Multiple time bombs likely to threaten a Gaza ceasefire from day one
Thank you for joining me today. I am grateful to those who have
become paid subscribers. I need some more to enable me to continue cutting
through the fog of kinetic and information wars and offer fact-based analysis. No
doubt, you will have noticed that The Turbulent World has no sponsors and no
advertisers. This guarantees the column and podcast’s independence. Instead,
The Turbulent World depends on the support of its readers and listeners to
cover the cost of producing the column and podcast. You can contribute by
clicking on Substack on the subscription button at http://jamesmdorsey.substack.com and choosing one of
the subscription options.
To watch a video version of this story or
listen to an audio podcast click here.
Thank you for your support and loyalty.
Gaza’s desperately needed but increasingly elusive
ceasefire, if achieved, is likely to be fragile, threatened by multiple ticking
time bombs that could explode at any given moment unless it is embedded in a
political process that culminates with the creation of an independent
Palestinian state.
The time bombs are ticking with or without a ceasefire but
will likely be accentuated if and when the guns fall silent.
For starters, the ceasefire agreement being negotiated
includes no provision for who will administer Gaza from day one.
As a result, control of Gaza is at the core of the gap
between Hamas’ demand for an end to the war and a complete Israeli withdrawal
from the Strip and Israel’s insistence on a continued military presence and a
continuation of the war once the Hamas-held hostages have been released.
A US-Qatari-Egyptian proposal to narrow the gap has done
everything but close the gap, despite Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s
assertion after three hours of talks with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu
that Israel had accepted the plan.
Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu tells US Secretary of State Antony Blinken that
Israel accepts a ceasefire deal. Credit: EPA
“Netanyahu endorsed the US proposal — which incorporated
several of his updated demands — knowing Hamas would reject it. His public
statement that Israeli negotiators were "cautiously optimistic"…was political
posturing. Any gaps that were narrowed in Doha were between the US and
Israeli positions, not Israel and Hamas,” journalist Barak Ravid quoted Israeli
officials as saying.
Meanwhile, Mr. Netanyahu has ruled out a return of Hamas or
the international community’s preferred candidate, President Mahmoud Abbas’s
West Bank-based Palestine Authority.
In their place, Mr.
Netanyahu has spoken vaguely about an administration
of non-aligned Gazan clan leaders and businessmen operating under Israeli
tutelage.
Last week, Mr. Abbas announced in an address to the Turkish
parliament his intention
to visit Gaza. There was no indication that Israel would allow him to
assert his authority in the Strip.
Taking issue with Mr. Netanyahu’s war strategy, Israeli
military leaders, convinced that Mr. Netanyahu’s goal of destroying Hamas is
unachievable, have gone as far as suggesting they
could live with Hamas’ temporary return to power, while Hamas has indicated
it would accept a non-aligned government populated by Palestinians approved by
the group and the Palestine Authority.
The United States’s Arab allies, including the United Arab
Emirates, insist they will only contribute to an
international peacekeeping force if there is a credible, irreversible
pathway to an independent Palestinian state, a concept Mr. Netanyahu and the
Knesset, the Israeli parliament, have ruled out.
Moreover, US President Joe Biden’s ceasefire proposal envisions
the unfettered flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza from day one but has
relegated reconstruction of the devastated Strip to the plan’s third phase.
The US-Qatari-Egyptian bridging proposal pushes
back to the ceasefire’s second phase a lifting of the Israeli siege of Gaza and
discussions about reconstruction, according to a Hamas official.
The proposal suggests that whatever administration emerges
from Gaza’s rubble will be unable to immediately rebuild essential
infrastructure, such as water and electricity facilities, hospitals, schools,
and shelters.
Failure to meet Gazans’ basic needs, coupled with the lack
of a political process that holds out the promise of a Palestinian state, is
likely to perpetuate Palestinians’ belief that they have nothing to lose.
Failure to meet those needs, coupled with the lack of a
political process that holds out the promise of a Palestinian state, is likely
to perpetuate Palestinians’ belief that they have nothing to lose.
As a result, any ceasefire, even if deemed permanent, is
likely to be temporary. The only question is for how long.
For Palestinians, the ceasefire will be little more than a
breathing space to alleviate suffering. It will not be a long-term acceptable
status quo. The same is likely to be true for Mr. Netanyahu and Israel’s
ultra-nationalists.
