Israel Shines in the Gulf Where Big Powers Falter, but That Could Prove Tricky
FIREFLY, a miniature tactical loitering weapon system
which is part of the SPIKE missile family (Photo RAFAEL Defense Systems-
Twitter)
by James
M. Dorsey
This
story was first published in Inside
Arabia
A podcast
version of this story is available on
Soundcloud, Itunes,
Spotify,
Stitcher,
TuneIn,
Spreaker,
Pocket Casts, Tumblr,
Podbean, Audecibel, Patreon and Castbox.
Israel
is proving to Gulf states that it is a more reliable partner in some respects
than big powers like the United States, China, or Russia. But the limits of
cooperation with Israel could come to the forefront at a time of economic
crisis in which Gulf states are likely to have to renegotiate long-standing
social contracts.
The Firefly, an Israeli-built loitering kamikaze
drone, part of the Spike family of missiles that the Jewish state has sold to
various European nations, may be one reason why Gulf states, and particularly
Saudi Arabia, have cozied up to Israel in a seeming reversal of their past
support of Palestinian rights.
If there is
one lesson that Gulf states have learned from the United States’ reduced
commitment to the region and the strains in US-Saudi relations, it is that
putting one’s eggs in one basket is risky business.
That has not
prevented the United States from continuing to secure its place as the
region’s foremost
arms supplier as this month’s arms and related commercial deals prove.
The US Defense Department announced
a $2.6 billion USD Saudi deal to acquire 1,000 air-to-surface and anti-ship
missiles from Boeing. Within days, Saudi Arabia’s Al Tadrea Manufacturing Company tweeted
that it had reached agreement with Oshkosh Defense to establish a joint venture
to manufacture armed vehicles in the kingdom.
The Public Investment Fund,
Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, disclosed separately that it had recently
taken a $ 713.7 million USD stake in Boeing at a time when the company, already
suffering major setbacks because of its 737-Max fiasco, took a significant hit
as a result of a collapse of the civilian aviation industry.
The
continued Saudi arms focus on the United States has not deprived China of
opportunities. China has stepped in to help Saudi Arabia produce unmanned
military vehicles after the United States refused to sell its MQ-9 Reaper
killer drone to the kingdom. Saudi Arabia expects production to start next
year.
Like China,
Russia has been urging Saudi Arabia to purchase its acclaimed S-400
anti-missile defense system. So far, the kingdom, having watched the United
States cancel NATO-member Turkey’s purchase of US F-35 fighter jets and its
co-production agreement of some of the plane’s components after it acquired the
Russian system, has been reticent to take the Russians up on their offer.
The
limitations of Saudi-Russian cooperation have since become obvious with April’s
price war between the two major oil producers that sent oil markets into a
tailspin from which they are unlikely to recover any time soon.
Israel, like
China and Russia and unlike the United States, puts no problematic restrictions
such as adherence to human rights and use of weaponry in accordance with international
law on its arms sales.
But Israel
has one leg up on its Chinese and Russian competitors who maintain close ties
to Iran. Israel shares with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) a
perception of Iran as an existential threat and a destabilizing force in the
Middle East that at the very least needs to be contained.
To be sure,
that is a perception that Saudi Arabia and the UAE see reflected in the United
States’ maximum pressure policy towards Iran which aims to force the Islamic
Republic to “change its behavior,” if not change its regime.
The problem
is that maximum pressure two years into the imposition of harsh US economic
sanctions has produced little result.
Add to that
the fact that the United States has proven to be an unreliable ally when the
chips are down, persuading the UAE and other smaller Gulf states to reach out
to Iran to ensure that their critical national infrastructure does not become a
target in any future major US-Iranian military conflagration.
The
watershed moment for the Gulf states was when the United States failed to
respond forcefully last spring and summer to alleged Iranian attacks on key
Saudi oil facilities as well as oil tankers off the coast of the UAE.
The Trump
administration, in a bid to reassure Gulf states, weeks later sent troops and
Patriot anti-missile defense systems to Saudi Arabia to help it protect its oil
installations, although the United States withdrew two of those systems earlier
this month.
It took the
killing of a US military contractor in December 2019 for the United States to
respond to tens of Iranian-backed attacks on American targets in Iraq. And when
it did, with the killing in January of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, Gulf
states privately celebrated the demise of their nemesis, but also feared that
it was overkill, bringing the Middle East to the brink of an all-out war.
Gulf states
are likely to find that cooperation with Israel has its limits too. Israel may
be eager to sell weaponry and have the capability to push back at Iran in
Syria. If need be, Israel can also severely damage, if not take out, Iranian
nuclear and missile facilities in military strikes that Gulf states would be
unable to carry out.
But ties to
Israel remain a sensitive issue in the Gulf and elsewhere in the Arab and
Muslim world. And Israel has so far restricted sales to non-lethal equipment
and technology. That could change with a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict and the establishment of formal diplomatic relations.
Public
opinion, however, may be one reason Gulf states have refused to turn unofficial
relations into diplomatic recognition, suggesting that there may be greater
public empathy for Palestinians than Gulf rulers wish to admit.
That could
count for more with Gulf rulers finding it increasingly difficult to provide
public goods and services, among which first and foremost jobs, as a result of
the global economic crisis and the collapse of oil prices.
Dr. James
M. Dorsey is an award-winning journalist and a senior fellow at Nanyang
Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in
Singapore. He is also an adjunct senior research fellow at the National
University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute and co-director of the
University of Wuerzburg’s Institute of Fan Culture in Germany
Comments
Post a Comment