Scoring an own goal: US Middle East policy misses the plank
By James M. Dorsey
To watch
a video version of this story on YouTube please click here.
A
podcast version is available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Spreaker, and Podbean.
The Biden administration excels in scoring its own
goals, nowhere more so than in the Middle East.
Missed in the hype of Chinese President Xi Jinping's
recent visit to Saudi Arabia is that no part of the world lends itself more
than the Middle East to put into practice the administration's vision of a
world in which the United States and China simultaneously cooperate and compete.
Yet, comparing the
pomp and circumstance accorded Mr. Xi to the low-key, humbling reception of
President Joe Biden when he went on a pilgrimage to Jeddah in July to repair
legitimately strained relations with the kingdom demonstrates that US policy is
backfiring.
Rather than ensuring a level playing field, US policy
creates an opportunity for China.
“China is making a long-term play, both for its own
sake, and to stymie and confuse American goals in Eurasia. China’s Middle
Eastern arms sales, mooted military bases, and yuan-denominated futures
contracts and purchases bring military and financial dimensions to Sino-US competition
in the Gulf. The US is not prepared for this challenge,” said scholar Lucille
Greer in a just published book.
To be sure, bad blood plays a role in US-Saudi
troubles.
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will not
forgive Mr. Biden for publicly holding him responsible
for the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, albeit in word
rather than deed, and for the optics of the
administration’s harsh verbal response to the kingdom’s refusal to push OPEC+, the
cartel of oil-producing countries plus Russia, to increase production.
Even so, the Xi visit, despite long-term Chinese
ambitions, was as much about strengthening the Gulf's hand in demanding clarity
on the future US commitment to Gulf security and wanting to formalise
arrangements as it was about China capitalising politically and economically on strains in US-Saudi
relations.
Given the personal animosity between Messrs. Bin
Salman and Biden, Saudi Arabia has left it primarily to the United Arab
Emirates to spell out what the Gulf wants from the United States.
Speaking three weeks before the Chinese leader’s
visit, Anwar Gargash, the diplomatic adviser of United Arab Emirates President
Mohammed bin Zayed, insisted that “our primary strategic security relationship
remains unequivocally with the United States… Yet, it is vital that we find a
way to ensure
that we can rely on this relationship for decades to come through clear,
codified, and unambivalent commitments.”
In response, the United States will have to do
more than lay down red lines regarding networks and critical infrastructure
like senior Pentagon official Colin Kahl did at a recent security conference in
Bahrain.
To bridge the growing trust gap, the United States
will have to respond in positive and confidence-inspiring terms to Mr.
Gargash's demand.
Mr. Xi demonstrated his
understanding of the efficacy of being attentive to Gulf concerns when he
agreed during his visit to a joint statement that stressed the need to
"strengthen joint cooperation to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's
nuclear program" and for Iran to respect "principles of good neighbourliness."
The acknowledgement was in line with Chinese policy
but served as a reassurance to Saudi Arabia given China’s close relations with
Iran.
Saudi Arabia worries about an Iran that potentially is
a threshold nuclear power and supports non-state militias in various Middle
Eastern countries.
To be sure, the United States has long confronted
Iranian ambitions.
Nevertheless, the United States has an interest in being
explicit rather than implicit in its response to the demand articulated by Mr.
Gargash, even if that may be a political hot potato in Washington.
Since the days of President Barak Obama, the US has
fuelled doubts by its talk of a ‘pivot to
Asia’ and Mr. Biden's focus on
the Indo-Pacific.
It takes a cursory look at a map to
recognise that there is no viable Indo-Pacific strategy that does not include
its western flank, the Arabian Sea.
With the Gulf, the United States, and China in
fundamental agreement on maintaining the Middle East’s current security
architecture, Chinese military sales, nuclear cooperation, and technology,
particularly its nuclear, military, and dual-purpose applications, are likely
to be major frontlines in regional US-Chinese competition.
That didn’t prevent Huawei Technologies from signing an agreement during Mr.
Xi’ visit related
to cloud computing, data centres and building high-tech complexes in Saudi
cities, despite US
warnings that networks and equipment produced by Chinese companies like Huawei
could contain technologies to gather intelligence that
are embedded in ways that make them undetectable.
While the US dominates militarily in the competition
with China as the Gulf's primary weapons supplier, it has yet to find an effective
way in leveraging its advantage.
To a degree, the US is hobbled by its justified
conditions on sales that have stopped it from selling to Saudi Arabia
cutting-edge killer drones and ballistic missiles – areas where Chinese
weaponry has made inroads in the kingdom.
With good reason, the United States also puts stringent
regulatory conditions on its nuclear sales.
Even so, the United States has trump cards it can
play.
Beyond the agreement that the United States has a
primary role to play and arms sales, it’s the United States rather than China
that is helping
Saudi Arabia complete an overhaul of its defense and national security
architecture, the most radical military reform since the creation
of the kingdom in 1932.
The reforms aim to enable the kingdom to defend
itself, absorb and utilize US weapons systems, and make meaningful military and
defense contributions to regional security, according to political-military
analyst and former Pentagon official Bilal Y. Saab.
“Through the vehicle of defense reform, the Biden
administration has an opportunity to engage the Saudis on critical national
security matters while safeguarding US strategic interests and honouring
American values,” Mr. Saab said.
“It's a wise form of US assistance that isn't
politically controversial, doesn't cost much US taxpayer money, and doesn't
require a significant US presence on the ground. It is perhaps the only way to
reset the currently tense relationship by gradually rebuilding trust between
the two sides,” Mr. Saab concluded in a detailed study.
So far, the US assistance has continued uninterrupted
despite the strains in the relationship.
However, to put the relationship back on an even keel
and secure greater Saudi and Gulf sensitivity to US concerns, the United States will have to find a way to offer Gulf
states the clarity and commitment they need in politically feasible ways at
home.
That could be easier said than done with an
administration that often portrays an increasingly complex world in binary
black-and-white terms.
Thank
you to all who have demonstrated their appreciation for my column by becoming
paid subscribers. This allows me to ensure that it continues to have maximum
impact. Maintaining free distributions means that news website, blogs, and
newsletters across the globe can republish it. I launched my column, The
Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer, 12 years ago. To borrow a phrase from an
early proprietor of The Observer, it offers readers, listeners, and viewers
‘the scoop of interpretation.’ If you are able and willing to support the
column, please become a paid subscriber by clicking on Substack on the subscription
button and choosing one of the subscription options.
Dr. James
M. Dorsey is an award-winning journalist and scholar, an Adjunct Senior Fellow
at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International
Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and blog, The Turbulent World of
Middle East Soccer.
Comments
Post a Comment