Global watchdog takes Saudi Arabia to task for lax anti-terrorism finance measures
By James M. Dorsey
A podcast version of this story is available at https://soundcloud.com/user-153425019/global-watchdog-takes-saudi-arabia-to-task-for-lax-anti-terrorism-finance-measures
A Financial
Action Task Force (FATF) report criticizing Saudi Arabia’s anti-money
laundering and terrorism finance measures puts the kingdom on the
spot 17 years after the 9/11 attacks and casts a shadow over its diplomatic and
economic boycott of Qatar on the grounds that the Gulf state supports
militants.
In a nod to the kingdom, the international watchdog
described as “understandable” the fact the kingdom’s “almost exclusive focus of
authorities on domestic (terrorist financing) offences means the authorities
are not prioritizing disruption of support for threats outside the kingdom.”
The 246-page report contrasted starkly with US President
Donald J. Trump’s assessment expressed in his address to the United Nations
general assembly. “Following my trip to Saudi Arabia last year, the Gulf
countries opened a new centre to target terrorist financing. They
are enforcing new sanctions. They are working with us to identify and track
terrorist networks and taking more responsibility for fighting terrorism
and extremism in their own region, Mr. Trump said.
Mr. Trump, by design or default, did not take into account the
flow of substantial
amounts of Saudi money to militants in the Pakistani province of Balochistan
that borders on Iran. Mounting indications suggest that the Islamic republic’s
detractors may be moving to stir unrest among Iran’s ethnic minorities in a bid
to change the regime in Tehran.
The flow of funds leaves open the possibility that the
kingdom’s laxity in cracking down on funds flowing to extremists beyond its
frontiers may be deliberate.
To be sure, Saudi Arabia has been strengthening its
anti-money laundering and terrorism finance regime ever since the 9/11 attacks
on New York and Washington in which the perpetrators were primarily Saudi
nationals and Al Qaeda attacks in the kingdom itself in 2003 and 2004.
Writing in Forbes, journalist Dominic Dudley noted that the FATF
report may not have taken into account new anti-money laundering and terrorism
finance-related laws adopted last year by Saudi Arabia. “The new
laws were coming in just as the FATF was conducting its research for this
report and it is too soon to judge how effective they have been,” Mr. Dudley
said.
Even so, it was only with the ascendancy to the throne of
King Salman in 2015 and the rise of his son, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman,
that the kingdom began to review its more
than four decades long global funding of intolerant, anti-pluralistic,
supremacist, ant-Shiite and anti-Iranian ultra-conservative Sunni Muslim groups
and institutions.
While financing has been severely curtailed and funding vehicles like the
Muslim World League have been refashioned to propagate moderation and
inter-faith dialogue, the kingdom, as in the case of Balochistan,
continues to support ultra-conservatives where it serves its geopolitical
goals.
In what apparently reflected frustration with the kingdom’s
progress in countering money laundering and terrorism, FATF did not mince its
words in its report. “Saudi Arabia is not effectively investigating and prosecuting
individuals involved in larger scale or professional (money laundering] activity”
and is “not effectively confiscating the proceeds of crime,” the report said.
FATF suggested that the problem was the kingdom’s
implementation of anti-money laundering and terrorism finance measures rather
than its legal infrastructure. “Saudi
Arabia has a legal framework that provides it with an adequate basis to
investigate and prosecute ML (money laundering) activities… Saudi Arabia is not
effectively investigating and prosecuting individuals involved in larger scale
or professional ML activity. Investigations are often reactive rather than
proactive, and tend to be straightforward and single layered.,” the report
said.
The report’s wording left the possibility open that poor
implementation was the result of either a lack of political will or the fact
that there is widespread criticism of Prince Mohammed’s reforms within the
bureaucracy and the kingdom’s religious establishment despite a crackdown on
any form of dissent.
That possibility gains currency given the fact that FATF
acknowledges that “Saudi Arabia has demonstrated an ability to respond to the
dynamic terrorism threat it faces in country. Saudi Arabian authorities have
demonstrated that they have the training, experience and willingness to pursue
TF (terrorism finance) investigations in conjunction with and alongside
terrorism cases.”
The report noted that Saudi Arabia seldom convicted funders
of political violence who were not directly involved in attacks. “This includes TF cases in relation to funds
raised in the Saudi Arabia for support of individuals affiliated with terrorist
entities outside the kingdom, particularly outside the Middle-East region,
which remains a risk. Saudi Arabia’s overall strategy for fighting terrorist
financing mainly focuses on using law enforcement measures to disrupt terrorist
threats directed at the kingdom and its immediate vicinity,” the report said.
FATF’s criticism is embarrassing for a country that ever
since the 9/11 attacks has been attempting to shed its image of having fuelled
militancy, position itself as a leader in the struggle against militancy and
extremism, and project itself as a 21st century knowledge hub by
liberalizing its strict social and cultural norms, including the recent lifting
of the ban on women’s driving.
It is also awkward because the report puts Saudi Arabia in
the position of the pot calling the kettle black when it comes to the
15-month-old Saudi-United Arab Emirates-led boycott of Qatar because it
allegedly funds and supports militancy. Saudi Arabia’s failure to garner
widespread international support for its boycott or force Qatar to concede
heightens the awkwardness.
That is even more the case given that Saudi Arabia together
with the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt is demanding among other things that Qatar “consent
to monthly compliance audits in the first year after agreeing to the demands,
followed by quarterly audits in the second year, and annual audits in the
following 10 years” – something the kingdom would be unlikely to
accept if hypothetically asked in the wake of the FATF report to submit to a similar
regime.
Dr.
James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International
Studies, co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture,
and co-host of the New Books in Middle Eastern Studies podcast.
James is the author of The Turbulent World
of Middle East Soccer blog, a book with the same title and a co-authored
volume, Comparative Political Transitions between Southeast Asia and
the Middle East and North Africa as well as Shifting
Sands, Essays on Sports and Politics in the Middle East and North Africa
and just published China
and the Middle East: Venturing into the Maelstrom
Comments
Post a Comment