Saudi-UAE notions of Islam are at the core of Israeli thinking on post-war Gaza
Thank you for joining me today. I am grateful to those who have
become paid subscribers. I need some more to enable me to continue cutting
through the fog of kinetic and information wars and offer fact-based analysis. No
doubt, you will have noticed that The Turbulent World has no sponsors and no
advertisers. This guarantees the column and podcast’s independence. Instead,
The Turbulent World depends on the support of its readers and listeners to
cover the cost of producing the column and podcast. You can contribute by
clicking on Substack on the subscription button at http://jamesmdorsey.substack.com and choosing one of
the subscription options.
To
watch a video version of this story or listen to an audio podcast click here.
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s government is mulling a proposal for the post-war administration of Gaza that would put the battle to define moderate Islam in the 21st century on the front burner of Middle Eastern politics and allow the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia to export their autocratic notion of ‘moderate’ Islam.
Potentially, the 32-page
proposal, if successfully implemented, would give the two Gulf states a leg
up in their propagation of a socially less restrictive, religiously more
tolerant Islam that rejects democracy and political pluralism, advocated by
Indonesia’s Nahdlatul Ulama, the world’s largest, most moderate Muslim civil
society movement, in favour of a contested Islamic principle of absolute
obedience to the ruler.
Entitled “From a Murderous Regime to a Moderate Society,”
the proposal calls for a
cultural and political revamp of Gaza and the creation of a “moderate
Muslim entity” in the mould of the UAE and Saudi Arabia.
Israel’s
government mulls a proposal for post-war Gaza. Credit: Moshe Dayan Center for
Middle Eastern and African Studies
Some analysts believe that Mr. Netanyahu may refer to the
proposal in his July 24 speech in Washington to both houses of the US Congress
in the knowledge that there is little chance of it being accepted by the Gulf
states without the Israeli government substantially reversing its policy
towards the Palestinians. Mr. Netanyahu has made clear that he has no intention
of doing so.
The proposal envisions a transition phase that would lead to
“an autonomous Palestinian entity” or “demilitarized Palestinian self-rule”
rather than statehood.
Mr. Netanyahu’s National Security Advisor, Tzachi Hanegbi,
described the proposal as “brilliant.”
Israeli textbook watchdog Impact-se implicitly gave the
proposal, put forward by four Israeli academics, a boost by concluding in a
recent study that Saudi Arabia had significantly toned down the portrayal
of Israel and Zionism in textbooks.
In 2022, Impact-se praised the UAE for
mandating schoolbooks that teach tolerance, peaceful coexistence, and
engagement with non-Muslims.
The academics’ proposal rests on long-standing questionable
Israeli assumptions that, over the years, have proven to be inaccurate.
In Gaza, these assumptions include Israel’s belief that it
can create an alternative Palestinian leadership that is not tied to the
West-Bank-based internationally-recognised Palestine Authority (PA) or Hamas.
The 17-year-long Egypt-abetted Israeli blockade of Gaza
failed to persuade Palestinians to push for an alternative to Hamas as the Strip’s
rulers. So has Israel’s sledgehammer response to Hamas’ October 7 attack, even
if many Palestinians hold Hamas alongside Israel responsible for the Gazan
carnage.
Mr. Netanyahu contributed to the failure by encouraging
Qatar to fund the Hamas administration as a way of keeping the Palestinian
polity divided between Hamas and the Palestine Authority and unable to obtain
the cohesiveness Palestinians would have needed to effectively push for the
creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.
Palestinian
rivals meet in April 2024 in China: Credit: The Palestine Chronicle
Multiple Palestinian efforts to achieve reconciliation have
failed. China’s renewed endeavour to bring the two sides together in talks
in Beijing in the coming days is unlikely to fare any better. The Beijing meeting is the second Chinese-sponsored
encounter between the rivals in three months.
Drawing on the experiences of post-World War Two Germany and
Japan and the more recent, less successful US-led invasions of Afghanistan and
Iraq, the proposal argues that the displacement of the Gazan population and the
physical devastation of the Strip has destroyed the socio-political environment
that nurtured Hamas and created new opportunities.
The proposal suggests that Gaza’s transition would facilitate
“the creation of a positive horizon for the defeated nation,” deradicalisation
of the population through “education for peace,” defined as “eradicating
jihadist ambitions,” and the nurturing of a popular repudiation of violence and
embrace of effective governance.
Israel
targets UNRWA in Gaza. Credit: QNA
The proposal calls for the razing of refugee camps; “purification
of the education system” by replacing teachers, rewriting textbooks, and
ensuring supervision of schools and the media; and the substitution with
Israeli-controlled structures of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency
(UNRWA), the foremost international aid group operating in the Strip, and
Hamas’ social and humanitarian programs.
Arguing that the fusion of religion and politics constitutes
part of Gaza’s DNA, the proposal calls for Emirati, Bahraini, and Saudi Sunni
Muslim clerics to guide the remoulding of Gaza and reconstruction of its
education system along the lines of the Gulf states’ notion of ‘moderate’ but
autocratic Islam.
Credit:
QudsNEN
The proposal’s embrace of the UAE and Saudi Arabia’s
autocratic notion of ‘moderate’ Islam gained greater currency with the Emirates
declaring that it may join
a multinational peacekeeping force in Gaza after the war.
"The UAE could consider being part of the stabilisation
forces alongside Arab and international partners…at the invitation of a
reformed PA [Palestinian Authority], or a PA led by an empowered prime
minister," said Lana Nusseibeh, the UAE’s assistant minister for political
affairs and special envoy of the foreign ministry.
Ms. Nusseibeh said UAE participation would depend on the
force being US-led at the invitation of the Palestine Authority and US support
for the creation of an independent Palestinian state.
She said the UAE, with one of the Arab world’s best-trained
militaries, had discussed the force with the United States in an effort to fill
the vacuum in Gaza and address its massive humanitarian and reconstruction
needs.
The UAE, together with Bahrain and Morroco, established
diplomatic relations with Israel in 2020.
UAE’s Lana
Nusseibeh: Credit: AA
A day before her statement, Ms. Nusseibeh insisted in an
op-ed in the Financial Times that any post-war arrangement in Gaza “must
fundamentally alter the trajectory of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict owards the establishment of a Palestinian
state that lives in peace and security with the state of Israel.”
Ms. Nusseibeh went on to say that a first step should
involve “a temporary international mission that responds to the humanitarian
crisis, establishes law and order, lays the groundwork for governance, and
paves the way to reuniting Gaza and the occupied West Bank under a single,
legitimate Palestinian Authority.”
Despite the notion of a peacekeeping force being part of the
academics’ proposal under consideration by the Israeli government, there seemed
to be little chance that Israel would be willing to accept the UAE’s
conditions.
Responding to the International Court of Justice’s opinion
that Israel’s 57-year-long occupation of Gaza, the West Bank, and East
Jerusalem violated international law. Mr. Netanyahu asserted “the Jewish people
are not occupiers in their own land.”
Dr.
James M. Dorsey is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological
University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and the author of
the syndicated column and podcast, The Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.
Comments
Post a Comment