Clerics and entertainment seek to bolster MbS’s grip on power
By James M.
Dorsey
A podcast
version of this story is available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, Spreaker, Pocket Casts, Tumblr, and Patreon, Podbean
and Castbox.
A public apology by a prominent Salafi scholar sheds a light on Saudi crown
prince Mohammed bin Salman’s version of ‘moderate Islam,’ his effort to shape
the Middle East and North Africa in his mould, and the replacement of religion
with hyper-nationalism as the source of his legitimacy.
Claiming to
speak in the name of the Sahwa or Awakening movement, Aidh al-Qarni, one of the
kingdom’s most popular religious scholars, broke with the Muslim
Brotherhood-linked group’s past call for political reform and instead
wholeheartedly endorsed Prince Mohammed’s undefined notion of an Islam that
would be free of extremism.
“I would
like to apologize to Saudi society for…the extremism, the violation of the
Qur’an and the Sunnah, the violation of the tolerance of Islam, the violation
of the moderate and merciful nature of Islam. I support today the moderate and
open-to-the-world Islam that has been called for by crown prince Mohammed bin
Salman,” Mr. Al-Qarni said, wearing a Salafi-style chequered red and white
headdress.
More than
simply a declaration of support for the Saudi leader, Mr. Al-Qarni’s apology
provided ideological justification for Prince Mohammed’s so far only partially successful
efforts to ensure that regional states are ruled by governments of his liking,
refusal to condemn assaults on Islam like in China’s north-western province of
Islam, and crackdown at home that potentially has put some of his past
colleagues on death row.
Mr. Al-Qarni
was not among Islamic scholars that have been detained, many of them in a
crackdown in September 2017. Those
arrested and potentially facing execution included some of the kingdom’s other most
popular reformist preachers such as Salman al-Audah and Mr. Al-Qarni’s
namesake, Awad al-Qarni.
Charges against the two men, as well as author and broadcaster
Ali al-Omari, include stirring public discord, inciting people against the
ruler, public support for imprisoned dissidents and alleged ties to the
Brotherhood and Qatar. A Saudi-United Arab Emirates-led alliance has been
boycotting Qatar economically and diplomatically for the past two years.
Mr. Al-Omari,
a former United Nations Goodwill Ambassador for Youth and Humanity, is a member
of the Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars founded by
controversial scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Mr. Al-Qaradawi is widely believed to
be a major spiritual influence within the Brotherhood.
Mr.
Al-Qarni’s endorsement of Prince Mohammed and reports that two of his
colleagues may be executed came as Human Rights Watch rang alarm bells about the fate of Murtaja
Qureiris, an 18-year old who could face a similar fate.
Mr. Qureiris was arrested when he was
13 for participating
in 2011 in a bike protest in eastern Saudi Arabia three years earlier when he
was 10 years old.
Mr. Qureiris
was charged with belonging to a terrorist group, helping to construct Molotov
cocktails, shooting at security forces and participating in a protest at the
funeral of his brother, who was killed in an allegedly violent demonstration.
Mr. Al-Qarni
didn’t do his former colleagues any favours by asserting that Qatar was funding
Saudi scholars. “Of course, people get money… Saudis went there (Qatar),” Mr.
Al-Qarni said, refusing to identify who he was referring to.
‘Qatar Papers,’ a recently published book in France,
purportedly based on hitherto unpublished documents, asserted that the Gulf
state was funding numerous mosques and individuals in Europe associated with
the Brotherhood.
A TV series
broadcast during this year’s Ramadan, when programs get their highest ratings, provided
background music for Mr. Al-Qarni’s
apology.
Rewriting
history through the eyes of a Saudi family, Al-Asouf (Winds of Change) blames the
Sahwa for some of the region’s most momentous events, including the 1979
Iranian revolution, the occupation by militants of the Grand Mosque in Mecca that
same year, and the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat because
of his signing of a peace treaty with Israel.
