Israel joins Russia in laughing its way to the bank after Trump-Zelensky spat
By James M.
Dorsey
Columns like The Turbulent World are essential reading in
a world of sharply diminished coverage of international affairs by mainstream
media. The Turbulent World offers fact-based, in-depth, and hard-hitting
reporting and analysis of the Middle East and the Muslim world as global power
shifts and the region’s relationship with Asia emerges as a pillar of a new
world order.
Paid subscribers of The Turbulent World gain access to
the column’s extensive archive, exclusive posts, and polling.
They can leave comments, join debates, and know they are supporting independent
writing, reporting, and analysis that lets the chips fall where they fall.
The Turbulent World can only sustain and expand its
independent coverage free of advertisements and clickbait with the support of
its readers.
So, please consider pledging your support by clicking
here.
To listen to the podcast or watch the video, click here.
Russia is
not the only country laughing all the way to the bank after US President Donald
J. Trump’s war of words with his visiting Ukrainian
counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky.
So is
Israel. Mr. Trump’s willingness to accommodate Russian President Vladimir Putin
serves Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s purpose as he seeks to
redraw the Middle East map in his mould.
Volodymyr Zelensky
and Donald J. Trump’s Oval Office war of words. Credit: CNN
Mr.
Netanyahu signalled as much, when days before Mr. Trump’s shouting match with
Mr. Zelensky, Israel voted against a United Nations
General Assembly resolution that affirmed Ukraine’s territorial integrity and condemned
Russia’s invasion of the country. It was the first time Israel voted against
Ukraine since the Russian invasion three years ago.
Initially,
Israeli officials portrayed the vote as Israel succumbing to US pressure that, according to one official, “came
at all levels, at the UN, in Washington, and in Israel.”
In the days
since the ballot, Israel signalled that its vote, coupled with its use of military force and landgrabs to demilitarise most of its
neighbours’ borders with the Jewish state, is about being a player in a new
world order dominated by spheres of influence in which certain countries are
top dog.
It’s a world Mr. Netanyahu knows how to maneuver.
Mr.
Netanyahu sees opportunity in his Ukraine vote, Mr. Trump’s overall support for
the prime minister’s policies, and the president’s willingness to reshape
debate by initially staking out maximalist positions like his Gaza resettlement
plan that would see the Strip’s population evicted from the territory.
In Mr.
Netanyahu’s mind, Israel is Mr. Trump’s regional top dog in a Middle East in
which the Jewish state’s interests align with the interests of Egypt, Jordan,
and the Gulf states, potentially browbeaten by the United States to fall into
line.
In reality,
the opposite may be true, as Israel’s war conduct and refusal to embrace the
notion of an independent Palestinian state drive Arabs and Israelis further
apart.
Even so, Mr.
Netanyahu thinks that by getting in front of the cart, he not only curries
favour in Washington but also reopens doors to Russia closed during the Gaza
war and potentially enlists Russia in cementing Israel’s top dog position in
the Middle East.
Exploiting the fact that Syria doesn’t rank high on Mr. Trump’s agenda, Israel has lobbied his administration to endorse a continued Russian military presence in a decentralised Syria.
Israel believes
Russian military bases and Kurdish autonomy in northern Syria will weaken
Turkish influence in Damascus on the back of Turkey’s support for Hayat Tahrir
al-Sham, the jihadist group that spearheaded the toppling of President Bashar
al-Assad.
Hayat Tahrir
leader-turned-President Ahmed al-Sharaa reportedly expressed a willingness to
allow Russia to maintain its bases in Syria provided it returned Mr Al-Assad
and took responsibility for its support for the former president during the
civil war through “concrete measures such as compensation, reconstruction and
recovery."
With Turkey
at times threatening to enter the Gaza war in support of the Palestinians,
Israel is likely most concerned about having a hostile, battle-hardened NATO
member on its border backed by a depleted Syrian military populated by Islamist
rebels.
As a result,
Mr. Netanyahu this week demanded that Syria refrain from deploying forces south of the capital
Damascus.
“We demand
the complete demilitarization of southern Syria in the provinces of Quneitra,
Daraa, and Suwayda from the forces of the new regime,” Mr. Netanyahu said.
The Israeli
military drove the point home by attacking military targets in southern Syria shortly after Mr.
Netanyahu spoke.
Earlier,
Israel insisted it would remain for the foreseeable future on
Syrian territory
beyond the Golan Heights, occupied in the 1967 Middle East war. Israeli troops
moved into a United Nations buffer zone in Syria immediately after Mr.
