Can Indonesia’s Humanitarian Islam inspire a Hindu nationalist equivalent?
By James M. Dorsey
To watch a
video version of this story on YouTube please click here.
A podcast
version is available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Spreaker, and Podbean.
There's a potential silver lining in Hindu nationalism's endorsement of Indonesia's Humanitarian Islam. That is if the approval produces a Hindu equivalent.
At first glance, Hindu nationalist Ram Madhav’s
call on Indian Muslims to embrace one, if not the world's most moderate
expression of Islam, seems patronising and out of step.
Mr. Madhav is a member of the executive of Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), an almost century-old militant right-wing Hindu
nationalist paramilitary volunteer organisation; former national
secretary-general of India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP); and a close
associate of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
In an essay published by Open, an Indian current
affairs weekly, Mr. Madhav, widely viewed as a moderate among Hindu
nationalists, called on Indian Muslims to adopt a moderate form of Islam
propagated and practiced by Nahdlatul Ulama, the world and Indonesia's largest
Muslim civil society movement.
Nahdlatul Ulama advocates reform of what it calls
"obsolete" and “problematic” elements of Islamic law, including those
that encourage segregation, discrimination, and/or violence towards anyone
perceived to be a non-Muslim.
Humanitarian Islam further recognises equal rights
for Muslims and non-Muslims, unrestricted acceptance of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, and inter-faith relations based on shared common
values.
If adopted by Mr. Madhav’s RSS and BJP, it would be
an approach that would contribute to the restoration of a semblance of societal
harmony in India and help halt the backsliding of the country's democracy.
Several Nahdlatul Ulama-associated bodies welcomed
Mr. Madhav’s endorsement “as an opportunity to place humanitarianism at the heart of interaction between different
faith groups — regardless of religion and across
different sectors of society, ranging from mass organizations to governments —
in order to promote peaceful coexistence and enshrine equal rights before the
law.”
Mr. Madhav's essay appeared against the backdrop of
mounting Hindu-Muslim communal violence that critics believe is fuelled by the
BJP and RSS's anti-Muslim rhetoric and policies. Muslims account for 14 per
cent of India's 1.4 billion population.
Last week, the Delhi working-class neighbourhood of
Jahangirpuri witnessed some of the latest incidents. Riots erupted when participants
in a Hindu procession allegedly brandished weapons and chanted anti-Muslim
slogans as they passed through predominantly Muslim areas. "There was
chaos," said Sudarshan Prasad, a 71-year-old Hindu. I’ve always lived here
in peace. This has not happened in the last 40 years."
Days later, authorities imposed a curfew and cut
off Internet connections in an area of Jodhpur, the capital of northern India’s
Rajasthan state, following altercations between the Hindu and Muslim
communities. The crackdown occurred as Muslims celebrated
Eid al Fitr, the holiday at the end of Ramadan, and Hindus commemorated the
festival of Parshuram Jayanti.
At about the same time, tension was building in the
state of Maharashtra, home to India’s financial capital Mumbai, after Hindu
leaders demanded that Muslims remove loudspeakers from their mosques because
the call to prayer constitutes noise pollution.
Bucking the trend, one Hindu village in the state gifted a loudspeaker to the mosque in a
neighbouring Muslim hamlet as a gesture of harmony.
In his essay. Mr. Madhav insisted that the RSS had
distanced itself from "violent language and talk of annihilation of an
entire community" that he termed "un-Hindu."
Even so, Mr. Madhav went on to say that "the
Indian social leadership needs to stand up to the forces of hatred and violence
by invoking peace, inclusive and a nation-first narrative. India’s narrative of
the decade should be 'it's the economy, stupid.' The onus lies on all of
us."
In an interview with the author, Mr. Madhav
insisted that Hinduism was ‘”very inclusive and very open." He asserted
that no "ideological or philosophical movement that proclaims exclusivity"
exists in Hinduism.
Mr. Madhav argued further that there was no
difference between Hinduism and Hindutava, the Hindu nationalism of the BJP,
and the RSS. However, he conceded that “when confronted
with very hardline things like Wahhabi Islam, it created some kind of a
reaction in some sections, possibly, but Hindutva is not about that. Hindutava
is about core Hindu values.”
Mr. Madhav's reference to Wahhabism was to a
Saudi-inspired austere, ultra-conservative, and supremacist interpretation of
Islam.
Mr. Madhav acknowledged that Hindu-Muslim tensions
would undermine Indian efforts to ensure that the country witnesses the kind of
transformative economic growth that China experienced in the 1980s.
Asserting that the leadership of Indian Muslims,
the world's third-largest Muslim community and its biggest Muslim minority,
adhered to Wahhabism, Mr. Madam wrote that violent elements, whether
"Muslim or Hindu, do not and should not represent our respective
mainstream communities."
Mr. Madhav suggested that the hijab, a head
covering worn by a large number of non-Wahhabi Muslim women, signalled belief
in Wahhabism’s purported purpose of pitting Muslims against non-Muslims.
"A more inclusive and humanitarian Islam on the lines of the one promoted
by organisations like Nahdlatul Ulama...must be the way forward for them,” Mr.
Madhav wrote.
Many of Nahdlatul Ulama’s women activists and
followers sport a hijab while embracing the concept of Humanitarian Islam.
In the interview, Mr. Madhav suggested that his
reference to the hijab was related to a dispute over the headdress after the
BJP-governed state of Karnataka banned it in
schools because it violated the school uniform. A court
later upheld the ban.
In 2020, Mr. Madhav first met with senior Nahdlatul
Ulama leaders on the sidelines of an executive committee meeting of the
conservative Centrist Democratic International (CDI), the world's largest
alliance of political parties, hosted in the Javan city of Jogjakarta by the
Indonesian movement’s political party, National Awakening Party (PKB). Mr.
Madhav attended the CDI meeting as an observer.
Some European and American officials privately hope
that increased engagement with India in response to the war in Ukraine and big
power rivalry in the Indo-Pacific will strengthen the hand of the more moderate
wing of the BJP and the RSS.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has invited Mr. Modi to
attend a summit in June of the Group of 7 (G-7) in the Bavarian Alps. The G-7
groups Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Britain, and the United States.
Mr. Madhav’s embrace of Humanitarian
Islam and Nahdlatul Ulama’s engagement hark back to notions of an Indianized
civilizational sphere that encompassed South and Southeast Asia for nearly
fifteen centuries before the arrival of China, Europe, and Islam in the region.
In a gesture at a time when religious
and cultural sites have been at the centre of disputes and conflict in India
and elsewhere, Indonesia agreed in February to open Prambanan Temple and Borobudur Temple in
Java to worship by Hindus and Buddhists.
The sites had been mainly closed for decades for worship.
In
the interview, Mr. Madhav said he wished to avoid “loaded phrases” like
an Indosphere stretching across Asia's parts. However, "I would say that
Eastern civilizations (and) Eastern religions all share the same civilizational
value system.” Mr. Madhav referenced Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, and “an
Islam with an Eastern value system like Indonesian Islam.”
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an award-winning
journalist and scholar, a Senior Fellow at the National University of
Singapore’s Middle East Institute and Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological
University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and the author of
the syndicated column and blog, The
Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer.
Comments
Post a Comment