Adding fuel to the fire is Israel’s long-standing
failed effort to quash Palestinian national aspirations that involve collective
punishment, an apparent key driver of the military’s indiscriminate destruction
of Gaza. In doing so, Israel is Palestinian militants’ most effective
recruitment tool.
Experts say it’ll
take 10-15yrs just to clear the rubble. Forget reconstruction. #Hamas couldn’t have hoped for better conditions
to secure its future,”
tweeted Middle East analyst Charles Lister.
Like Israeli punitive operations in the West Bank, where
bulldozers destroy the homes of families of Palestinians suspected of resisting
the occupation, Israel doesn’t just hunt down Palestinian fighters in Gaza. It
destroys their homes on an industrial scale.
In the last 48 hours, Israeli attacks targeting residential
buildings, makeshift shelters for displaced Palestinians, and groups of people
across Gaza killed
at least 74 people, including at least 20 children.
Yousef, a Hamas supporter and wannabe fighter in what
remains of Al-Shuja’iyya, east of Gaza City, once home to 100,000 people, recently
recalled watching an Israeli drone track five members of the Al-Qassam
Brigades, Hamas’ military wing, as they gathered in front of a restaurant.
Within seconds, three missiles hit the group, killing the
five fighters. Yousef said the fighters’ homes were subsequently believed to
have been targeted and destroyed. The policy of destroying family homes is
likely one explanation for the continuous Israeli bombing of residential
buildings, causing high civilian casualties.
“Whenever I got the chance to meet up with them or spend
time with them when they weren’t out fighting, I
knew what I wanted to do next. I want to fight like them,” Yousef, who
buried the fighters after the attack, told Mondoweiss, suggesting Israel’s
policy of collective punishment was backfiring.
Fighting in
Al-Shuja’iyya. Credit: Mehr News Agency
It’s impossible to assess how representative Yousef’s
aspirations are. Even so, Yousef seems to be a mirror image of Israelis, who,
in the wake of Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel that sparked the Gaza war,
blame all Gazans for the group’s atrocities and are unable
to empathise with the plight of innocent Palestinian civilians.
“Israel thinks that it is terrorizing us with its crimes,
but we no longer want anything except revenge for the blood of our people. We
want revenge for the people Israel killed and let their flesh be eaten by dogs
in front of us, and we could not save them. They shot anyone on sight. This is
a criminal army, and we must confront it. Everyone on our land must fight it
until we eradicate it,” said Yousef, who, although not a fighter, owns an AK-47
and has received basic military training in Hamas summer camps, attended by
many young Gazans.
The training involved military and scouting skills, shooting
with live ammunition, assembling and disassembling assault rifles, Civil
Defense basics, and first aid courses.
“The camps prepared us for such moments, to be ready to face
this criminal army that killed our families. Now we are ready, and we are
waiting to engage in the fight,’ Yousef said.
Gaza
children train in the use of weapons. Credit: Hamas
“All the sadness and the destruction motivate me, and all
those I love are in Paradise. They’re martyrs who fell before me, and they’re
waiting for me to join them. The occupation is creating generations that want
to be free at any cost, no matter how much blood it sheds,” he added,
sentiments reflective of a generation with nothing to lose and little to look
forward to.
“When I talk to anyone in Al-Shuja’iyya, they all want the
same thing. They want to leave an impact instead of dying helplessly and
getting cut up into pieces or being eaten by dogs in the street,” Yousef said.
The Al-Qassem Brigades claimed it
trained 25,000 people each year before the war.
Yousef’s attitude suggests that rebuilding Gaza will have to
entail far more than the physical reconstruction of destroyed homes and
infrastructure.
It suggests Mr. Netanyahu’s notion of “reeducation” to
ensure Palestinians buy into Israel’s version of the history of
Israeli-Palestinian relations is not only morally and politically wrong but
also a non-starter.
Much like addressing Israel’s Gaza war trauma expressed in
Israeli perceptions of security is central to ceasefire negotiations and
thinking of a pathway to a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,
Palestinians’ trauma will have to be tackled by acknowledging their national
aspirations on a mirror-image basis. In other words, what is true for Israeli
concerns is equally valid for Palestinian anxieties.
Dr.
James M. Dorsey is an Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological
University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and the author of
the syndicated column and podcast, The Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.
Comments
Post a Comment