the Gaza
Strip and demanding a ceasefire could easily turn against them,” Mr. Nakhleh
added.
Middle Eastern youth attitudes toward temporal and religious
authority mirror youth approaches toward material concerns.
The younger generation’s world focuses on the individual
rather than the collective, on ‘what’s
in it for me?’ instead of ‘what’s in it for us?’
Algerians
demand change in 2019 protests. Credit: World Bank
“Arabs
know what they want and what they do not want. They want their basic needs
for jobs, education, and health care to be attended to, and they want good
governance and protection of their personal rights," said James Zogby, an
Arab-American pollster with a decades-long track record of polling in the
Middle East and North Africa.
Autocratic Middle Eastern rulers bet on economic development
and transformation, producing vibrant and resilient economies that cater to
youth aspirations. However, transitions are seldom a straight shot and are more
often than not a process of two steps forward and one step back. In addition,
there is no guarantee of success.
The consequence of failure “is truly daunting: a lost
generation that feels some combination of disaffection and desperation, unable
to escape stagnant economies, smouldering on the humiliation of losing both
security and status from childhood,” said Middle East scholar Jon Alterman.
Mr. Alterman warned that in much of the Middle East and
North Africa, “conditions may get worse before they get better.” He noted that
countries forced to turn to international lenders for help would have to limit
subsidies to already hard-hit middle classes.
Similarly, it is only a matter of time before wealthy Gulf
states will have to reduce incentives intended to persuade youth to seek
employment in the private sector rather than the government.
“The growing frustration among the Arab public against the
injustice facing the Palestinians and the increased capabilities of the
Iranian-backed non-state actors are the
perfect recipe for chaos to erupt across the Middle East,” said Kuwaiti
sociologist Mohammad Al-Rumaihi.
Generations in war-wracked Palestine, Syria, Yemen, and
Sudan, and bankrupt Lebanon have little, if anything, to look forward to.
Similarly, discontent is mounting and could explode anytime in countries like
Jordan, Egypt, and Iran.
The carnage
of the Gaza war has galvanized public opinion. Credit: CBC
Palestine is a pressure cooker and often catalyzes the
expression of unrelated discontent elsewhere in the region.
Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7 of last year and
Israel’s response have returned the Palestinian cause to the top of the region
and much of the world’s agenda and mobilized civil society in a swath of land
stretching from Morocco on the Atlantic coast of Africa to Iraq.
In doing so, Palestine threatens to reignite anger and
frustrations that have been building up for years.
“The region has failed to respond to the demands of its
younger populations. This has left younger Middle Easterners more frustrated,
angrier, and readier to reject the parameters of incremental change, growing
more vocally towards complete upheaval and regime change, even with the failed
uprisings of 2011 behind them,” warned political and development consultant
Hafsa Halawi, more than year before the Gaza war.
Youth in Gaza has known little other than two decades of
wars, blockades, and sieges. Beyond the trauma of the latest Gaza war, the
Strip’s next generation is likely to experience at least a decade of a slow
rebuilding of their lives that were shattered at birth.
“What will
become of Gaza? Will we go back to work?... How will Gaza be rebuilt? Is
the destruction too great? How long will it take? Will we live the rest of our
lives without education and healthcare?” asked Gazan journalist Ruwaida Kamal
Amer.
“Not a single university is left in Gaza. It will take years
to rebuild the education system,” a senior United Nations Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs official noted.
Hamas
spokesman Osama Hamdan discusses Hamas apology. Source: Facebook
Ms. Amer’s questions go to the core of mounting Gazan
criticism of Hamas for provoking the Israeli assault that has devastated Gaza
and reduced its 2.3 million inhabitants to destitution. The criticism, despite
Hamas’ efforts to suppress expressions of dissent, does not mean that
widespread support for armed struggle against Israel has diminished.
Nevertheless, Hamas felt compelled in March to issue a lengthy
statement apologising to Gazans for their suffering. The group thanked
Gazans for their resilience and acknowledged their “exhaustion.” It said it was
trying to alleviate the “difficulties” Gazans faced by, among others,
attempting to impose “price controls,” but its capabilities were limited
“because of the ongoing aggression.”
Prices in Gaza have shot up astronomically, with, for
example, 30 eggs that cost US$2-3 before the war selling for US35-40. However,
prices have begun to drop with the recent increased flow of food into Gaza.
Hamas said it was discussing ways to “resolve the problems
caused by the (Israeli) occupation” with other armed factions, popular
committees, and “families,” a reference to clans that Israel has sought to
engage in creating an alternative post-war governance structure for Gaza.
At the same time, the statement reiterated that the war
would ultimately achieve Palestinian “victory and freedom.”
The statement suggests that criticism in Gaza has reached a
level that worries Hamas, even if it is difficult to gauge public sentiment
accurately. The Palestine Center for Policy and Survey
Research produces what may be the only credible regular public opinion
polling in Gaza and the West Bank.
Source Palestine
Center for Policy and Survey Research
Fifty-two per cent of Gaza respondents to the Center’s latest survey said they
favoured a return to Hamas rule as opposed to an administration by the West
Bank-based, internationally recognised Palestine Authority, an Arab
peacekeeping force, the United Nations, or Israel.
The Center’s polling suggested that Gazan public opinion was
split on Hamas but left assessments of the strength of anti-Hamas sentiment to
anecdotal evidence.
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, an anti-Hamas Palestinian-American who
hails from Gaza, keeps close contact with the Strip and says he has lost 31
relatives in the seven-month-old Gaza war, described the complexity of
evaluating the evidence.
“So many Gazans are
forced to use aliases and hide their true identities when speaking out
against Hamas & the horrendous impact of life under the Islamist group's
violent and authoritarian rule… Conformity is strictly enforced; differing
views and alternative opinions will not be tolerated and could result in
harassment, attacks, delegitimization, and even violence,” Mr. Alkhatib said.
Mr. AlKhatib’s portrayal likely speaks to the fear Hamas has
instilled in Gazans since it took control of Gaza in 2006. While the group may
be able to lash out at some critics since the war erupted, it’s hard to see how
it can effectively impose its will while under Israeli assault and siege and
hiding in underground tunnels.
Gazan hopelessness threatens to be the lightning rod for
widespread social, economic, and political discontent across the Middle East
and North Africa that could transition into militancy against the perceived
double standards of the West as well as that of the region’s rulers.
Dr.
James M. Dorsey is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological
University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and the author of
the syndicated column and podcast, The Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.
Comments
Post a Comment