Israel’s military has a crisis even if it refuses to admit it
Credit: Al
Jazeera
By James M. Dorsey
Hi and welcome. Thank you for joining
me today. If you appreciate hard-hitting, fact-based analysis, please take
advantage of my New Year’s special offer of a 25 percent discount on
annual subscriptions.
If you are a free subscriber, you can
upgrade to a paid subscriber at the special rate. Monthly subscribers can
upgrade to an annual subscription at the discounted rate.
To upgrade, please click here
Paid subscribers can access the full
archive, exclusive posts, and polling. They can leave comments, join debates,
and know they are supporting independent writing, reporting, and analysis that
lets the chips fall where they fall.
Thank you for your support and loyalty
and best wishes for the new year.
Israel’s once-vaunted military faces an uncertain future.
Not just because the International Court
of Justice (ICJ) is set to judge Israel's Gaza war conduct and the issuance
by the International Criminal Court (ICC) of arrest warrants for
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.
But also due to assertions that the military is unable or
unwilling to enforce discipline, questioning of the military’s capacity to
investigate itself, a long-held US-supported holy grail of the military’s self-perception
as “the
world’s most moral army,” and the rise of an officer corps infused by
religious ultra-nationalism.
In addition, several recent books by Israeli veterans of the
Gaza war belie the military’s moral claim and document the traumatic fallout of
Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attack on Israel that killed some 1,200 people, mostly
civilians, as well as 15 months of combat in the Strip.
Israelis, pointing to the military’s tactical successes in
seriously weakening Hamas and Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah, obliterating
the Syrian military, and striking effectively at Iran and Yemen’s Houthi
rebels, may dismiss international efforts to hold Israel and its military
accountable as the product of a world that is fundamentally anti-Semitic.
That argument will not hold sway when,
not if, Israel finally launches an inevitable inquiry into what led to the
attack that sparked multiple wars in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria, and Israeli
strikes against Iran and Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.
Mr. Netanyahu, who has refused
to accept responsibility for the policy, intelligence, and operational
failures that led to October 7, has successfully
delayed an inquiry until the Gaza war ends.
The delay means Israel and its military have yet to be
presented with the entire bill for their war conduct.
Already, the delay has contributed to Israel’s conviction in
the international court of public opinion and the proceedings in international
courts.
The violations of international legal norms evidenced by the
targeting of hospitals,
schools, and alleged ‘safe zones’ for Gaza’s largely displaced population, the selfies
posted by Israeli military personnel on social media documenting their
violations, obstruction of the flow into Gaza of humanitarian
aid, and Israel’s refusal to negotiate an equitable resolution of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, make Israel’s condemnation in the international
court of public opinion an open-and-shut case.
No doubt accurate Israeli assertions that Hamas
embeds itself among Gaza’s civilian population and diverts some of the
sparse humanitarian aid that makes it into the Strip fail to justify Israel’s
war conduct and kill ratio.
Even so, rather than address the military’s structural
problems and question a policy that produces escalating violence instead of
security, Mr. Netanyahu and Israel’s political and military elite have placed
an uncertain bet that President-elect Donald J. Trump will give them the rope
they need to maintain business as usual.
Mr. Netanyahu and the elite are also betting that their
sledgehammer strategy will reinforce the seemingly mounting Gazan rejection of
Hamas. A recent opinion poll suggested that Hamas would lose
any election in the Strip.
Palestinians pay an unconscionable price in death and
destruction, while Israelis are only beginning to reaslise the cost of Mr.
Netanyahu and the elite’s bet.
This week, a Brazilian
court issued an arrest warrant for a visiting Israeli soldier on charges of
Gaza war crimes, in an indication of what may be coming down the pike.
A Belgium-based group has filed similar complaints against
Israel’s military attaché in Brussels and a soldier traveling in Sri Lanka.
Last month, the military warned dozens of soldiers against
traveling abroad after some 30 soldiers who fought in Gaza had war crimes
complaints filed against them.
Amos Harel, Israeli newspaper Haaretz’s military
correspondent, argued that
Israel’s current devastating siege and pounding of northern Gaza is the
result of the military’s structural problems and the government’s failed
policies, including its refusal to accept a ceasefire that would end the war.
The almost three-month-long siege of Jabaliya and its
refugee camp “looks more like an
operation done out of inertia… Without (a ceasefire) agreement, it's likely
that the operation will spread to other parts of the northern Gaza Strip,
involving a systematic removal of the civilian population from the entire
region,” Mr. Harel said.
If anything, Mr. Harel argues that what he describes as
inertia is the result of Israel’s failure to achieve its goal of destroying
Hamas and creating space for a Palestinian administration of Gaza that would be
subservient to Israel.
“Hamas controls the humanitarian aid supplies, making money
off it and imposing its rule over most of the population. Its military recovery
is limited, and at this point, it does not pose a real threat to communities
along the Gaza border, despite a slight increase in the firing of rockets from
the northern Gaza Strip,” Mr. Harel said.
Israeli media reported that Hamas and Islamic
Jihad, the second major militia in Gaza, has expanded to as many as 23,000 men
under arms, primarily new recruits,, contradicting government claims that
the war had definitively decimated the group’s military rank and file.
