Netanyahu puts Trump in a bind
By James M. Dorsey
Thank
you for joining me today.
The rise of Artificial Intelligence
magnifies the importance of journalists with true expertise, top-notch
sourcing, and historical depth. These journalists, like me, tell and analyse
in-depth stories. Their goal is to enhance their readers and listeners’ ability
to form informed opinions of their own.
We don’t just chronicle events. Our
reporting and analysis are shaped by years of on-the-ground coverage,
expertise, and historical knowledge. In my case, I have covered geopolitics,
the Middle East, and the Muslim world for decades, having been based in
multiple countries, including Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, the UAE,
Lebanon, Kuwait, and Turkey.
Hard-hitting reporting and analysis that
lets the chips fall where they may is even more critical in a world of brutal
wars, unimaginable humanitarian crises, and increasing authoritarianism.
That is The Turbulent World with James
M. Dorsey’s mission since its inception 15 years ago.
Thousands worldwide are avid readers and
listeners of The Turbulent World. Join them in helping to maintain and expand
the column and podcast by becoming a paid supporter by clicking here.
Subscribing allows you to participate in
a poll, listen to the podcast, watch the video, access the archive, post
comments, and direct message me with your questions.
Israel is playing a high-stakes game of bluff poker.
The problem is that the stakes are high not only for
Israel but also for its foremost supporters, the United States and Europe, as
well as Gulf states with which it enjoyed close relations despite differences
over Gaza, Palestine, and Iran.
How the US, Europe, and the Gulf respond to Israel's targeting
of Hamas's leadership in exile in Qatar, one of three mediators alongside the
United States and Egypt in the Gaza war, is likely to determine whether
Israel's gamble pays off.
The fact that Israel failed to kill any of the senior Hamas
leaders gathered to discuss an Israeli-endorsed US proposal to end the war and
initial responses to the attack don't bode well for Israel.
The international community has roundly
condemned the attack, even if US President Donald Trump stopped
short of condemnation but publicly castigated Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin
Netanyahu.
Israel will likely take heart from the fact that Mr.
Trump took Mr. Netanyahu to task in off-the-cuff remarks and a posting on his
social media platform, Truth
Social, but failed to follow through on a promise to issue a "full
statement."
Mr. Trump's failure to issue the statement appears to
have only emboldened Mr. Netanyahu.
While the
prime minister warned Qatar and others barely 24 hours after the
attack that if they failed to expel Hamas leaders or bring them to justice,
Israel would, Israel's ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter,
dismissed the international community's condemnation.
Messrs. Trump and Leiter’s statements ignored Mr. Trump’s
promise, immediately after the Israeli strike, that Israel would not attack
Qatar a second time.
“Right now, we may be subject to a little bit of
criticism. They’ll
get over it,' Mr. Leiter said.
In Mr. Netanyahu’s mind, the attack was the likely the
next logical step in his long-standing effort to discredit Qatar as a mediator,
accusing it of playing a double game by funding Hamas’s presence in Qatar while
projecting itself as a neutral go-between.
In doing so, Mr. Netanyahu conveniently neglected that Israel
had acquiesced in a 2012 US request that Qatar allow Hamas
to open an office in Doha to facilitate a backchannel and that he had asked the
Gulf state to fund the Hamas administration in Gaza to keep Gazan and West Bank
Palestinians divided.
Even so, Israel dismisses international criticism of the
attack at its peril.
Mr. Netanyahu's warning was as much directed at Turkey,
Iran, and Lebanon as it was at Qatar.
Unlike Qatar and Lebanon, which are unable to take on
Israel militarily, Turkey and Iran are likely to strike back if Israel were to
hit targets in Istanbul, Ankara, or Tehran.
More immediately, Israel’s attack on Qatar threatens to
force at least some of its staunchest allies to move beyond words and act.
Qatar is Europe’s second-largest gas supplier after the
United States, accounting for 14
per cent of European gas supplies.
In response to Israel’s conduct of the Gaza war, European
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, one of Europe’s staunchest supporters
of Israel, this week announced plans to seek sanctions
and a partial suspension of trade with Israel.
Ms. Von der Leyen didn’t mention Qatar in her
announcement, but there is little doubt that the Israeli attack is part of what
pushed her across the line.
The EU’s 27 member states have so far been divided over
sanctions against Israel. It was unclear whether the attack on Qatar may sway
holdouts such as Germany and Hungary.
In the meantime, Ms. Von der Leyen stated that she would
freeze support to Israel provided by the EU's executive branch, amounting to
approximately 32 million euros (US$37.5 million), which would not require the
approval of all member countries.
Europe, rather than the United States, is Israel’s
largest trading partner, as well as the foremost destination
for Israeli investments, according to the Amsterdam-based Centre for Research
on Multinational Corporations (SOMO).
The Center reported that the EU held €72.1 billion in
investments in Israel in 2023, compared to the United States’ €39.2 billion.
Similarly, Israel invested €65.9 billion in the EU, seven times more than the
€8.8 billion invested in the United States.
In 2024, European trade with Israel totalled €42.6
billion, significantly more than the €31.6 billion with the United States in
the same year.
In addition, Europe accounts for approximately 30 per
cent of Israel’s arms acquisitions. It is Israel’s
second-largest supplier after the United States.
Unlike Ms. Von der Leyen, Mr. Trump has been tiptoeing
through a minefield in his response to the Israeli attack. For him, the stakes
are geopolitical, economic, and personal.
With Qatar hosting the largest US military base in the
Middle East, Mr. Trump was at pains to stress that neither he nor the United
States was involved in the attack or had more than a few minutes of advance
knowledge.
Mr. Trump stressed the United States’s friendship with
Qatar, a
Major Non-NATO Ally, and key partner in attempts to negotiate a
ceasefire, if not an end to the Gaza war.
The president, much like when he failed
in his first term in office to rush to Saudi Arabia’s aid when
Iranian-backed Yemeni Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for attacks on the
kingdom’s oil facilities in 2019, will need to demonstrate the United States’s
reliability as a security partner.
Doing so could put the United States at odds with Israel.
Together with Gaza and Israeli strikes against Iran and
the Syrian military, Israel’s attack on Gaza has cemented Gulf perceptions of
Israel as a rogue player that is destabilising the Middle East.
Mr. Trump could restore a degree of confidence in the
United States by more assertively pushing Mr. Netanyahu to end the Gaza war and
move towards post-war security and governance arrangements in Gaza.
The problem with that is that Gulf states, like many
others in the international community, have said they would have no part of
Messrs. Trump and Netanyahu’s vision of a depopulated post-war Gaza.
In addition to geopolitical concerns, Mr. Trump will want
to ensure that
pledges of US$3.6 trillion in Qatari, Saudi, and Emirati investment in
the United States are not at risk as a result of the Israeli attack on Qatar.
The same goes for The Trump Organization. Led by the
president’s two oldest sons, the organisation is expanding in the Middle East
with new
ventures in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and
Oman.
Beyond expressing a degree of anger, Mr. Trump has not indicated
whether, in his mind, Mr. Netanyahu has crossed a line with Israel’s attack on
Gaza.
With the United Nations Security Council scheduled to
hold an emergency session on Thursday and an emergency Arab and Islamic summit
in Doha in the coming days, Mr. Trump doesn’t have much time to decide whether
he will call Israel’s bluff.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at
Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International
Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and podcast, The
Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.

Comments
Post a Comment