Trump plays with fire in Gaza
By James M. Dorsey
Columns
like The Turbulent World are essential reading in a world of sharply diminished
coverage of international affairs by mainstream media. The Turbulent World
offers fact-based, in-depth, and hard-hitting reporting and analysis of the
Middle East and the Muslim world as global power shifts and the region’s
relationship with Asia emerges as a pillar of a new world order.
Paid
subscribers of The Turbulent World gain access to the column’s extensive
archive, exclusive posts, and polling. They can leave comments, join debates, and
know they are supporting independent writing, reporting, and analysis that lets
the chips fall where they fall.
The Turbulent World can only sustain and expand its independent coverage
free of advertisements and clickbait with the support of its readers.
So, please consider pledging your support by clicking here.
To listen to the podcast or watch the video please click here.
US President
Donald J. Trump’s Gaza plan could change the nature of the Gaza war and prolong
rather than end the hostilities.
Amid calls
for a unified Arab response to Mr. Trump’s plan to resettle or ethnically
cleanse Gazan Palestinians, according to many Middle Easterners, officials,
journalists, analysts, and social media activists are mulling options.
The options
under discussion range from approaches that would give US companies a
significant stake in Gaza’s reconstruction to the fuelling of a Hamas-led armed
guerilla-style resistance.
Rather than
welcoming ethnically cleansed Gazan Palestinians, US and Israeli officials and
analysts fear that Egypt, the only Arab country bordering on Gaza, could serve
as the funnel for the rearming and repositioning of Hamas as the resistance
against the Israeli-backed Trump plan.
Hamas’
rebranding as a popular resistance movement would represent a stunning
turnaround for a movement whose popularity had dropped to
single digits.
Many Palestinians
blamed the group for Israel’s devastation of Gaza in response to the Hamas-led
October 7, 2023, attack on Israel that killed some 1,200 people, mostly
civilians.
The
rebranding would legitimise renewed Hamas rocket and missile attacks on Israeli
cities.
Col. Shemer
Raviv. Credit: Times of Israel
Col. Shemer
Raviv, the commander of the Israeli brigade responsible for security on the
200-kilolmetre-long Egypt-Israel border, said smugglers’ drones carrying
weapons and contraband into Israel posed the greatest cross-border threat.
Mr. Raviv
said he worried smugglers and fighters could use explosives-laden drones and,
eventually, unmanned aircraft large enough to transport people clandestinely across the border.
Rearming
Hamas may be a last resort, if it is an option at all, but the fact that it is
touted indicates the degree to which Arab governing elites view resettlement in
Egypt and Jordan as a destabilising, existential threat.
The fact
that Mr. Trump’s plan renders a successful negotiation of the Gaza ceasefire’s second phase even more unlikely than it already
was before the president’s announcement enhances the threat of Hamas’
reemergence as the resistance against ethnic cleansing.
If the
United States takes ownership of Gaza, negotiating an end to the war, Israel’s
withdrawal from Gaza and the post-war administration of the Strip would be non-sensical
given that the United States and Israel would have already resolved those
issues as far as they are concerned.
Moreover,
Hamas, despite moving forward with the agreed first-phase prisoner exchanges,
may see no reason to agree to a second round of swaps if many of the freed
Palestinian inmates are going to be either deported or resettled.
Israeli
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, speaking to senior administration officials
and members of Congress after Mr. Trump dropped his bombshell, appeared to take
on board the potential fallout of the president’s announcement as he laid out
his conditions for an end to the Gaza war and suggested changes to the
ceasefire’s terms.
Mr. Netanyahu had good reason to smugly grin as he stood this week in the White House alongside Mr. Trump when the president announced his Gaza plan.
Credit:
Axios
Days before
meeting Mr. Trump, Mr. Netanyahu made sure that Steve Witkoff, the president’s
straight-talking Middle East envoy, became not only the first senior US
official to visit Gaza in 15 years but also the first administration
representative to get an unvarnished view of the devastation Israel wreaked on
the Strip.
Mr. Witkoff
returned from Gaza, telling reporters, “It's physically impossible" for
Palestinians to return to northern Gaza as envisioned in the ceasefire agreement. Israel laid
siege to the north of Gaza in the last 3.5 months before the ceasefire came
into effect on January 19.
“In any city
in the USA, if you had damage that was 1/100th of what I saw in Gaza… nobody
would be allowed to go back to their homes. That’s how dangerous it is. There
are 30,000 unexploded munitions; there are buildings that could tip over at any
moment; there are no utilities there whatsoever; no working water, electricity,
gas — nothing. God knows what kind of disease might be festering there. I'm
giving you a really granular view of the reality that exists there today,"
Mr. Witkoff said.
