Volleyball in Iran: A litmus test for women’s rights
By James M. Dorsey
An international volleyball tournament in the Iranian
capital has thrown into sharp relief a debate in international sporting
associations on how to deal with nations that restrict women’s rights as
athletes and/or spectators. How the Federation Internationale de Volleyball
(FIVB) evaluates next month’s World League in Tehran is likely to shape debate
on how international sports should handle countries guilty of violations of women’s
and human rights.
At stake in the debate is whether international sports
associations should refuse hosting rights to nations who restrict women’s
rights or use the awarding of tournaments as a means of fostering domestic
pressure for the lifting of restrictions. The debate focuses on Iran, which
unlike Saudi Arabia, the only other country that bans women from attending male
sporting events and men from watching women’s competitions, is eager to host
international tournaments.
FIVB, in contrast to world soccer body FIFA which refuses to
award hosting rights to Iran, has argued that a refusal would penalize players
and male rather than female fans in the Islamic republic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUST PUBLISHED: The
Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer. To order: http://www.hurstpublishers.com/book/the-turbulent-world-of-middle-east-soccer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIVB has moreover suggested that forcing women’s entry into
Iranian stadiums was likely to provoke violence against women wanting to
exercise their right. The fact that awarding rights would provoke violence
would seem to favour a refusal to award hosting rights to Iran rather than accept
a reality that is imposed in part by threats of violence.
Iranian backtracking on earlier promises to lift the ban on
women for international volleyball tournaments like the World League in Tehran
and an earlier Asian Football Confederation (AFC) tournament in Iran further calls
into question whether engagement instead of boycott is the more effective
approach.
The glass is half full and half empty in the debate. The
dilemma is built into the charters of international sports associations like
FIVB that champion anti-discrimination but restrain them becoming embroiled in
political and religious issues. Both sides in the volleyball debate sum up
aspects of Iran’s reality and the volleyball federation’s experience in the
country to argue their positions.
Proponents of engagement note that Iran has proven in the
battle over its nuclear program that it is willing and able to sustain
sanctions and unlikely to bend easily when penalized. Iran, they argue, drove a
hard bargain when it finally agreed to serious negotiations.
For their part, opponents of engagement charge that Iran has
repeatedly backtracked on promised concessions. At stake, the opponents say, is
given the failure of the engagement approach the need for international sports
associations to uphold principles and their commitment to values of equality
and universal human rights.
Refusal to demonstrate that commitment, they say, would
reduce their adherence to those principles to lip service and turn it into a
farce. It would also hand a victory to those who threaten violence, a striking
move in a world that vows not to be intimidated by indiscriminate political
violence by the likes of groups like the Islamic State.
FIVB, which has been pushing for Iranian concessions not
only during the World League but also more permanently in Azadi Stadium, Iran’s
flagship sporting facility in Tehran, says it will evaluate the effectiveness
of its engagement in the wake of next month’s tournament.
The FIVB first backed away from its earlier threat to boycott
Iran when it last year went ahead with its Beach Volleyball tournament on Kish
Island, a Muslim-tinted Las Vegas style resort developed before the 1979
Islamic revolution, despite Iran’s backtracking on its consent to women’s
attendance of matches. Iranian officials justified their reversal by pointing
to threats by religious groups that blood would be spilt if women were allowed
to attend.
The FIVB secured a women’s section in the stadium despite
the threats and women believed to be relatives of Iranian volleyball federation
executives rather than from the public attended a couple of matches. Women fans
who travelled to Kish to watch matches were barred entry.
The situation in Tehran next month is likely to be no
different as supporters of President Hassan Rouhani, widely viewed as an
advocate of reduced social controls, and Iranian hardliners battle over Iran’s
future in the wake of the lifting of the nuclear-related international
sanctions. The fact that the battle over women’s unfettered right to attend
sporting rights is part of a larger struggle in Iran significantly reduces the
FIVB’s chances of influencing Iran.
Hard line threats of violence designed as much to intimidate
their opponents as to attempt to keep Iranian moderates in line are not
restricted to sports.
Major General Qasem Soleimani, the head of Iran’s Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force, in an unprecedented response to
this week’s likely deportation by Bahrain of Shiite Sheikh Isa Qassim, warned
that the Gulf state had crossed a red line.
Bahrain stripped Sheikh Isa at the beginning of this week of
his Bahraini nationality. The move against Sheikh Isa was part of a renewed
crackdown on Bahrain’s majority Shiites by the Gulf island’s minority Sunni
rulers.
General Soleimani said the it would spark “the beginning of
a bloody uprising” that would lead to the “annihilation” of the country’s “bloodthirsty
regime.”.
The warning by General Soleimani, who commands IGRC forces
in Syria that support the regime of President Bashar al-Assad and who played a
key role in shaping Shiite militias confronting the Islamic State in Iraq, was
directed as much at Bahrain as it was at those in Mr. Rouhani’s government who
want to reduce tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Ironically, Bahrain’s move against Sheikh Isa serves the
purpose of Saudi Arabia which has been seeking to strengthen Iranian hardliners
as part of its struggle with Iran over regional dominance in the Middle East.
Like when it executed a prominent Saudi Shiite cleric in January, Saudi Arabia
hopes that strengthened Iranian hard liners will obstruct Mr. Rouhani’s
US-backed efforts to return Iran to the international fold.
The Iranian power struggle and its role in the covert war
between Iran and Saudi Arabia constitutes a high stakes battle that is far
beyond the paygrade of internationals sports associations like the FIVB. With
Mr. Rouhani and Iranian moderates having bigger fish to fry, it precludes the
FIVB from getting any real foot on the ground in its effort to secure women’s
rights. Under the circumstances, the FIVB and international sports associations
are best served by upholding principles and standing on the side lines until
the dust settles and new opportunities arise.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S.
Rajaratnam School of International Studies, co-director of the University of
Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, and the author of The Turbulent World
of Middle East Soccer blog and a just
published book with the same title.
Comments
Post a Comment