How much longer can FIFA ignore Gaza?
By James M. Dorsey
Welcome
to The Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey, a media initiative focused on the
Middle East and the Muslim World that seeks to empower readers, listeners, and
viewers to form informed opinions of their own.
Equitable,
fair, and honest analysis that lets the chips fall where they fall has seldom
been more important in a world wracked by brutal wars, unimaginable
humanitarian crises, and increasing authoritarianism.
If you
share this vision, please click here.
Paid
subscribers of The Turbulent World gain access to the column’s extensive
archive, exclusive posts, and polling. They can leave comments, join debates, and
know they are supporting independent writing, reporting, and analysis.
The Turbulent World can only sustain and expand its independent coverage
free of advertisements and clickbait with the support of its readers.
To participate in the poll, listen to the podcast, or watch the video,
please click here.
European members
of the world soccer body FIFA staged a dramatic walkout at the world
governing body’s congress in Paraguay when President Gianni Infantino arrived
late earlier this month.
The Europeans accused Mr. Infantino of prioritising his personal political interests by attributing greater importance to meetings with US President Donald J. Trump in Qatar, the host of the 2022 World Cup, than to FIFA’s highest decision-making body.
Mr. Infantino was part
of Mr. Trump's extended entourage on the president's three-nation Gulf tour,
which also included visits to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
With their walkout, the
Europeans highlighted a core problem with global sports governance that has
dogged FIFA, the International Olympic Committee, and virtually all other
global, regional, and national sports associations for decades: the insistence
on the fiction that sports and politics are separate.
The walkout had a pot
calling the kettle black quality to it, with the European soccer administrators
failing to acknowledge that they are as guilty of upholding the fiction as is
Mr. Infantino.
Sports administrators
have long refused to recognise that sports and politics are Siamese twins
joined at the hip, in desperate need of a regulatory mechanism to oversee the
relationship, much like a financial regulator supervises the financial sector.
The fiction has allowed
Mr. Infantino and his FIFA predecessors to violate the soccer body’s rules,
particularly regarding the human rights
obligations of tournament hosts.
The fiction has further
enabled FIFA to act as a pillar of autocracy, for example, by
awarding Saudi Arabia the 2034 World Cup hosting rights.
Over the last 15 years,
Gulf autocracies have been at the centre of FIFA's financial and political corruption scandals.
At least seven of the
FIFA Council’s 37 members are members or close associates of authoritarian or
autocratic leaders.
They include Bahrain
ruling family member Salman Bin Ebrahim, Sándor Csanyi, a close associate of Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orban, Hani Abo Rida, a close associate of Egyptian-general-turned-president
Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Fouzi Lekjaa, a senior Moroccan government budget official, Qatar ruling
family member Hamad Khalifa Al-Thani, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
associate Yasser Almisehal, and, Nigerien military officer Hamidou Djibrilla, a
onetime military junta spokesman.
Mr. Infantino joined
Mr. Trump on the Saudi and Qatari leg of the president’s Gulf tour. He flew to
Paraguay on a private Qatari jet.
Mr. Infantino justified
his prioritisation of the Trump road show by noting that the United States,
along with Canada and Mexico, will host the 2026 World Cup.
In doing so, Mr.
Infantino did what FIFA does best: serving as a pillar of autocracy and
authoritarianism.
Washington Post White
House Bureau chief Matt Viser, who covered Mr. Trump’s tour, noted that Messrs.
Trump and Infantino, beyond genuine affection for one another, have much in common.
“There is an aspect of
Trump’s foreign policy approach that aligns with FIFA’s president. They want to
expand global reach with glitz and glamour, and they are willing to stretch
ethical boundaries and turn a blind eye to autocrats who crack down on their
populations,” Mr. Viser said.
Messrs. Infantino and
Trump have known each other for years. Speaking at the 2020 World Economic
Forum in Davos, Mr. Infantino spoke glowingly about the US
president.
“President Trump is
definitely a sportsman. I am lucky enough in my life to come across some of the
most talented athletes in soccer. And President Trump is made of the same sort
of fibre. He is a competitor. He wants to compete. He wants to win. He wants to
show who is the best. He says actually what many think, but more importantly,
he does, then, what he says.” Mr. Infantino said.
That may be one reason why Mr. Infantino has steered clear of the Gaza war for the past 19 months.
Mr. Infantino,
supported by many European federations, ensured that FIFA remained silent about
Gaza even though Israel’s assault killed a large number of Palestinian
footballers and destroyed the Strip’s sporting infrastructure.
Mr. Infantino bought
time by insisting for the last year that he was seeking legal advice on a call by the Palestinian Football
Federation to sanction Israeli soccer because of the Gaza war.
Mr. Infantino’s refusal
to act contrasted starkly with FIFA’s decision to bar Russia from competing in
the 2022 World Cup months after Russian troops invaded Ukraine.
However, with Europe
and Canada this week threatening to sanction Israel because it blocked the
entry of humanitarian goods into Gaza, FIFA may no longer be able to sit on the
fence.
The hardening European
attitude towards Israel may narrow the gap between European governments and
significant segments of public opinion critical of Israel, as well as between
FIFA and soccer fans, a key pillar of the soccer community.
The gap is evident in
soccer with soccer fan protests in Europe and North Africa.
Glasgow’s
Celtic FC supporters launched a campaign for FIFA to “show Israel the red
card.” Fans in countries as far-flung as Spain, Ireland, and Morocco have
followed suit.
Tottenham
Hotspur fans demanded that one of their star players, Israel-born Manor
Solomon, one of Israel’s top sporting exports, be sent to the International
Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague because he supported the Israeli assault on
Gaza.
*He looks
good; He looks fine; Manor Solomon's on my mind; And he hates Palestine!” fans chanted.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an
Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam
School of International Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and
podcast, The Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.

Comments
Post a Comment