Putting on his ahistorical real estate glasses, Mr. Witkoff added in a Fox News interview that for Palestinians, “a better life is not necessarily tied to the physical space you are in.”
Gaza City.
Credit: +972
Investigative
reporting by Israeli sister media +972 and Local Call concluded that Gaza’s
devastation was in part the product of bombing residential
areas in the absence
of knowing Hamas commanders’ precise location.
The just
published investigation focussed on the use at times of of bombs containing
byproducts designed to suffocate militants in underground tunnels and the
military’s authorisation of high Palestinian casualty or collateral damage
rates.
“Pinpointing
a target inside a tunnel is hard, so you attack a (wide) radius… (of) tens and
sometimes hundreds of meters” in bombings that collapse multiple apartment
buildings, +972 and Local Call quoted an Israeli military intelligence source as
saying.
In line with
his approach to the war from day one, Mr. Netanyahu said he would agree to end hostilities if Hamas
relinquished power and its leaders went into exile.
In exchange
for what would amount to a surrender, Mr. Netanyahu said he would release
"senior" Palestinian prisoners whom Israel refused to include in the
swaps so far, provided Hamas agreed to their deportation.
He also
suggested extending the first phase of the ceasefire to allow for the swapping of
more Hamas-held hostages without ending the war, resolving the post-war
governance issue, and agreeing on the terms of an Israeli withdrawal.
The
ceasefire agreement envisioned the 42-day first-phase release in weekly stages
of 33 of the 92 Hamas-held hostages in exchange for some 1,900 Palestinians
incarcerated in Israeli prisons.
So far,
Hamas and Islamic Jihad have swapped 16 hostages for hundreds of Palestinians.
Israel and
Hamas have yet to negotiate the exchange rates for releasing the remaining 59
hostages in the ceasefire's second phase. Mr. Netanyahu suggested negotiating
the terms for releasing several more hostages in an extended first phase.
Israeli
officials doubted Hamas would accept any of Mr. Netanyahu’s terms. They said
the impasse could spark the ceasefire’s collapse.
“We are
still committed to the ceasefire and all the steps that were agreed upon, but
it’s clear that until now, the Israelis have not fulfilled all that we agreed
upon. They are till now preventing the essential needs for the Palestinians to
go to Gaza…We have told the mediators that this will sabotage the whole process
if the Israelis continue acting like this,” said Hamas spokesman Osama Hamdan.
Credit: MEI
Egypt, a key
Gaza war mediator, and other Middle Eastern states, although faced with a
potential collapse and renewed hostilities in which Israel may feel it can forcibly
expel Palestinians from their homeland, have good reasons for pursuing peaceful
ways of countering Israel rather than violent forms of resistance.
Putting
relations with the United States at risk, Egyptian support for an armed
resistance against Israel would be the death knell for the 1979 Egyptian-Israeli
peace treaty, the first between an Arab country and the Jewish state.
This would
jeopardize Jordan’s 1994 peace treaty and Israel’s more recent diplomatic
relations with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco.
Egypt has,
by necessity, kept its lines open to Hamas, but there is no love lost between
the group and the authorities in Cairo.
Egypt has
long viewed Hamas as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. Egyptian President
Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has cracked down on the Brotherhood since overthrowing
Mohammed Morsi, a Muslim Brother and Egypt’s first and only democratically
elected leader, in a 2013 military coup.
For Egypt,
potentially strengthening Hamas’ grip on Gaza would amount to an act of
desperation.
Instead,
Egypt and other Arab states are considering offering US companies significant
reconstruction contracts in exchange for Mr. Trump abandoning the notion of resettlement.
The
contracts could be the rebuilding of war-ravaged infrastructure across the
Middle East and North Africa, including Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, and
Gaza, or for Gaza only.
If for Gaza
only, one suggestion would involve resettling Gazans to locations within the
Strip while other areas are reconstructed.
Some sources
suggested that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman could use part of the US$600 billion he offered to invest
in the United States
during Mr. Trump’s four-year tenure as president to fund the reconstruction.
The problem
is that time is not on the side of Egypt and other Arab states. The train would
likely leave the station as the ceasefire collapses and the war resumes.
Violence would loom large as reconstruction retreats into the background.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is an
Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam
School of International Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and
podcast, The Turbulent World with James M. Dorsey.

Comments
Post a Comment