Middle Eastern juxtapositions: The phone call that never came
By James M.
Dorsey
A podcast
version of this story is available on
Soundcloud, Itunes,
Spotify,
Stitcher,
TuneIn,
Spreaker,
Pocket Casts, Tumblr,
Podbean, Audecibel, Patreon and Castbox.
Populated by
fluent Hebrew speakers, the Israel desk of Armenia’s foreign ministry waited back
in 1991 in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union for a phone call that
never came.
The ministry
was convinced that Israel, with whom Armenia shared an experience of genocide,
were natural allies.
The ministry
waited in vain. Israel never made the call.
The shared
experience could not compete with Armenia’s Turkic nemesis, Azerbaijan, with
which it was at war over Nagorno Karabagh, an Armenian enclave on Azerbaijani
territory.
“The
calculation was simple. Azerbaijan has three strategic assets that Israel is
interested in: Muslims, oil and several thousand Jews. All Armenia has to offer
is at best several hundred Jews,” said an Israeli official at the time.
Azerbaijan
had one more asset: close ties to Turkey, which supported it in the war against
Armenia.
As a result,
Israel and Jewish organizations with long-standing ties to Turkey refrained for
years from participating in annual commemorations of the 1915 mass murder of
Armenians.
In a sign of
the times, that may be changing.
Turkish
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s strained relations with Israel and the West,
his touting of implicitly anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, hollowing out of
Turkish democracy and offensive against Syrian Kurds who played a key role in
defeating the Islamic State, appears to have turned the tide.
The US
Congress as well as major American Jewish organizations have laid Turkish
objections by the wayside and recognized the mass murder of Armenian as
genocide.
“One thing
is certain: Armenians and Jews, two groups whose similar history makes them
natural allies, will improve their relationships,” said historian
and political scientist Marc David Baer.
Mr. Baer may
have spoken too early.
While
relations with Turkey may no longer be a consideration, relations with
Azerbaijan are.
To be sure,
Azerbaijan’s human rights record is hardly better than that of Turkey.
Yet, predominantly
Shiite Azerbaijan, like Armenia, borders on Iran.
With tension
between the United States and Iran on the rise, that could be of significance.
President
Donald J. Trump tweeted earlier this week that he had ordered the US Navy to
destroy any vessels in the Gulf that harassed American navy ships.
Mr. Trump
posted his tweet after Iranian Revolutionary Guard gun speedboats had made,
according to the US, “dangerous and harassing approaches.”
The
approaches were part of Iran’s strategy of gradual escalation that aims to
bring the United States and the Islamic republic to the brink of war in a bid
to force a return to the 2015 international agreement that curbed Iran’s
nuclear program.
The Trump
administration withdrew from the agreement in 2018 and re-imposed harsh
economic sanctions on Iran.
The
International Crisis Group, in an effort to pre-empt the tit-for-tat from
escalating out of control, called this week for a US-Iranian
military hotline. “A mechanism facilitated by a third party might contain
the risk of conflict due to misread signals and miscalculation,” the group
said.
Lurking in
the background as the United States and Israel focus on getting a grip on the
coronavirus and the pandemic’s economic fallout is the fact that Iran’s gradual
breaching of the nuclear accord has put the Islamic republic within reach of
the amount of enriched uranium needed to produce a nuclear weapon.
The breaches
were part of Iran’s so far failed attempt to pressure the United States as well
as an effort to force other signatories to compensate it for losses suffered by
the US sanctions.
Iran has
consistently denied that it aims to obtain a nuclear capability. It has
breached the nuclear deal without abrogating the agreement that was also signed
by China, France, Russia, Britain, Germany and the European Union.
The
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned last month that Iran had nearly
tripled its stockpile of enriched uranium and was refusing to answer questions
about three possible undeclared nuclear sites.
Concern
about Iran’s military capability was boosted this week with the Islamic
republic’s successful launch of a satellite and unveiling of a full-blown
space program managed by the Revolutionary Guards.
Add to that
a just published study
of the Iranian navy thar concludes “based on its doctrine of naval warfare,
the Iranian revolutionary naval forces have embarked on a fast-paced rearmament
and reequipment program during the past two decades, aimed at offsetting the
U.S. Navy’s military presence in the Persian Gulf region.”
All of
which, demonstrates the failure of the United States’ maximum pressure campaign
against Iran and the country’s abilities despite sanctions and a pandemic.
Israel made clear
in the years prior to the signing of the nuclear accord that it would not allow
Iran to get within a year of being able to build a nuclear weapon.
At the time,
Israel and Azerbaijan discussed the possibility of the Israeli air force using
Azerbaijani airbases should it opt to take out the Islamic republic’s
nuclear facilities.
Talk of an
Israeli strike has not yet been revived amidst the current escalating
US-Iranian tension, but that does not mean it will not.
For Armenia’s
Israel experts, this means that there is no point in once again waiting for an
Israeli phone call. That call is not coming any time soon.
Dr. James
M. Dorsey is an award-winning journalist and a senior fellow at Nanyang
Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in
Singapore. He is also an adjunct senior research fellow at the National
University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute and co-director of the
University of Wuerzburg’s Institute of Fan Culture in Germany
Comments
Post a Comment