Netanyahu borrows time by rejecting Gaza ceasefire.
By James M. Dorsey
I hope you enjoy today’s column and podcast. Please consider
becoming a paid subscriber. Paid subscribers help me cover the cost of
contributing fact-based analysis and understanding to a debate that has become
increasingly polarised and weaponised. To become a paid subscriber, please
click on the subscription button at http://www.jamesmdorsey.substack.com
and choose one of the subscription options. Thank you.
To
watch a video version of this story or listen to an audio podcast click here.
This week’s Gazan short-lived celebration of a
ceasefire that was not to be, highlights what is at stake in the
seven-month-old war and Israel’s refusal to end the carnage.
Thousands poured into Gazan streets within minutes of Hamas advising it had accepted a Qatar and Egyptian ceasefire proposal.
“We have shown the world that we survived this war as
Palestinians. We stood our ground on our land. We survived 212 days of attacks
and devastation by the world’s most advanced weapons. We did not leave. We
survived on our own with no help from outside,” said Ahmad, a young Gazan, one
of the thousands celebrating in the streets of Rafah Hamas’ acceptance of a
ceasefire with Israel.
The celebrations were short-lived. They dissipated 90
minutes later as Israel made clear its rejection of the proposal.
“The Hamas proposal is far from meeting Israel's core
demands,” Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s office said in a statement.
Not to be painted as the party pooper, the statement added
that Israel would “dispatch a ranking delegation to Egypt in an effort to
maximize the possibility of reaching an agreement on terms acceptable to
Israel.”
Mr. Netanyahu is going through the motions as he lays the
groundwork for what could be a final major offensive in the southern Gazan
enclave of Rafah against Hamas that could
determine his chances of political survival.
Rafah is Mr. Netanyahu’s desperate attempt at achieving war
goals he has failed to realise in seven months of unrelenting military
operations at an unspeakable cost to innocent Palestinians.
These goals include the destruction of Hamas, symbolised by
the elimination of its military force; the killing or capture of its top
leadership; the release of the remaining Hamas-held hostages kidnapped by the
group during its October 7 attack on Israel; and ensuring that Gaza will be
longer serve as a launching pad for Palestinian resistance.
Hamas continues to play whack-a-mole
with Israel despite having suffered severe losses. The group’s Gaza-based
leadership remains intact and in control, and roughly half of the 250 people
initially kidnapped by Hamas were freed as a result of a
one-week ceasefire in November, not because of Israeli military action.
Moreover, Israel believes that Hamas’ leadership, including
Yahya Sinwar, Israel’s most wanted man, is hiding in tunnels under Rafah
shielded by the remaining hostages.
Even so, Mr. Netanyahu is living politically on borrowed
time, irrespective of whether he succeeds in Gaza or not. Israeli opinion polls
suggest that Mr. Netanyahu and his ultra-nationalist, ultra-conservative
coalition partners would lose
the next election.
Israelis
demand acceptance of ceasefire deal. Source: The Times
Hundreds of angry
protesters in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem denounced the government’s rejection
of the ceasefire proposal. They called on Mr. Netanyahu to prioritise the
release of Hamas-held hostages by accepting the deal.
Instead, Israeli forces on Tuesday took control
of the Rafah side of the Gaza-Egyptian border and closed the border
crossing crucial to the flow of desperately needed humanitarian supplies in the
Strip as Israeli tanks pushed into the city of Rafah itself.
Mr. Netanyahu’s rejection of the deal while going through
the motions of negotiations and his impending Rafah offensive, at best, buys
him time.
Even so, by accepting a ceasefire, Hamas threw a curveball
at Mr. Netanyahu as well as the Biden administration.
The acceptance put the shoe on Mr. Netanyahu’s foot and the
administration on the spot. The Biden administration has repeatedly publicly
opposed a massive military operation in Rafah, home to more than a million
Palestinians displaced by the war.
Hamas
negotiator Khalil al-Hayya. Credit: AP
The irony is that Hamas offered Mr. Netanyahu and the
administration a way out by leaking
details of the ceasefire and prisoner exchange proposal it had accepted
that made clear that it was not a deal Israel would accept.
At the same time, it allowed Hamas to project itself as
engaging constructively in negotiations.
The leaks suggested, against all evidence from Jerusalem,
that Israel would agree to a permanent rather than a temporary ceasefire, an
end to the war, and a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.
They also inferred that US President Joe Biden had accepted
Hamas’ demand that the United States would guarantee implementation of the
deal.
“The essential aim of the deal is a permanent ceasefire and
full withdrawal” of Israeli forces from Gaza, senior Hamas negotiator Khali al
Hayaa told Al Jazeera. “We did what we are supposed to do. The onus is on the
mediators and the international community,” Mr. Al-Hayya added.
Hamas’ acceptance of a ceasefire proposal it knew Israel
would reject raises the tantalising question of whether Mr. Netanyahu may not
be the only one allegedly wanting to prolong the war for personal political
gain.
The same could be true for his nemesis, Mr. Sinwar, even if
one can also wonder why he would agree to a deal that gives license to Israel’s
effort to destroy Hamas by agreeing to a post-ceasefire continuation of the
war.
Nevertheless, the short-lived Gazan celebrations and the
fact that a ceasefire means to Gazans more than just an end to the death,
destitution, and destruction in the Strip suggests that it could create a
reckoning not only for Mr. Netanyahu but also for Mr. Sinwar.
Gazans want to extract a price for the suffering inflicted
upon them. The devastation of their lives has not dampened Palestinian national
aspirations, even if they are desperate for immediate relief.
Hamas Gaza
leader Yahya Sinwar feels the heat. Credit: AP
Even so, Mr. Sinwar and Hamas are feeling the heat of
growing criticism of the group for provoking the Israeli assault that has
devastated Gaza and reduced its 2.3 million inhabitants to destitution.
In late March, Hamas felt compelled to issue
a lengthy statement apologising to Gazans for their suffering, despite
52 per cent of Gazans favouring a
return to post-war Hamas rule as opposed to the West Bank-based,
internationally recognised Palestine Authority, an Arab peacekeeping force, the
United Nations, or Israel.
It’s a choice between what Palestinians perceive as bad
alternatives. It also opts, against all odds, for the party most vigorous in
defending Palestinian rights and aspirations.
Prominent Israeli columnist Anschel Pfeffer argued that “it
is looking increasingly unlikely that Hamas' chief in Gaza and the man who
calls the shots on any deal, Yahya Sinwar, is prepared to agree to any
compromise that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can accept. Both men are
determined to emerge with a perception of victory in their grasp – but there
doesn't appear to be any framework in which the two can have that.”
Even so, Mr. Pfeffer noted, “Israelis and Gazans aren't
stupid. Most of them have conceded that they have lost too much for there to be
any notion of ‘victory’ in this war. But as long as their fates are controlled
by two men who insist on being the victor at any cost, this war is going to
continue.”
Dr. James M. Dorsey
is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam
School of International Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and podcast,
The
Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.
Comments
Post a Comment