Israel’s Ukraine conundrum may have implications for Gulf states
By James M.
Dorsey
Middle
Eastern states see their ability narrow to walk a fine line in the Ukraine
conflict. Israel is a case in point as tensions with Iran in Syria and
Palestinians in Jerusalem flare, and both Russia and the United States signal
impatience with its attempts to straddle the fence.
The United
States has cautioned that it would step
up pressure on countries that fail to sanction Russia but has yet to single
out Israel, home to significant Ukrainian and Russian Jewish communities that
include various oligarchs.
In contrast,
Russia has made its irritation with the Jewish state evident in recent days.
In doing so,
Russia is playing on Israeli fears that Russia could backtrack on its tacit
acquiescence of Israeli attacks on Iranian and Hezbollah targets in Syria,
stiffen support for Iran, and back Palestinians who are clashing with Israeli security
forces in Jerusalem.
Walking a
fine line, Israel
has rejected Ukrainian requests for arms sales and access
to Israeli surveillance technology. However, it has provided humanitarian
assistance to Ukraine shared
intelligence, voted for a United Nations General Assembly resolution condemning
the Russian invasion, and convinced
the United Arab Emirates to do likewise. Israel also voted for an Assembly
resolution suspending Russian membership in the UN Human Rights Council.
However,
Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid’s
assertion that Russia has committed war crimes in Ukraine has tipped the
balance in Moscow.
In a
statement, the Russian foreign ministry charged that Mr. Laipd’s remarks were “a
poorly
camouflaged attempt to take advantage of the situation in Ukraine to
distract the international community's attention from one of the oldest
unsettled conflicts - the Palestine-Israeli one."
Shortly
after that, Russia's ambassador to Israel, Anatoly Viktorov, told an Israeli
television station that Israel
and Russia were “still” friends but that Moscow expected a “more balanced
(Israeli) position.”
Israeli journalist
Zvi Bar'el noted,"’still’ is the operative word, the one that has Israel
in a complex dilemma on the Ukraine question.”
To increase
the pressure, Admiral Oleg Zhuravlev, the deputy chief of the Russian Center
for Reconciliation of the Opposing Parties in Syria, disclosed that a
Syrian-operated, Russian-made Buk M2E air defense system had recently
intercepted a guided missile fired from an Israeli F-16 fighter jet in
Syrian airspace. The disclosure constituted a warning that Russia may no longer
tolerate future Israeli strikes against targets in Syria.
Israeli
military sources suggested that Israel could step up its attacks in the belief
that its window of opportunity in Syria could be closing at a time that Iranian
forces may become more predominant in Syria with Russia shifting troops and
mercenaries to Ukraine.
Iranian
President Ebrahim Raisi warned this week that his
armed forces would not let Israel rest if it took action against the
Islamic republic.
"You
must know that if you try to take any action against the Iranian nation... our
armed forces will not leave you in peace," Mr. Raisi said during a
military parade to mark National Army Day, hinting that Iran could attack
Israel’s metropole, Tel Aviv.
In a similar
shot across Israel’s bow, Russian President Vladimir Putin this week condemned
Israel's escalation of violence at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque in a phone
call with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Mr. Putin assured Mr. Abbas that
Russia would support the Palestinians in international fora.
Furthermore,
Mr. Putin has demanded in a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett
that he transfer
control of Jerusalem’s Church of St. Alexander Nevsky to Russia.
The church,
located in Jerusalem’s Old City, was supposed to be handed over to Russia as
part of a deal two years ago to win the release of an Israeli-American national
detained in Russia on drug charges.
Israeli
justifications of its attempts to walk a middle ground on the back of efforts
to mediate between Mr. Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are
wearing thin as prospects evaporate for a negotiated end to the war any time
soon.
Israeli
officials acknowledge that when rather than if push comes to shove, Israel will
have little choice but to fall in line with the United States and Europe.
“Israel’s
situation has become more complicated,” one Israeli official admitted.
Undoubtedly,
the UAE and Saudi Arabia are closely monitoring how Israel manages what amounts
to a geopolitical minefield.
Like Israel,
the two Gulf states have sought to chart an independent course, rejecting US
demands that they increase oil production to reduce prices and venting anger at
various US policies.
However, in
the ultimate analysis, the Gulf states may find that they, like Israel, have
fewer options than meet the eye.
To watch a video version of this story please
click here.
A podcast version is available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, Spreaker, Pocket Casts, Tumblr, Podbean, Audecibel, Patreon,
and Castbox.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an award-winning
journalist and scholar, a Senior Fellow at the National University of
Singapore’s Middle East Institute and Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang
Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and
the author of the syndicated column and blog, The Turbulent World of Middle East
Soccer.
Comments
Post a Comment