Chinese purchases of Iranian oil raise tantalizing questions
By James M.
Dorsey
A podcast
version of this story is available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, Spreaker, Pocket Casts and Tumblr
A
fully loaded Chinese oil tanker ploughing its way eastwards from two Iranian
oil terminals raises questions of how far Beijing is willing to go in
defying US sanctions amid a mounting US military build-up in the Gulf and a
US-China trade war.
The sailing
from Iran of the Pacific Bravo takes on added significance with US strategy
likely to remain focused on economic rather than military strangulation of the
Iranian leadership, despite the deployment to the Gulf of an aircraft carrier
strike group as well as B-52 bombers and a Patriot surface-to-air missile
system.
As President
Donald J. Trump, backed
by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, appears to be signalling
that he is not seeking military confrontation, his administration is
reportedly considering a third round of sanctions that would focus
on Iran’s petrochemical industry. The administration earlier this month sanctioned
the country’s metals and minerals trade.
The sailing
raises the question whether China is reversing its policy that led in the last
quarter of 2018 to it dramatically
reducing its trade with Iran, possibly in response to a recent breakdown in
US-Chinese trade talks.
“The
question is whether non-oil trade remains depressed even if some oil sales
resume, which I think it will. That’s the better indicator of where Chinese
risk appetite has changed. Unfortunately Iran‘s reprieve
will be limited—but better than zero perhaps,” tweeted Esfandyar
Batmanghelidj, head of Bourse & Bazaar, a self-described media and business
diplomacy company and the founder of the Europe-Iran Forum.
A Chinese
analyst interviewed by Al Jazeera argued that “China is not in a position to
have Iran’s back… For China, its best to stay out” of the fray.
The stakes
for China go beyond the troubled trade talks. In Canada, a senior executive of
controversial Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei is fighting extradition
to the United States on charges of violating US sanctions against Iran.
Reports that
Western companies, including Kraft Heinz, Adidas and Gap, wittingly or
unwittingly, were employing
Turkic Muslims detained in re-education camps in China’s north-western province
of Xinjiang, as part of opaque supply chains, could increase attention on a
brutal crackdown that China is struggling to keep out of the limelight.
The Trump
administration has repeatedly criticized the crackdown but has stopped short of
sanctioning officials involved in the repressive measures.
Bourse &
Bazaar’s disclosure of the sailing of the Pacific Bravo coincided with analysis
showing that Iran
was not among China’s top three investment targets in the Middle East even
if Chinese investment in the region was on the rise.
The Pacific
Bravo was steaming with its cargo officially toward Indonesia as Iranian foreign
minister Mohammad Javad Zarif
was touring his country’s major oil clients, including China, in a bid to
persuade them to ignore US sanctions.
A second
tanker, the Marshal Z, was reported to have
unloaded 130,000 tonnes of Iranian fuel oil into storage tanks near the Chinese
city of Zhoushan.
The Marshall
Z was one of four ships that, according to Reuters, allegedly helped Iran
circumvent sanctions by using ship-to-ship transfers in January and forged
documents that masked the cargoes as originating from Iraq.
The
unloading put an end to a four-month odyssey at sea sparked by buyers’
reticence to touch a cargo that would put them in the US crosshairs.
“Somebody in
China decided that the steep discount this cargo most likely availed ... was a
bargain too good to miss,” Matt Stanley, an oil broker at StarFuels in Dubai,
told Reuters.
The Pacific
Bravo, the first vessel to load Iranian oil since the Trump administration
recently refused to extend sanction exemptions to eight countries, including China,
was recently
acquired by China’s Bank of Kunlun.
The
acquisition and sailing suggested that Bank of Kunlun was reversing its
decision last December to restrict
its business with Iran to humanitarian trade, effectively excluding all other
transactions.
The bank was
the vehicle China used in the past for business with Iran because it had no
exposure to the United States and as a result was not vulnerable to US
sanctions that were in place prior to the 2015 international agreement that
curbed Iran’s nuclear program.
China’s
willingness to ignore, at least to some extent, US sanctions could also
constitute an effort to persuade Iran to remain fully committed to the nuclear
accord which it has so far upheld despite last year’s US withdrawal.
Iran
recently warned Europe that it
would reduce its compliance if Europe, which has struggled to create a
credible vehicle that would allow non-US companies to circumvent the sanctions,
failed to throw the Islamic republic an economic lifeline.
In a letter
that was also sent to Russia and China, Iran said it was no
longer committed to restrictions on the storage of enriched uranium and heavy
water stocks, and could stop observing limits on uranium enrichment at a
later stage.
Russian
president Vladimir Putin warned in response to the Iranian threat that "as
soon as Iran takes its first reciprocal steps and says that it is leaving,
everyone will forget by tomorrow that the US was the initiator of this
collapse. Iran
will be held responsible, and the global public opinion will be
intentionally changed in this direction."
Dr. James
M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S.
Rajaratnam School of International Studies, an adjunct senior research fellow
at the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute and co-director
of the University of Wuerzburg’s Institute of Fan Culture.
Comments
Post a Comment