Turkey gambles in bid to rival China as a key supply chain node
By James M.
Dorsey
A projected
sharp reduction in trade between the United States and China in the next two
years coupled with moves to diversify supply chains potentially position Turkey
alongside Vietnam, Mexico, Taiwan and Poland as competitors in efforts to
reduce dependency on the People’s Republic, according to a just published study.
The study,
conducted by the Boston Consulting Group on behalf of the Turkey-US Business
Council (TAIK), suggests that Turkey, located on a fault line that separates
Europe from Asia, has prerequisites to emerge as a winner provided it invests
in its digital, electronics and equipment sectors.
TAIK is an
affiliate of the Foreign Economic Relations Board of Turkey (DEIK), the
country’s oldest and largest business association.
The study
identifies Africa as one region where the US and Turkish firms bring
complimentary assets to the table. Turkey has in recent years significantly
expanded its diplomatic, political, military, and economic footprint in Africa.
Africa is
also a continent where China has made major inroads and could emerge as the
dominant player, particularly in countries like Egypt that risk economic collapse.
Issued
weeks before US President-elect Joe Biden is scheduled to take office, the
study appears intended to underline Turkey’s strategic importance at a time
that the country’s relations with the US and the European Union are strained.
The US
recently slapped Turkey with sanctions for acquiring Russia’s S-400
anti-missile defense system while the EU imposed penalties in response to controversial
Turkish gas drillings in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Increasing
Turkey’s relevance to global trade flows would serve various Turkish
objectives: boosting the country’s economy imperiled by the pandemic, the
global economic downturn, and structural problems as well as capitalizing on
recent geopolitical victories garnered through its military intervention in
Libya, its support for Azerbaijan in this fall’s Caucasus war against Armenia,
and the demonstrated capabilities of its homemade hardware, particularly
drones.
To improve
its chances of becoming a key alternate supply chain node, Turkey has sought to
polish its tarnished image as a disruptive force by attempting to improve
strained relations with two other key regional players, Saudi Arabia and Israel, and pressuring Iran – moves that would please Europe as
well as Mr. Biden.
Finally,
becoming a major alternative to Chinese-controlled supply chains furthers
Turkey’s ambition to exploit something of a power void because of diminished US
regional engagement to carve out its own place in a world in which power is
being rebalanced as a result of big power rivalry.
“The
growing rift between the United States and China creates significant
opportunity for geopolitical cooperation. Turkey and the United States would
both benefit economically,” said a Turkish businessman.
Predicting
that US-China trade would drop by up to US$200 billion in the next two years,
the study suggested that Turkey could significantly enhance its relevance to
the global economy by leveraging its industrial base to exploit underutilized
potential in data and software services and technology start-ups; and invest in
cutting edge electronics and equipment manufacturing in areas such as smart
cities, the Internet of Things, and automation.
The study
warned that countries like Vietnam, Taiwan and Mexico have so far proven more
adept than Turkey at exploiting emerging opportunities. It said the three
countries this year boosted their electronics, automotive, and/or agricultural
sectors by up to 11 percent.
TAIK’s
lobbying agent, Mercury Public Affairs, distributed the study to US policy
and opinionmakers, in an effort to change Washington perceptions of Turkey and
its assertive president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
DEIK, the
Turkish business association, together with TAIK, last week organized a webinar
to highlight contributions of frontline personnel in the fight against COVID-19
who have either Turkish roots or links to Turkey’s allies.
Participants
included Sine Akten, vice president of the Turkish American Medical Association;
Esam Omeish, a Virginia surgeon and president of the Libyan American Alliance
who is believed to be a supporter of the Turkish-backed Government of National
Accor in Libya; and Samia Piracha, the Washington DC Chapter President of the
Association of Physicians of Pakistani-descent in North America
TAIK,
backed by Mr. Erdogan, kicked off its campaign to reposition Turkey with a
webinar in June, entitled ‘A Time for Allies to be Allies: Turkish American
Global Supply Chain,’ that was addressed by influential US Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a close ally of outgoing President
Donald J. Trump.
Mr. Graham
acknowledged Turkey’s importance, noting that going forward Turkey’s
relationship with the United States was likely to be grounded in economic
integration through a free trade agreement.
He
predicted that Africa would be “the prize of the 21st century” and
said that he hoped that the United States and its allies rather than China
would be the continent’s infrastructure and technology provider.
Mr. Graham
cautioned, however, that Turkey’s S-400 acquisition, the resulting US
cancellation of the sale to Turkey of advanced F-35 fighter jets, and Turkey’s
military intervention in northern Syria were the greatest impediments to Turkey
achieving its goal of becoming a key node in reconfigured US supply chains.
“The
potential of this relationship is unlimited, but we’ve got to get over the
friction points. It’s not going to reach its full potential until we get a
resolution to the S-400/F-35 problem. Its not going to reach its full potential
until we can come up with a more sustainable solution to Syria. The sooner we
can get these two issues behind us, the more likely everything becomes a
reality. Confidence building measures, that’s what I’m looking for,” Mr. Graham
said.
Mr. Erdogan
may see his geopolitical successes and attempts at rapprochement with Saudi
Arabia and Israel as confidence-inspiring but that is unlikely how either side
of the Washington divide will perceive them.
Meanwhile,
Turkey’s supply chain competitors appear to be gaining a head start even if the
United States recently branded Vietnam a currency manipulator.
Mr. Erdogan
has so far given little indication that he is willing to budge on Syria or risk
his already complex relationship with Russia by backtracking on the S-400.
Describing
differences with the US and the EU as “artificial agendas,” Mr. Erdogan
this week told his Justice and Development Party’s members of parliament that "Turkey
is facing double standards both over the eastern Mediterranean and the S-400s.
We want to turn a new page with the EU and United States in the new year."
The Turkish
president appears to be gambling on the Biden administration prioritizing the reduction
of dependency on China by adopting policies that are, in the words of international affairs scholar
Aaron L. Friedberg,
“at least partially insulated from day-to-day political pressures.” That could
prove to be a risky bet.
A podcast
version of this story is available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, Spreaker, Pocket Casts, Tumblr, Podbean, Audecibel, Patreon and Castbox.
Dr. James
M. Dorsey is an award-winning journalist and a senior fellow at Nanyang
Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in
Singapore and the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute
Comments
Post a Comment