Keep the World Cup in Qatar even if it bought its way in (JMD in Arab Weekly)

Keep the World Cup in Qatar even if it bought its way in
Instead of having amassed soft power, Qatar confronts multiple threats to its World Cup hosting rights.

 2015/06/05  Issue: 8  Page: 15

 The Arab Weekly

 James M. Dorsey

US and Swiss investi­gations into corrup­tion in FIFA and the awarding of World Cup tournaments to Russia and Qatar are likely to force Qatar to provide chapter and verse about its bid rather than allow it to stick to its tired reiteration that it did nothing wrong, will cooperate with any and every inquiry and that allegations against the Gulf state are rooted in racism.
Former Qatari prime minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani responded to the latest FIFA crisis as it related to Qatar by saying that it was “not fair” and based on Western Islamophobia and racism towards Arabs. No doubt, debate about the Qatari World Cup has been burdened by sour grapes, envy, ulterior motives, prejudice and bigotry.
That, however, does not distract from real issues Qatar needs to confront and the multiple threats it faces. Those threats have been magnified as much by external factors as by Qatar’s own handling of affairs.
To be sure, Qatar, unlike other Gulf states, has since winning the World Cup engaged with its crit­ics. It has granted human rights and trade union activists access and worked with them to develop standards for working and living conditions for migrant workers. Qatar also cooperated in drafting proposals for a significant updating of the kafala sponsorship system that puts employees at the mercy of their employers.
Nonetheless, Qatar failed to capitalise on credibility it built with its failure to demonstrate sincerity by translating words into deeds. It further squandered credibility in a series of inelegantly handled incidents, including the repeated detention of foreign journalists. Making things worse, Qatar has recently tightened the screws on its critics.
All of that, coupled with the FIFA crisis, means that Qatar’s reputa­tion even before the dramatic announcement of legal proceedings was tarnished by repeated allega­tions of vote buying and the labour issue.
As a result, for a country that has proved to be a shrewd financial investor, Qatar’s return on invest­ment in soft-power instruments, such as the World Cup, designed to position it as a progressive ally of world powers in the hope that they will come to the aid of the wealthy Gulf state in times of emergency, has proven to be abysmal.
Instead of having amassed soft power, Qatar confronts multiple threats to its World Cup hosting rights. Those threats have raised the spectre of Qatar ultimately be­ing deprived of its hosting rights.
Yet, even though millions of documents obtained by the Sunday Times suggest that Qatar bought the World Cup, it ultimately is not the core issue. Even if it did, Qatar, like Russia, played the game the way it is played in FIFA. England lost its 2018 World Cup bid for the simple reason that it insisted on largely walking a straight and ethi­cally and legally correct line.
Hamad’s dismissal of the allega­tions as racist may ring hollow in failing to confront the substance of the allegations but it does forebode the geopolitical fallout and regional outcry were Qatar to lose its World Cup hosting rights.
Moreover, a Qatar under fire by legal authorities against the back­drop of a failed soft-power policy could either stiffen its back, decide to walk away from the tournament or be more inclined to attempt to repair suffered damage.
Qatar’s engagement with its crit­ics and promulgation of standards that comply with international labour norms hold out the prom­ise, despite Qatar’s failure so far to act on its lofty pledges, of the Gulf state’s tournament being one of the few World Cups to leave a legacy of change. That is far more important than seeking retribution for wrong­doing in an environment in which wrongdoing was the norm.

 James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, co-director of the Institute of Fan Culture of the University of Würzburg and the author of the blog The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer and a forthcoming book with the same title.


  1. James, as you know I love your work, but find the conclusion of this piece hard to swallow (and that's not British sour grapes, I promise!). I'm really not sure that the World Cup's potential to leave a 'legacy of change' matters all that much, leaving aside the question as to how paper-thin or non-existent such a legacy might turn out to be. As important is the actual staging of the event itself and the reality is that a World Cup staged in a city state will be a diminution of the very fabric of the tournament, where travel across a country and football heritage play a big part in the feel of the event. I'd love to see a World Cup in the MENA region, but not in a place whose sole merit is that they threw lots of money at the process. A World Cup in Turkey would be really something, Egypt too (if the politics could be sorted), even Morocco, but Qatar, not so much.

  2. William, thanks for the conflict. The jury is out but change of if not abolution of the kafala or sponsorship system would constitute a major change and ultimately have a ripple effect in the Gulf. Moreover, we don't discriminate against individuals because of whatever attributes in size or whatever they may have, why would one make an axception to that rule for countries. If one wishes to credit Blatter with having expanded the geography of the game than one has to also accept the consequences on the basis of equality.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan caught in the middle as China’s OBOR becomes Saudi-Iranian-Indian battleground

Israeli & Palestinian war crimes? Yes. Genocide? Maybe. A talk with Omer Bartov

Saudi religious diplomacy targets Jerusalem