Soccer: Jihadists seek to exploit widespread sense of abandonment
By James M. Dorsey
Stadia have re-emerged as a preferred jihadist target in the
wake of last weekend’s Islamic State (IS) bombing of the Stade de France
stadium, a shootout five days later with jihadist militants in a Paris suburb
adjacent to the stadium, a reportedly foiled plot against a stadium in the
German city of Hannover barely an hour before the German national team was
scheduled to play, the cancelation of a friendly between Belgium and Spain, and
France’s banning of fans from travelling to matches for the next three months.
The targeting of stadia spotlights jihadists’ often
convoluted relationship to soccer. Many jihadists see soccer as an infidel creation
designed to distract the faithful from fulfilling their religious obligations.
Yet, many of them are soccer fans or former, failed or disaffected players who
see the sport as an effective recruitment and bonding tool.
In a perverse way, France’s decision to ban fans from
travelling to their team’s away from home matches recognizes soccer’s utility
as a mobilizer. A successful attack on a soccer match would go a long way to
achieve IS’s goals of polarizing communities, exacerbating social tensions, and
driving the marginalized further into the margins.
French fears are grounded in a degree of alienation among
segments of youth with an immigrant background that has prompted them to refuse
to support the French national team in a manifestation of their sense that there
is no equal place for them in French society.
French fears were also rooted in a history of immigrant soccer
violence irrespective of whether the French team wins or not dating back to
France’s winning of the World Cup in 1998 with a team that brought together a
generation of players who all had their origins outside France and was widely
seen as a symbol of successful French integration of minorities.
Days earlier, police in France and four other European
countries had arrested 100 people of Algerian descent associated with the
Groupe Islamique Arme (GIA), a militant Islamist group fighting in Algeria’s
civil war in the 1990s that left at least 100,000 people dead.
Eleven years later, some 12,000 youths of Algerian descent
poured into Paris Champs Elysees for celebrations to celebrate Algeria’s defeat
of Egypt in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum rather than support France which
was preparing for a crucial World Cup qualifier against Ireland.
The celebrations degenerated into clashes with police
prompting a student to tell Andrew Hussey, a scholar who has charted French-North
African relations and the soccer politics of French communities of North
African origin: “"I can't believe it. I've never seen anything like it.
It's not just about football. It has to be about something else."
Mr. Hussey argued in The
Guardian that the riots were not simply about perceived racism in France
but harked back to French colonial rule that viewed Algeria as an integral part
of France but treated Algerians as second class citizens.
More recently, fans with a migrant background and police
clashed last year in Paris and Marseille after Algeria beat Russia to advance to
the 2014 World Cup finals in Brazil.
It is those kind of societal divisions that IS targeted with
its attack last Friday on the Stade de France and its alleged plots in Germany.
In doing so IS is seeking to exploit a perception of prejudice, discrimination
and abandonment that stretches far beyond France and is not restricted to
communities feel disenfranchised and hopeless.
Ironically, that may have failed with French and other
Muslims far more assertive in their condemnation of the Paris attacks than of
the assault in January on French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish
supermarket.
However, mixed with the abhorrence felt by French Muslims at
the carnage in Paris is a sense among many that Muslims are being stereotyped
and targeted whether at home or in countries far and near.
A French Muslim
office worker quotes his daughter as asking him after returning from school: “Why
am I to blame? What did I do? I’m French. Yet, I’m denounced as a terrorist
while they bomb Muslims in Syria and Iraq.”
A French taxi driver of Algerian descent quips: “Nothing
justified what happened. These people are beasts. But France and others can’t
go round the world bombing countries and leaving ordinary people to pick up the
pieces. It’s logical that there would be a reaction. This, however, was not the
way to do it.”
Turkish fans booed this week during a minute of silence in
honour of the Paris victims at the beginning of a match in Istanbul between
Turkey and Greece attended by the Turkish and Greek prime ministers and
intended to seal Turkish-Greek reconciliation. Boos and jeers were also heard
during a minute's silence in Dublin at a Euro 2016 play-off between Ireland and
Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The sense of an international community that measures with
different yardsticks is deeply felt across the globe, including by Syrians
fleeing civil war and Lebanese who suffered an IS bombing a day
before the attacks in Paris that shook the world. 40 people were killed in the
Beirut bombing.
“When my people died, no country bothered to light up its
landmarks in the colours of their flag, wrote
Elie Fares, a Lebanese doctor. He was referring to landmarks as far flung as Sydney's
Opera House and London's Big Ben that were lit up in France’s tri-couleur to
honour the victims of the Paris attacks and express solidarity.
“When my people dies, they did not send the world into
mourning. Their death was but an irrelevant fleck along the international news
cycle, something that happens in those parts of the world, Fares added,
suggesting that Arab lives mattered less.
Writing on Facebook
against the backdrop of the outpouring of sympathy in the wake of the Paris
attacks, Nour Kabbach, a Syrian refugee from Aleppo said: “Now imagine all that happening
without global sympathy for innocent lives, with no special media updates by
the minute, and without the support of every world leader condemning the
violence.”
The sense of abandonment expressed by Fares
and Kabbach is equally deeply felt in the Brussels suburb of Molenbeek that has
repeatedly popped up as an important link in IS's European network.
Unemployment ranges from 30 to 50 percent in Molenbeek, treble Belgium's
national average.
“Religion is not the main access point (to radicalization).
It is that they cannot see any future for themselves,” Jamal Ikazban, a
left-wing Belgian lawmaker of Moroccan descent and resident of Molenbeek told The New York Times.
French officials and analysts privately concede that
retaliatory French air strikes are likely to do little to defeat IS unless
military efforts are embedded in social and economic policies at home that
address deep-seated and justified concerns. “We are in a period of elections.
The strikes have everything to do with domestic politics at a time that IS has
given the far-right a tremendous boost. They are not going to make a difference
on the ground in Syria,” said one analyst.
James M.
Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies,
co-director of the University of Wuerzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, a
syndicated columnist, and the author of The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog and a forthcoming book with
the same title.
Comments
Post a Comment