Kuwaiti rulers fight it out on the pitch
By James M. Dorsey
Disputes in Kuwait’s ruling Al Sabah family that sparked international
sports sanctions against the Gulf state went again on public display this week
with one branch of the family suing International Olympic Committee (IOC) and
FIFA executive committee member Sheikh Ahmad Al-Fahad Al-Sabah, one of world
sports most powerful men, and his brother Talal on charges that they were responsible
for Kuwait’s sports problems.
The court case threatens to further undermine a bid by
Sheikh Ahmed to engineer the election in February of his protégé, Bahraini
Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al Khalifa, as president of FIFA. Sheikh Ahmed was
already weakened by several humiliating defeats.
The IOC and FIFA official was forced last April to issue a
public apology to Kuwaiti emir Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, his uncle, and
other senior officials. A Kuwaiti court sentenced him in December to six months
in prison for violating a gag order.
The long-standing power struggle involving personal and
political differences between members of the family is widely believed to be
the result of Sheikh Ahmed’s ambition to leverage his powerful position in
sports to secure a prominent position in government.
Sheikh Ahmed, a former oil minister and head of Kuwait’s
national security council who is president of the Olympic Council of Asia and
the Association of National Olympic Committees, is further embroiled in a
bitter rivalry with Kuwait's information and state minister for youth affairs
Sheikh Salman Sabah Al-Salem Al-Homud Al-Sabah. Sheikh Salman failed in 2014 to
become president of the International Shooting Sport Federation after he was
accused of abusing his position in government to garner votes.
Sheikh Ahmed based his bid for government office on
accusations that former prime minister Sheikh Nasser Al-Mohammad Al-Ahmad
Al-Sabah, another relative, and former parliament speaker Jassem Mohammad
Abdul-Mohsen Al-Karafi had plotted to topple the government and launder money
and misuse public funds.
Sheikh Ahmed was last April forced to appear on television
to apologize after a court dismissed as fabrications digital documents and
video recordings that he had submitted as evidence for his allegations. The
television appearance was intended to humiliate Sheikh Ahmed and thwart his
ambitions in a country in which status and face are important.
“I offer my deep apologies and express my profound regrets
for my recent prejudice, abuse and slander, intentional and unintentional, and
which were based on the information and documents concerning the interests of
the country that I had received. I thought the information was correct and
credible.
But now that the competent judicial authorities affirmed they
were not valid or correct, stressing the truth is a virtue. As I seek pardon
from Your Highness, I stress that what happened will be a lesson from which I
will benefit and draw appropriate conclusions. I am in full compliance with the
orders and directives of Your Highness and I promise to turn the page on this
matter and not to raise it again,” Sheikh Ahmed said.
Sheikh Ahmed’s sentencing to prison was on the grounds that
he had violated a prosecutor’s gag order regarding his allegations against
senior members of his family and the government by discussing it in a
television interview.
Sheikh Ahmed has denied any wrongdoing and has vowed to
appeal the verdict. Insisting that the verdict was a “personal attack” that was
indicative of strained relations between the government and the sports
movement, Sheikh Ahmed insisted that he had the right to freely express his
opinion.
Sheikh Ahmed was referring to his increasingly strained
relations with his family as well as Kuwait’s suspension by the IOC, FIFA and
15 other international sports associations because of political interference in
sports. It was the second time in five years that Kuwait was banned by the IOC
from participating in Olympic Games.
Kuwait's Public Authority for Youth and Sports headed by Sheikh
Ahmad Mansour Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, another relative of Sheikh Ahmed, this week
opened a lawsuit charging the IOC and FIFA official and his brother who is
president of Kuwait’s national Olympic committee and soccer federation of being
responsible for the banning of the Gulf state.
The authority asserted that the banning occurred after
Sheikh Ahmed had complained to the IOC about government interference. Youth
minister Sheikh Salman accused Sheikh Ahmed without mentioning him by name of
being responsible for “the status of sport in Kuwait (that) was in total
decline” in the past five years and of “filing false complaints to
international organization in a bid to suspend the country's sport
activities,"
The IOC, in response to the allegations of political
interference, demanded that Kuwait alter legislation that gave the government
control of sports and undermined the independence of the country's Olympic
committee and sports associations. Kuwait refused to comply with a 27 October
2015 deadline set by the IOC.
The authority’s lawsuit initially seeks $16,500 in damages
from the two brothers and one other member of the ruling family. If the
authority wins the case it could pave the way for demands for $400 million in
damages or the equivalent of what the government says it spent on sports in the
past five years.
Kuwaiti officials said privately that members of the ruling
family were fighting a bitter battle against one another at the expense of
their country’s sports. “This is a political struggle. They want to finish off Sheikh
Ahmed but he is not someone who will go down without a fight,” one official
said.
James M.
Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies,
co-director of the University of Wuerzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, a
syndicated columnist, and the author of The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog and a forthcoming book with
the same title.
Comments
Post a Comment