Mr. Harel’s ‘inertia’ is a misnomer for a military that has
been brutalised by more than half a century of occupation of Palestinian lands
that is designed to humiliate, coerce, and intimidate and that recruits a significant
segment of its officer corps from ultra-nationalist, ultra-conservative government-subsidised
pre-military religious schools run by militant rabbis.
Brig. Gen.
Yehuda Vlach
A recent Haaretz investigation of Brig. Gen. Yehuda Vach tells the story
based on interviews with his subordinates, who were willing to speak out.
A graduate of the Bnei David pre-army preparatory yeshiva or
religious seminary that at one point featured a quote on its wall by one of its
instructors, Rabbi Joseph Kalner, charging that “all secular Jews are traitors,
and the state can do anything to sanction them, including putting a bullet
through their head,” Mr. Vach commands the military’s 252nd division.
The investigation described how Mr. Vach has so far gotten
away with setting his own goals and rules of engagement in Gaza in violation of
official government policy and the military’s rules and codes.
The investigation exposed the arbitrariness and banality
with which soldiers under his command killed Palestinians because “there are no
innocents in Gaza.”
Moreover, he has sought to remove some 250,000 Palestinians
from northern Gaza on the principle that “only by losing land will the
Palestinians learn the necessary lesson.”
To be sure, in doing so, he may be adhering to an undeclared
government policy.
Mr. Vlach enlisted his brother, Col. (res.) Golan Vach, the
commander of the military’s Pladot Heavy Engineering Equipment unit, populated by
young ultra-nationalist, vigilante West Bank settlers, often described as
hilltop youth.
Col. Vlach’s unit "was a team of soldiers and civilians
who look like hilltop youth. The force's sole objective was to demolish Gaza,"
one officer said.
Furthermore, Gen. Vlach advised his troops to harass humanitarian aid convoys to ensure that trucks would not enter northern Gaza in support of a population subjected to inhuman conditions.
Israeli politicians reinforce the inclinations of the
influential ultra-nationalist and ultra-conservative segment of the military’s
officer corps.
This week, coalition members of the Israeli parliament’s
Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee called on Defense Minister Israel Katz to
order the destruction
of all sources of water, food, and energy in northern Gaza to ensure Hamas'
defeat.
In a letter to Mr. Katz, the lawmakers asserted that the
siege of northern Gaza does “not enable achieving the war objectives as defined
by the government, which is the dismantling of Hamas' governing and military
capabilities."
The lawmakers demanded that the military kill anyone moving
in northern Gaza and elsewhere in the Strip who "doesn't come out with a
white flag."
The Vlach brothers are but one example of the military’s
failure to enforce discipline, adheree
to international and Israeli military norms, and credibly investigate
violations.
Last year, media investigations revealed that the military
was using Palestinians as human
shields to protect soldiers and inspect suspected booby-trapped tunnels.
Israel repeatedly justifies its targeting of civilians and
civilian infrastructure by asserting that Hamas uses Palestinians as human
shields by embedding itself in civilian infrastructure.
Credit:
Btselem
At the time, the military said it banned the use of human
shields and was investigating alleged incidents.
This month, Mr. Harel, the Haaretz correspondent, reported
that the military continued to use human shields.
The list of military investigations called into question by
critics goes on and on.
An anthropologist, Lt. Col. (res.) Asaf Hazani described
in the latest
book by Israeli veterans of the Gaza war soldiers’ insensitivity to the
Palestinians’ plight through the “insane gaze” in some of their eyes. The book
focuses on the early stages of the war.
Many of the soldiers were traumatised by the carnage they
encountered on October 7 in the wake of the Hamas assault on Israeli
communities bordering on Gaza and the subsequent fighting in urban areas of the
Strip.
Asaf
Hazani’s book, s as "One Way or Another the Sword Shall Devour –
Anthropology in War: A Field Diary."
Mr. Hazani said it was "as if a thin veil covered their
eyes. ... They looked through you. The main point is that those eyes don't
allow interaction... That gaze can explain both Israel's insensitivity to the
suffering in Gaza and the aggressive method of war adopted by the IDF,"
the Israel Defence Forces, Mr. Hazani said.
He added that the war "challenges us on the question of
the limits of what is human, ours and theirs."
The military reported this week that 28 soldiers had
committed suicide since October 7, 2023, a sharp increase compared to the two
preceding years. The military further said that thousands
of reservists had stopped serving in combat roles due to mental stress.
Mr. Hazani suggested that Israel’s insistence on continuing
the Gaza war was not just a result of Mr. Netanyahu’s prioritization of his
personal interest to salvage his political hide but also of a traumatised
military. A prolonged war offers many soldiers an escape.
In one instance, Mr. Hazani describes a unit that insisted
on remaining active because the one time the unit took a break since October 7,
the soldiers "lost it. … (their) options are to escape into carrying out
missions or to go crazy."
Mr. Hazani dates Israel’s failure to achieve its war goals
to the period after the six-day ceasefire in November 2023.
“The fighting in Gaza started to look like…a long-term
occupation, only bloodier. The friction with the population increased, and with
it the enemy's actions. The enemy, whom we didn't encounter in the first stage
and was described as contemptible or despicable, became a professional
adversary that exploited our weak points and waged guerrilla warfare," Mr.
Hazani said.
It's a reality that Israel risks confronting for years to
come. The Gaza war highlights the toll it has already taken on the military and
Israel itself.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an Adjunct
Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of
International Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and podcast, The
Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.
Comments
Post a Comment