Is Central Asia and the Caucasus the Indo-Pacific’s next stop?
By James M.
Dorsey
To
watch a video version of this story on YouTube please click here.
A podcast version is
available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, and Spreaker.
America to
the rescue. In a twist of irony, that may be Central Asia's only alternative,
with the Russian invasion of Ukraine upsetting the region's security apple
cart.
The question
is whether the United States, already rejiggering its commitment to security in
the Middle East, has the will and wherewithal to engage.
Depending on
one’s analysis of the Middle East’s strategic importance, the glass is either
half full or half empty.
With the US
wanting to focus on the Indo-Pacific, it has reduced interest in the Middle
East. Yet, there is no cohesive Indo-Pacific strategy that fails to include the
Arabian Sea, the Western mouth of the Indo-Pacific.
A similar
argument could be made for Central Asia, a potential land-based counterpart to
the maritime Indo-Pacific in Russia’s soft underbelly and China’s western
flank.
The notion
of an enhanced US security role in Central Asia and the Caucasus may seem
far-fetched but no longer are the days when a Central Asian leader would invite
Russia or the Russian-led Central Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) to quell
domestic unrest.
That’s what
Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev did in January 2022, a month before
Russia invaded Uzbekistan.
The invasion
has put in a different perspective long-standing Russian assertions that
Kazakhstan is not a nation but "a Russian-speaking country in the full sense of the word."
That is President Vladimir Putin’s way of saying that Kazakhstan is part of the
Russian world.
As a result,
Central Asian leaders no longer see Russia as a trustworthy security guarantor
and, worse, a potential threat. At the same time, regional leaders are hesitant
to depend more on China than they already are economically. Theoretically, that
leaves the United States as their only option.
Russia’s
failure to secure free transit along the Lachin corridor linking the disputed
autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia, a fellow CSTO member, has deepened a lack of confidence in
Russia.
Nagorno-Karabakh
lies within Azerbaijan but has been under the control of ethnic Armenian forces
backed by Armenia since a separatist war in the 1990s. That conflict also left large
chunks of surrounding lands in Armenian hands.
In 44 days
of fighting in September 2020, the Azerbaijani military routed Armenian forces
This forced Armenia to accept a Russia-brokered peace deal that saw the return
of a significant part of Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan.
Russia
deployed nearly 2,000 peacekeepers to ensure safe transit across the region and
monitor the peace deal.
But travel through
the Lachin corridor has been blocked since December by Azerbaijanis identifying
themselves as environmental activists and the opening last month of an Azerbaijani military checkpoint.
The Russian
refusal to force the reopening of the corridor paved the way for renewed US mediation.
US Secretary
of State Antony Blinken said last week that US-hosted talks in Washington between
the Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign ministers had “discussed some very tough
issues over the last few days and they’ve made tangible progress on a durable
peace agreement. We really are within reach of an agreement.”
The effect
of a successful mediation would ripple far beyond the southern Caucasus even if
Russia has indicated that it would not accept an agreement that was not based on the 2020
Russian-brokered ceasefire.
Armenian
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was scheduled to visit Moscow this week to participate in
celebrations of Russia’s victory in World War Two.
The US mediation
comes as relations between Azerbaijan and Iran are deteriorating quickly while
the former Soviet republic’s ties to Israel are expanding.
Mukhtar
Mammadov arrived in March in Tel Aviv to take up his post as Azerbaijan’s first
ambassador to Israel, even though the two countries established diplomatic
relations 30 years ago.
On a visit
to Baku last month, Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen announced that his
country would supply Azerbaijan with two satellites worth US$120 million.
Israeli drones are believed to have played a crucial role in Azerbaijan’s
victory in the 2020 war.
The
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute identified Israel as Azerbaijan’s second-largest
arms supplier after
Russia between 2011 and 2020.
Haaretz
newspaper reported in March that Azerbaijan’s Silk Way Airlines had
operated 92 flights to the Israeli southern airport of Ovda in the past seven years. The cargo
airline is one of few operators authorised to transport explosives through
Israeli airspace.
Iran sees
the deepening of relations with Israel as part of a strategy to further isolate
the Islamic republic by disrupting its trade with Russia and Central Asia.
Russia and Iran are both seeking to evade crippling US sanctions.
It also
fears that Azerbaijan may allow Israel to use its airbases and/or airspace for
a potential strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.
In his first
interview after arriving in Tel Aviv, Mr. Mammadov denied that Azerbaijan would
facilitate an Israeli attack.
