Egyptian President Al-Sisi steps up repression to cover policy failure
By James M. Dorsey
Egyptian general-turned-president Abdul Fattah Al-Sisi would
likely be the first to admit that an iron fist is no guarantee for retaining
power. Not because of the fate of the country’s longest ruling autocrat, Hosni
Mubarak, who was toppled in 2011 by a popular revolt. But because Mr. Al-Sisi’s
iron fist has not squashed resistance, nor has it enabled him to properly deliver
badly needed public goods and services.
Mr. Al-Sisi has, however, not concluded in advance of
elections expected next year that he should perhaps loosen the reigns, reduce
the role of the military in the economy that is drowning out much of the
private sector, and opt for economic policies that are not centred on huge,
white elephant infrastructure projects but instead target job creation and
lifting millions out of poverty.
Instead, backed by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi
Arabia, Mr. Al-Sisi is tightening
his grip on youth groups and sports clubs that were at the core of the 2011
revolt. He is also believed to be attempting to ensure that credible
presidential candidates are prevented from running in the election for which he
has yet to declare himself a candidate.
Mr. Al-Sisi’s failed policies, insistence on repressive
state-centred control of public life, and electoral processes that are
everything but free and fair, raises questions about the sustainability of
UAE-Saudi-led counterrevolution that aimed to roll back the achievements of the
2011 popular Arab uprisings in which the leaders of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and
Yemen were overthrown. Mr. Al-Sisi came to office in 2013 in a UAE-Saudi backed
military coup that toppled the country’s first and only democratically elected
leader.
Egypt has proven resistant to the policy formula adopted by
the UAE and Saudi Arabia at home and advocated elsewhere in the region. The two
Gulf states have embraced economic reform and greater social freedom while
employing repression to retain ever tighter political control. Repression and
absolute political control appears to be the only aspect of the UAE-Saudi
formula that Egypt has wholeheartedly adopted.
Mr. Al-Sisi’s policies forced US president Donald J. Trump,
who has deemphasized human rights in his administration’s policy and is a fan
of the Egyptian leader, to cut off some military aid earlier this year in
compliance with US law.
The
Washington Post, commenting in an editorial on last month’s jihadist attack
on a Sufi mosque in the Sinai that killed more than 300 people, effectively
described Mr. Al-Sisi as part of the problem rather than part of the solution. “The
regime has used terrorism as a pretext for the most severe repression in Egypt’s
modern history,” the Post said.
Former Egyptian prime minister and senior air force
commander Ahmed
Shafiq, potentially Mr. Al-Sisi’s most serious challenger, charged this
week that the UAE had barred him from travelling to his home country. UAE
minister of state for foreign affairs Anwar Gargash denied the charge but
acknowledged that his country had “severe reservations about some of his (Mr.
Shafiq’s) positions.”
Mr. Shafiq moved to the UAE in 2012 after he was charged
with corruption and acquitted in the wake of his defeat in presidential
elections that were won by Muslim Brother Mohammed Morsi, whom Mr. Al-Sisi forced
out of office a year later.
Despite being financially dependent for support from the UAE
and Saudi Arabia, Mr. Al-Sisi has differed with them on policies towards Iran
and Syria, but joined the two states’ six-month-old diplomatic and economic
boycott of Qatar because of its support for the Muslim Brotherhood.
In a move that is likely to provoke ire in the United States,
Egypt and Russia this week agreed on a draft agreement that would allow the
Russian air force to operate from Egyptian bases. The agreement would permit the
UAE and Saudi Arabia to enhance arm’s length military cooperation with Russia,
particularly in Libya where they support controversial military commander Khalifa
Haftar.
Mr. Al-Sisi, following years of failed efforts to forge a
politically controlled dialogue with Egyptian youth, has launched a two-pronged
effort to control youth and sports organizations, potentially alongside Mr.
Shafiq, the greatest threat to his continued rule.
Militant soccer fans, who played a key role in toppling Mr.
Mubarak and student protests against Mr. Al-Sisi that were brutally repressed
in 2013 and 2014, rejected several overtures by the president and have in
recent months again witnessed the blunt side of his rule.
Hundreds of ultras -- battle-hardened, anti-authoritarian
fans opposed to the commercialization of soccer -- were
arrested in recent months for wearing jerseys with the number 74 on
them in commemoration of supporters of storied Cairo club Al Ahli killed in
2012 in a politically loaded soccer brawl in the Suez Canal city Port Said. The
incident, the worst in Egyptian sporting history, was widely seen as an effort
by security forces that got out of hand to teach fans a lesson.
Another 500 members of Ultras White Knights (UWK), the
militant support group of Al Ahli arch rival Al Zamalek SC, were arrested in
July as they tried to attend their team’s match against Libya’s Al Ahli
Tripoli. Many have since been released.
Egypt’s parliament last month approved in principle a new
law governing youth and sports organizations that although portrayed as a gift to Egyptian
youth bans clubs from engaging “in any political or partisan activity or
promoting any political or partisan activity” or even “promoting any ideas or
political objectives.”
Many Egyptian clubs, including Al Ahli and Zamalek were
founded in the early years of the 20th century as politically
motivated groups and have retained their aura despite having long moved on. Al
Ahli was established as an anti-monarchical, anti-colonial, and pro-republican
club while Zamalek identified itself as pro-monarchy and pro-British.
Parliament’s gift was in advance of a World Youth Forum in
the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, one of several such gatherings intended
to give Egyptian youth a sense of participation, however limited, by connecting
them to policymakers. While the law banned discussions where youth gather, the
forum was held under the motto of “we need to talk.”
Saudi Arabia signalled the significance it attributes to
control of sports clubs by having its ambassador in Cairo attend this week’s
election of soccer icon Mahmoud
Al-Khatib as Al Ahli’s president.
The absence of senior Egyptian government officials was
likely intended to avoid attracting intention to the fact that the government,
in violation of world soccer body FIFA rules, owns a majority of the country’s
premier league clubs, and to its increased political control of the sport. FIFA
has long looked the other way in countries like Egypt and Iran.
Mr. Al-Sisi’s tightening of the reins comes in advance of
Egypt’s participation for the first time in 28 years in World Cup finals in
Russia in 2018. Football success in the Middle East often equals heightened
emotions in a soccer-crazy part of the world and amounts to a double-edged
sword for autocrats.
Identification with successful teams offers autocrats an
opportunity to polish their tarnished images, certainly if success sparks
nationalist fervour. Yet, heightened soccer-driven emotion can also result in
anti-government protest, one reason Egyptian stadiums have largely been closed
to the public for the last six years. The new law governing youth and sports
organizations is unlikely to reduce the risk of stadiums again becoming
platforms of protest if, and when, the ban is lifted.
Dr.
James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International
Studies, co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture,
and co-host of the New Books in
Middle Eastern Studies podcast. James is the author of The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog, a book with the same title as well
as Comparative
Political Transitions between Southeast Asia and the Middle East and North
Africa,
co-authored with Dr. Teresita Cruz-Del Rosario and Shifting Sands, Essays on Sports and
Politics in the Middle East and North Africa.
Comments
Post a Comment