Al-Assad’s overthrow.
Mr.
Netanyahu is also lobbying Mr. Trump to maintain the 2,000 US troops in
northern Syria tasked with fighting the Islamic State in cooperation with the
predominantly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) that wants autonomy for
the Kurds in a federated Syria.
Syrian
Kurdish media reported in January that Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar gave
“positive guarantees to the rights of the Kurds.” Earlier, Mr. Saar described the Kurds as Israel’s “natural
allies.”
Designated a
terrorist group by Turkey because of its links to the outlawed Turkish ‘Kurdish
Workers Party (PKK),’ the SDF provided the ground troops in the US-led fight
against the Islamic State.
This week,
the SDF and its allies rejected a call by imprisoned PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan
for the group to end its four-decade-long low-intensity insurgency in southeastern
Turkey and dissolve itself.
SDF commander Mazloum Abdi said Mr. Ocalan’s call applied to
the PKK, not the SDF, while Democratic Union Party (PYD) chairman
Salih Muslim
insisted that the Kurds would only disarm once Turkey and its proxies stop
attacking them.
The SDF
earlier rejected Mr. Al-Sharaa’s insistence that the group disarm and that its
fighters individually join the Syrian military, not as a bloc as demanded by
the Kurdish group. Mr. Al-Sharaa further aligned himself with Turkey in vetoing
Kurdish self-rule.
Chances are near
zero that Mr. Netanyahu risks one day suffering Mr. Zelensky’s fate in the
White House.
Even so, the
coming weeks may indicate whether there is any daylight between the Trump
administration and Mr. Netanyahu.
An important
indicator will be the president's response to a plan likely to be adopted by an
Arab summit in Cairo early in the week.
The plan is the Arab world’s response to Mr.
Trump’s proposal to resettle Gaza’s 2.3 million inhabitants in Egypt, Jordan,
and elsewhere and turn the Strip into a high-end beachfront real estate
development.
SDF commander Mazloum Abdi said Mr. Ocalan’s call applied to
the PKK, not the SDF, while Democratic Union Party (PYD) chairman
Salih Muslim
insisted that the Kurds would only disarm once Turkey and its proxies stop
attacking them.
The SDF
earlier rejected Mr. Al-Sharaa’s insistence that the group disarm and that its
fighters individually join the Syrian military, not as a bloc as demanded by
the Kurdish group. Mr. Al-Sharaa further aligned himself with Turkey in vetoing
Kurdish self-rule.
Chances are near
zero that Mr. Netanyahu risks one day suffering Mr. Zelensky’s fate in the
White House.
Even so, the
coming weeks may indicate whether there is any daylight between the Trump
administration and Mr. Netanyahu.
An important
indicator will be the president's response to a plan likely to be adopted by an
Arab summit in Cairo early in the week.
The plan is the Arab world’s response to Mr.
Trump’s proposal to resettle Gaza’s 2.3 million inhabitants in Egypt, Jordan,
and elsewhere and turn the Strip into a high-end beachfront real estate
development.
The plan
reportedly calls for an end to the war, the installation of an interim post-war
administration made up of Gazan businessmen and notables, a retrained
Palestinian security force, and safe zones in Gaza for the population during
reconstruction.
In an
indication that he may be more restrained in his dealings with Arab countries,
Mr. Trump last month refrained from giving King Abdullah of Jordan, like
Ukraine, a country dependent on US largesse, the Zelensky treatment for
rejecting his Gaza plan.
Even so,
Israel is likely to take heart from Iranians worrying that Ukraine may not be
the only country at risk of being a sacrificial lamb on the altar of big power
politics.
In addition,
Israelis see US-Iranian nuclear talks, if it comes to that, potentially breaking
down in much the same way Messrs. Trump and Zelensky’s car careened off the
road.
Mr. Trump
has repeatedly indicated that he prefers a negotiated nuclear
agreement with Iran
rather than military action to take out the country’s nuclear facilities, as
advocated by Mr. Netanyahu.
Messrs.
Trump and Zelensky’s public spat reduces the immediate risk of Iran joining
Ukraine on the altar, but it doesn’t eliminate the possibility of Iran
ultimately being part of a US-Russian grand bargain despite Russia Iran signing
a “comprehensive strategic partnership” in January.
“Russia forgets it friends in difficult circumstances,” said
political analyst Rahman Qahremanpour.
In that case,
Israel could join Russia more than once laughing its way to the bank.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an
Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam
School of International Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and
podcast, The Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.
Comments
Post a Comment