In line with
Prince Mohammed’s assertion that Saudi Arabia embraced a more moderate form of
Islam prior to the events of 1979, Al-Asouf suggests that Sahwa’s ultra-conservatism bolstered by
its hostility towards the West, misogynist attitudes towards women and
intolerance, influenced a generation of Saudis.
Adding to
Mr. Al-Qarni’s apology and Al-Asouf’s messaging, Adil al-Kalbani, a former imam
of the Grand Mosque and often straight-talking member of the kingdom’s
ultra-conservative religious establishment, who has seven million followers on
Twitter, made a 180 degrees U-turn on his past statements that supported severe
restrictions of women’s rights and denounced Shiites as apostates.
Challenging
one of the kingdom’s major taboos, Mr. Al-Kalbani denounced gender segregation
in mosques as “a
kind of phobia," arguing that in the era of the Prophet Mohammad, men and
women prayed together.
“Now
unfortunately we’ve become paranoid to the level that in a mosque, a place of
worship, it’s as if women are in a fortress,” he said. “They’re completely
isolated from the men, not seeing or hearing them except through microphones or
speakers.”
Drawing red
lines, Mr. Al-Qarni sought to provide religious justification to Prince
Mohammed’s policies. The crown prince’s concept of moderate Islam, involving
absolute obedience to the ruler, was one red line. The interests of Saudi
Arabia as defined by Prince Mohammed was another.
“I went and
pledged allegiance to the King and swore on the Qur’an and the Sunnah. I went
on the night of the 27th (of May) to Mecca and pledged allegiance to
Mohammed bin Salman. You pledge allegiance for better or for worse… I declare
here that I am now one of the swords of the state,” Mr. Al-Qarni said.
Asserting that
Saudi Arabia was being targeted by Iran, Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan
and the Muslim Brotherhood, Mr. Al -Qarni’s definition of the kingdom as a red
line appeared to break with Sahwa and the Saudi past religious embrace of
Islam’s concept of the ummah, the global community of the faithful.
In the words
of Saudi Arabia scholar Raihan Ismail, Mr. Al-Qarni was rejecting the notion of
the ummah because it “undermines the primacy of the
nation-state.”
In doing so,
Mr. Al-Qarni was attempting to provide religious cover for Prince Mohammed’s
apparent endorsement during a visit to Beijing
earlier this year of China’s crackdown on Turkic Muslims and his apparent support for a US plan to resolve the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict that is widely believed to favour Israel and deny
Palestinian aspirations.
Anwar
Gargash, the minister of state for foreign affairs of Saud Arabia’s closest
ally, the United Arab Emirates, hailed Mr. Al-Qarni’s apology as an important step “as we close
the door to the stage of extremism and the employment of religion for political
purposes.”
Mr.
Gargash’s comments put a finger on differences in the approaches towards Islam of
Emirati crown prince Mohammed bin Zayed and his Saudi counterpart.
Viscerally
opposed to political Islam, UAE Prince Mohamed rather than the Saudi crown
prince has been the driver in support by the two Gulf states of anti-Islamist
forces across the Middle
East and North Africa.
In fact, Prince
Mohammed’s notion of moderate Islam, although projected as a break with Saudi
Arabia’s past propagation of ultra-conservative strands of Islam that critics
charged contributed to breeding grounds of violence, amounts to a form of
conservative political Islam that is designed to bolster his autocratic regime
rather than reform the faith.
Similarly
dissident Saudi scholar Madawi al-Rasheed asserted that the kingdom’s decision
to recently convene three Gulf, Arab and Islamic summits during Ramadan in the
holy city of Mecca was “nothing but utter Islamism.”
Ms.
Al-Rasheed argued that the summits exposed “the contradiction in the recent
Saudi push to ban and criminalise Islamism. The three conferences are not being
held to discuss theological matters, but to seek support for Saudi Arabia's
king over serious, controversial and divisive political crises,” she said.
Dr. James
M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S.
Rajaratnam School of International Studies, an adjunct senior research fellow
at the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute and co-director
of the University of Wuerzburg’s Institute of Fan Culture.
Comments
Post a Comment