Days later,
Mr. Cohen said at the opening of the embassy in the presence of his Azerbaijani
counterpart, Jeyhun Bayramov, that the two countries had agreed to form a
"united front against Iran."
Iran also
worries that Israeli agricultural companies that have created ‘smart villages’ in areas close to its border
captured by Azerbaijan during the 2020 war can eavesdrop on the Iranians.
In March,
the Israel Institute of Technology or
Technion helped Azerbaijan establish a cybersecurity center in Baku.
Iran is
further concerned that a planned corridor connecting Azerbaijan and its
Nakhchivan enclave inside Armenia to Russia and Turkey could change the
Iranian-Armenian border.
“This
corridor crosses the border of Iran with Armenia, and its implementation means removing Iran from the geopolitics of
the Caucasus,” said
a Tehran-based foreign policy analyst.
“Iran’s way
to Europe is through Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey. If Armenia’s (Nakhchivan)
province also falls into the hands of Azerbaijan, it will officially become a
big leverage… Iran will lose the whole of Central Asia, and this is a
catastrophe for Iran,” the analyst added.
Iranian
concerns are fuelled by hopes that closer cooperation with Russia will revitalise
a two decade-old effort to create a 7,200 kilometre North South transport corridor, dubbed the International
North-South Trade Corridor (INSTC), that would link India and the Gulf to
Central Asia, Russia, and Europe.
Last month, Russia
began exporting fuel to Iran by rail through Kazakhstan and
Turkmenistan. In
addition, trains have ferried 12 million tonnes of Russian grain via Iran to India.
Nevertheless,
Azerbaijani-Iranian friction delayed plans to complete a 170-kilometre
rail line that would
link the Iranian provincial city of Rasht to the Azerbaijani border town of
Astara, a key node in a trans-Caspian Sea route.
Meanwhile, Iran’s
Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Line Group has invested in a Russian port on the Volga River. At the same
time, Iran is finalizing rules governing Iranian right of passage on the Volga and Don rivers.
To
underscore its concerns, Iran has deployed troops and held military exercises
on its border with Azerbaijan.
Heightening
tensions, Azerbaijan and Iran expelled some of each other’s diplomats last week.
The
expulsions followed an attack in January on the Azerbaijani
embassy in Tehran in
which a security guard was killed. In addition, there was an assassination attempt in March on Jan Fazil Mustafa, an Azerbaijani parliamentarian
critical of Iranian influence.
Last
November, Azerbaijan arrested several people on charges of
spying for Iran.
On a visit
to Central Asia in March, Mr. Blinken sought
to capitalise on concerns about Russia and China and breathe new life into
America’s relations with the Central Asian republics.
“We remain committed to standing for
the sovereignty, the territorial integrity, the independence not only of
Ukraine, but for countries across Central Asia and, indeed, around the world,” Mr.
Blinken told journalists in the Uzbek capital Tashkent.
To make that
commitment credible, the United States will have to do more than the US$50 million it
allocated in 2022 and 2023 “to expand regional trade routes, establish new export markets, attract
and leverage greater private sector investment.”
US$50
million pales compared to China and Russia’s billions of dollars invested in
recent decades.
The US
strategy seems to involve a division of labour in which the United States
focuses on geopolitics while Europe is expected to increase its economic
engagement with Central Asian states.
“Washington's
role as a powerful but distant and supportive friend to the region can help Central Asian countries achieve
their stated goals
of regional cooperation and a balanced, ‘multi-vector’ relationship with the
outside world,” said Central Asia scholar Gavin Helf.
Thank you for joining me today. I hope you enjoyed the
newsletter and/or podcast. Diplomats, policymakers, investors, executives,
journalists and academics listen to my twice-weekly podcast and/or read my
syndicated newsletter that is republished by media across the globe.
Maintaining free distribution ensures that the podcast and newsletter have
maximum impact Paid subscribers help me cover the monthly cost of producing the
newsletter and podcast. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber. You can do
so by clicking on Substack on the subscription button at www.jamesmdorsey.substack.com and choosing one of the subscription options or support me on Patreon at
www.patreon.com/mideastsoccer. Please join me for my next
podcast in the coming days. Thank you, take care and best wishes.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an award-winning
journalist and scholar, an Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological
University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and the author of
the syndicated column and podcast, The Turbulent World with James M.
Dorsey.
Comments
Post a Comment